“To split hairs” vs “To be pedantic”Determining sequenceHow would “Do you know what happened?” be understood?What expression should I use in this case?“Did you have the chance” or “Had you got the chance”?What is the difference between 'seemed disappointed' and 'seemed to be disappointed'?Forge Vs CounterfeitOn (at) a moment(')s notice?“both truth and beauty on my love depends” - why not “depend”? Is “depends” a plural verb (a Shakespearean website says so)?What is armchair science?When your spirits are not adapted to a particular situation
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?
I see my dog run
Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Filling an area between two curves
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
New order #4: World
Would Tezos benefit from parallelisation?
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Java: Is there a common interface or superclass for arrays and collections?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
“To split hairs” vs “To be pedantic”
Determining sequenceHow would “Do you know what happened?” be understood?What expression should I use in this case?“Did you have the chance” or “Had you got the chance”?What is the difference between 'seemed disappointed' and 'seemed to be disappointed'?Forge Vs CounterfeitOn (at) a moment(')s notice?“both truth and beauty on my love depends” - why not “depend”? Is “depends” a plural verb (a Shakespearean website says so)?What is armchair science?When your spirits are not adapted to a particular situation
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
How shall I semantically distinguish to be pedantic and splitting hairs while they both indicate the same message about a person who is paying too much attention to some unnecessary details?
verbs phrases
add a comment |
How shall I semantically distinguish to be pedantic and splitting hairs while they both indicate the same message about a person who is paying too much attention to some unnecessary details?
verbs phrases
add a comment |
How shall I semantically distinguish to be pedantic and splitting hairs while they both indicate the same message about a person who is paying too much attention to some unnecessary details?
verbs phrases
How shall I semantically distinguish to be pedantic and splitting hairs while they both indicate the same message about a person who is paying too much attention to some unnecessary details?
verbs phrases
verbs phrases
edited 2 hours ago
Astralbee
14.6k1451
14.6k1451
asked 2 hours ago
A-friendA-friend
4,0941569150
4,0941569150
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
To be pedantic means to be excessively concerned with minor details.
"Splitting hairs" is a kind of pedantry, but more specific. It is used when someone focuses on a minute difference between two things.
Example of pedantic:
Person 1: This record is from the 1980s.
Person 2: Actually it was originally released in 1979 and then re-released in 1981 so technically it is a 1970s record.
This is pedantry because person 2 has corrected a minor detail.
Example of splitting hairs:
Person 1: This is a great vinyl record.
Person 2: Technically it polyvinyl chloride.
I would say this is "splitting hairs" because person 2 hasn't really corrected a mistake - records are commonly referred to as 'vinyl', and polyvinyl chloride is a derivative of vinyl - but they have drawn attention to a difference that doesn't really matter.
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204620%2fto-split-hairs-vs-to-be-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To be pedantic means to be excessively concerned with minor details.
"Splitting hairs" is a kind of pedantry, but more specific. It is used when someone focuses on a minute difference between two things.
Example of pedantic:
Person 1: This record is from the 1980s.
Person 2: Actually it was originally released in 1979 and then re-released in 1981 so technically it is a 1970s record.
This is pedantry because person 2 has corrected a minor detail.
Example of splitting hairs:
Person 1: This is a great vinyl record.
Person 2: Technically it polyvinyl chloride.
I would say this is "splitting hairs" because person 2 hasn't really corrected a mistake - records are commonly referred to as 'vinyl', and polyvinyl chloride is a derivative of vinyl - but they have drawn attention to a difference that doesn't really matter.
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
add a comment |
To be pedantic means to be excessively concerned with minor details.
"Splitting hairs" is a kind of pedantry, but more specific. It is used when someone focuses on a minute difference between two things.
Example of pedantic:
Person 1: This record is from the 1980s.
Person 2: Actually it was originally released in 1979 and then re-released in 1981 so technically it is a 1970s record.
This is pedantry because person 2 has corrected a minor detail.
Example of splitting hairs:
Person 1: This is a great vinyl record.
Person 2: Technically it polyvinyl chloride.
I would say this is "splitting hairs" because person 2 hasn't really corrected a mistake - records are commonly referred to as 'vinyl', and polyvinyl chloride is a derivative of vinyl - but they have drawn attention to a difference that doesn't really matter.
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
add a comment |
To be pedantic means to be excessively concerned with minor details.
"Splitting hairs" is a kind of pedantry, but more specific. It is used when someone focuses on a minute difference between two things.
Example of pedantic:
Person 1: This record is from the 1980s.
Person 2: Actually it was originally released in 1979 and then re-released in 1981 so technically it is a 1970s record.
This is pedantry because person 2 has corrected a minor detail.
Example of splitting hairs:
Person 1: This is a great vinyl record.
Person 2: Technically it polyvinyl chloride.
I would say this is "splitting hairs" because person 2 hasn't really corrected a mistake - records are commonly referred to as 'vinyl', and polyvinyl chloride is a derivative of vinyl - but they have drawn attention to a difference that doesn't really matter.
To be pedantic means to be excessively concerned with minor details.
"Splitting hairs" is a kind of pedantry, but more specific. It is used when someone focuses on a minute difference between two things.
Example of pedantic:
Person 1: This record is from the 1980s.
Person 2: Actually it was originally released in 1979 and then re-released in 1981 so technically it is a 1970s record.
This is pedantry because person 2 has corrected a minor detail.
Example of splitting hairs:
Person 1: This is a great vinyl record.
Person 2: Technically it polyvinyl chloride.
I would say this is "splitting hairs" because person 2 hasn't really corrected a mistake - records are commonly referred to as 'vinyl', and polyvinyl chloride is a derivative of vinyl - but they have drawn attention to a difference that doesn't really matter.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
AstralbeeAstralbee
14.6k1451
14.6k1451
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
add a comment |
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Many thanks, but it is not still quite clear to me! Do you think it can being pedantic is a matter of obsession OR sort of being so strict or hard on sb and showing a depecating attitude towards someone?!
– A-friend
1 hour ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
Though really, arguing over the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being pedantic" is - well, you know...
– Darrel Hoffman
10 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204620%2fto-split-hairs-vs-to-be-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown