Do Shazam and Man of Steel exist in same universe?How did the final confrontation in Man of Steel get resolved?How does Superman accelerate when he flies in Man of Steel?Why does General Zod need armor in the Man of Steel film?Lara's pregnancy in Man of SteelWhy use titles like 'Dark Knight' and 'Man of Steel'?Is there really a bugle trophy in Man of Steel?Why does Superman scream at the end of Man of Steel?Man of Steel Easter EggsWhy is Clark out doing random odd jobs all over in Man of Steel?What was Wonder Woman doing during the events of Man of Steel?

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Springs with some finite mass

Can one use the reaction spell from the War Caster feat to cast Bigby's Hand?

I see my dog run

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Is it possible to build an equivalent function just looking at the input and output of the original function?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Can I buy Keisei train tickets with international debit card?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

What is this 4-propeller plane?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?

Is std::next for vector O(n) or O(1)?



Do Shazam and Man of Steel exist in same universe?


How did the final confrontation in Man of Steel get resolved?How does Superman accelerate when he flies in Man of Steel?Why does General Zod need armor in the Man of Steel film?Lara's pregnancy in Man of SteelWhy use titles like 'Dark Knight' and 'Man of Steel'?Is there really a bugle trophy in Man of Steel?Why does Superman scream at the end of Man of Steel?Man of Steel Easter EggsWhy is Clark out doing random odd jobs all over in Man of Steel?What was Wonder Woman doing during the events of Man of Steel?













5















In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










share|improve this question




























    5















    In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



    From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



    Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



    Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5








      In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



      From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



      Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



      Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










      share|improve this question
















      In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



      From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



      Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



      Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?







      character dc-extended-universe shazam






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 38 mins ago









      Ankit Sharma

      76.4k63407621




      76.4k63407621










      asked 3 hours ago









      RC0993RC0993

      24513




      24513




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




          The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




          Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



          From Rrunpee:




          According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




          And they also list other sources too:




          Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
          characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
          thing. It’s world-building.



          ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
          Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




          Also from CBR:




          In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




          I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.






          share|improve this answer

























          • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

            – RC0993
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

            – Ankit Sharma
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 updated with more info

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago











          • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

            – RC0993
            2 hours ago







          • 1





            movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago


















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




          The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




          Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



          From Rrunpee:




          According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




          And they also list other sources too:




          Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
          characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
          thing. It’s world-building.



          ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
          Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




          Also from CBR:




          In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




          I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.






          share|improve this answer

























          • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

            – RC0993
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

            – Ankit Sharma
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 updated with more info

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago











          • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

            – RC0993
            2 hours ago







          • 1





            movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago















          4














          Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




          The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




          Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



          From Rrunpee:




          According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




          And they also list other sources too:




          Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
          characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
          thing. It’s world-building.



          ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
          Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




          Also from CBR:




          In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




          I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.






          share|improve this answer

























          • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

            – RC0993
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

            – Ankit Sharma
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 updated with more info

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago











          • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

            – RC0993
            2 hours ago







          • 1





            movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago













          4












          4








          4







          Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




          The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




          Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



          From Rrunpee:




          According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




          And they also list other sources too:




          Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
          characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
          thing. It’s world-building.



          ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
          Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




          Also from CBR:




          In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




          I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.






          share|improve this answer















          Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




          The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




          Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



          From Rrunpee:




          According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




          And they also list other sources too:




          Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
          characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
          thing. It’s world-building.



          ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
          Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




          Also from CBR:




          In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




          I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

          76.4k63407621




          76.4k63407621












          • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

            – RC0993
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

            – Ankit Sharma
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 updated with more info

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago











          • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

            – RC0993
            2 hours ago







          • 1





            movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago

















          • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

            – RC0993
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

            – Ankit Sharma
            3 hours ago











          • @RC0993 updated with more info

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago











          • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

            – RC0993
            2 hours ago







          • 1





            movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

            – Ankit Sharma
            2 hours ago
















          completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

          – RC0993
          3 hours ago





          completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

          – RC0993
          3 hours ago













          @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

          – Ankit Sharma
          3 hours ago





          @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

          – Ankit Sharma
          3 hours ago













          @RC0993 updated with more info

          – Ankit Sharma
          2 hours ago





          @RC0993 updated with more info

          – Ankit Sharma
          2 hours ago













          [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

          – RC0993
          2 hours ago






          [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

          – RC0993
          2 hours ago





          1




          1





          movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

          – Ankit Sharma
          2 hours ago





          movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

          – Ankit Sharma
          2 hours ago



          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

          Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

          inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX