acmart: Multiple authors: all with same affiliation, one author an additional affiliationHow to Write Names of Multiple Authors with Shared Affiliation in ACM 2017 Template?Multiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationSame affiliation for all authors without extra packagesIOS-Book-Article.cls: one author with multiple affiliationacmart: Shared Author AffiliationMultiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationAuthor affiliation with only 1 authorAdding Multiple Authors with Different Affiliation in LaTeX ArticleLaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same lineHow to Label Multiple Authors with Same DescriptionHow to make two authors use the same affiliationTwo authors with same affiliation on finished front page
Check if two datetimes are between two others
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
Piano - What is the notation for a double stop where both notes in the double stop are different lengths?
What to wear for invited talk in Canada
Pristine Bit Checking
Lied on resume at previous job
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors
Where to refill my bottle in India?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?
Copycat chess is back
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Finding files for which a command fails
Can produce flame be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?
Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?
How to create a consistent feel for character names in a fantasy setting?
Why is making salt water prohibited on Shabbat?
acmart: Multiple authors: all with same affiliation, one author an additional affiliation
How to Write Names of Multiple Authors with Shared Affiliation in ACM 2017 Template?Multiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationSame affiliation for all authors without extra packagesIOS-Book-Article.cls: one author with multiple affiliationacmart: Shared Author AffiliationMultiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationAuthor affiliation with only 1 authorAdding Multiple Authors with Different Affiliation in LaTeX ArticleLaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same lineHow to Label Multiple Authors with Same DescriptionHow to make two authors use the same affiliationTwo authors with same affiliation on finished front page
I'm using "acmart" as the template. We have three authors, all from the same university but one of the authors also affiliated with an institute. I'm aware of this question, however, its compiled version generates affiliation/email blocks redundantly.
My current version is like this:
authorNaghi Mamuli$^*$,hspace1em Arastoo Amel$^*mathsection$,hspace1em Homa Saadat$^*$
affiliation%
vspace-1eminstitutionAliabad State University$^*$ hspace0.3em North Laboratory$^mathsection$
affiliation%
institutionnaghi,hspace0.2emarastoo,hspace0.2emhoma@aliabad.ac.ir
That is compiled as:
As you can see, each of authors, affiliations, emails gets only one single line.
This is fine until we want to add ACM Reference Format:
As you can see, the marks (e.g *) that I have used to associate affiliations, now are visible in the "ACM Reference Format" since it is created automatically from the author names.
Is there any way that I can use "marks" but remove them in "ACM Reference Format"? or change this code to compile concisely like this one but without any problem in "ACM Reference Format"?
titlesec affiliation author
add a comment |
I'm using "acmart" as the template. We have three authors, all from the same university but one of the authors also affiliated with an institute. I'm aware of this question, however, its compiled version generates affiliation/email blocks redundantly.
My current version is like this:
authorNaghi Mamuli$^*$,hspace1em Arastoo Amel$^*mathsection$,hspace1em Homa Saadat$^*$
affiliation%
vspace-1eminstitutionAliabad State University$^*$ hspace0.3em North Laboratory$^mathsection$
affiliation%
institutionnaghi,hspace0.2emarastoo,hspace0.2emhoma@aliabad.ac.ir
That is compiled as:
As you can see, each of authors, affiliations, emails gets only one single line.
This is fine until we want to add ACM Reference Format:
As you can see, the marks (e.g *) that I have used to associate affiliations, now are visible in the "ACM Reference Format" since it is created automatically from the author names.
Is there any way that I can use "marks" but remove them in "ACM Reference Format"? or change this code to compile concisely like this one but without any problem in "ACM Reference Format"?
titlesec affiliation author
add a comment |
I'm using "acmart" as the template. We have three authors, all from the same university but one of the authors also affiliated with an institute. I'm aware of this question, however, its compiled version generates affiliation/email blocks redundantly.
My current version is like this:
authorNaghi Mamuli$^*$,hspace1em Arastoo Amel$^*mathsection$,hspace1em Homa Saadat$^*$
affiliation%
vspace-1eminstitutionAliabad State University$^*$ hspace0.3em North Laboratory$^mathsection$
affiliation%
institutionnaghi,hspace0.2emarastoo,hspace0.2emhoma@aliabad.ac.ir
That is compiled as:
As you can see, each of authors, affiliations, emails gets only one single line.
This is fine until we want to add ACM Reference Format:
As you can see, the marks (e.g *) that I have used to associate affiliations, now are visible in the "ACM Reference Format" since it is created automatically from the author names.
Is there any way that I can use "marks" but remove them in "ACM Reference Format"? or change this code to compile concisely like this one but without any problem in "ACM Reference Format"?
titlesec affiliation author
I'm using "acmart" as the template. We have three authors, all from the same university but one of the authors also affiliated with an institute. I'm aware of this question, however, its compiled version generates affiliation/email blocks redundantly.
My current version is like this:
authorNaghi Mamuli$^*$,hspace1em Arastoo Amel$^*mathsection$,hspace1em Homa Saadat$^*$
affiliation%
vspace-1eminstitutionAliabad State University$^*$ hspace0.3em North Laboratory$^mathsection$
affiliation%
institutionnaghi,hspace0.2emarastoo,hspace0.2emhoma@aliabad.ac.ir
That is compiled as:
As you can see, each of authors, affiliations, emails gets only one single line.
This is fine until we want to add ACM Reference Format:
As you can see, the marks (e.g *) that I have used to associate affiliations, now are visible in the "ACM Reference Format" since it is created automatically from the author names.
Is there any way that I can use "marks" but remove them in "ACM Reference Format"? or change this code to compile concisely like this one but without any problem in "ACM Reference Format"?
titlesec affiliation author
titlesec affiliation author
edited Mar 30 '18 at 20:15
mhn_namak
asked Mar 30 '18 at 20:02
mhn_namakmhn_namak
264
264
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The ACM Template discourages the use of a single author
for multiple authors.
- The Quick and Dirty Manual mentions explicitly that the template
discourages the use of a "merged block" for authors. - The recommended practice is to code all the authors in individual
author
,affiliation
andemail
commands. An example similar to your listing is marked as a wrong code. - According to the manual (pages 8-12), the template have been designed to provide metadata for each author to the existing extraction tools. Therefore, these tools cannot determine multiple authors if you use only a single
author
command. - There is a closed bug report in the acmart Github repository that explains all.
- There is an answer (here at StackExchange) of the template author explaining it.
Solution proposed in the manual
The manual suggests a solution where each author has an independent author
command and a shared affiliation
. Using this solution, the names of the authors will be presented one above the other and a single affiliation is presented below.
The example code (in the template download and at page 10 of the manual) is
authorBen Trovato
emailtrovato@corporation.com
orcid1234-5678-9012
authorG.K.M. Tobin
emailwebmaster@marysville-ohio.com
affiliation%
institutionInstitute for Clarity in Documentation
streetaddressP.O. Box 1212
cityDublin
stateOhio
postcode43017-6221
The resulting block is like the following:
Other solution: Omit the reference block
However, if you wanna create a single author block, you may check other question at StackExchange.
- You can instruct the template to omit the ACM reference block using
settopmatterprintacmref=false
beforemaketitle
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424066%2facmart-multiple-authors-all-with-same-affiliation-one-author-an-additional-af%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The ACM Template discourages the use of a single author
for multiple authors.
- The Quick and Dirty Manual mentions explicitly that the template
discourages the use of a "merged block" for authors. - The recommended practice is to code all the authors in individual
author
,affiliation
andemail
commands. An example similar to your listing is marked as a wrong code. - According to the manual (pages 8-12), the template have been designed to provide metadata for each author to the existing extraction tools. Therefore, these tools cannot determine multiple authors if you use only a single
author
command. - There is a closed bug report in the acmart Github repository that explains all.
- There is an answer (here at StackExchange) of the template author explaining it.
Solution proposed in the manual
The manual suggests a solution where each author has an independent author
command and a shared affiliation
. Using this solution, the names of the authors will be presented one above the other and a single affiliation is presented below.
The example code (in the template download and at page 10 of the manual) is
authorBen Trovato
emailtrovato@corporation.com
orcid1234-5678-9012
authorG.K.M. Tobin
emailwebmaster@marysville-ohio.com
affiliation%
institutionInstitute for Clarity in Documentation
streetaddressP.O. Box 1212
cityDublin
stateOhio
postcode43017-6221
The resulting block is like the following:
Other solution: Omit the reference block
However, if you wanna create a single author block, you may check other question at StackExchange.
- You can instruct the template to omit the ACM reference block using
settopmatterprintacmref=false
beforemaketitle
add a comment |
The ACM Template discourages the use of a single author
for multiple authors.
- The Quick and Dirty Manual mentions explicitly that the template
discourages the use of a "merged block" for authors. - The recommended practice is to code all the authors in individual
author
,affiliation
andemail
commands. An example similar to your listing is marked as a wrong code. - According to the manual (pages 8-12), the template have been designed to provide metadata for each author to the existing extraction tools. Therefore, these tools cannot determine multiple authors if you use only a single
author
command. - There is a closed bug report in the acmart Github repository that explains all.
- There is an answer (here at StackExchange) of the template author explaining it.
Solution proposed in the manual
The manual suggests a solution where each author has an independent author
command and a shared affiliation
. Using this solution, the names of the authors will be presented one above the other and a single affiliation is presented below.
The example code (in the template download and at page 10 of the manual) is
authorBen Trovato
emailtrovato@corporation.com
orcid1234-5678-9012
authorG.K.M. Tobin
emailwebmaster@marysville-ohio.com
affiliation%
institutionInstitute for Clarity in Documentation
streetaddressP.O. Box 1212
cityDublin
stateOhio
postcode43017-6221
The resulting block is like the following:
Other solution: Omit the reference block
However, if you wanna create a single author block, you may check other question at StackExchange.
- You can instruct the template to omit the ACM reference block using
settopmatterprintacmref=false
beforemaketitle
add a comment |
The ACM Template discourages the use of a single author
for multiple authors.
- The Quick and Dirty Manual mentions explicitly that the template
discourages the use of a "merged block" for authors. - The recommended practice is to code all the authors in individual
author
,affiliation
andemail
commands. An example similar to your listing is marked as a wrong code. - According to the manual (pages 8-12), the template have been designed to provide metadata for each author to the existing extraction tools. Therefore, these tools cannot determine multiple authors if you use only a single
author
command. - There is a closed bug report in the acmart Github repository that explains all.
- There is an answer (here at StackExchange) of the template author explaining it.
Solution proposed in the manual
The manual suggests a solution where each author has an independent author
command and a shared affiliation
. Using this solution, the names of the authors will be presented one above the other and a single affiliation is presented below.
The example code (in the template download and at page 10 of the manual) is
authorBen Trovato
emailtrovato@corporation.com
orcid1234-5678-9012
authorG.K.M. Tobin
emailwebmaster@marysville-ohio.com
affiliation%
institutionInstitute for Clarity in Documentation
streetaddressP.O. Box 1212
cityDublin
stateOhio
postcode43017-6221
The resulting block is like the following:
Other solution: Omit the reference block
However, if you wanna create a single author block, you may check other question at StackExchange.
- You can instruct the template to omit the ACM reference block using
settopmatterprintacmref=false
beforemaketitle
The ACM Template discourages the use of a single author
for multiple authors.
- The Quick and Dirty Manual mentions explicitly that the template
discourages the use of a "merged block" for authors. - The recommended practice is to code all the authors in individual
author
,affiliation
andemail
commands. An example similar to your listing is marked as a wrong code. - According to the manual (pages 8-12), the template have been designed to provide metadata for each author to the existing extraction tools. Therefore, these tools cannot determine multiple authors if you use only a single
author
command. - There is a closed bug report in the acmart Github repository that explains all.
- There is an answer (here at StackExchange) of the template author explaining it.
Solution proposed in the manual
The manual suggests a solution where each author has an independent author
command and a shared affiliation
. Using this solution, the names of the authors will be presented one above the other and a single affiliation is presented below.
The example code (in the template download and at page 10 of the manual) is
authorBen Trovato
emailtrovato@corporation.com
orcid1234-5678-9012
authorG.K.M. Tobin
emailwebmaster@marysville-ohio.com
affiliation%
institutionInstitute for Clarity in Documentation
streetaddressP.O. Box 1212
cityDublin
stateOhio
postcode43017-6221
The resulting block is like the following:
Other solution: Omit the reference block
However, if you wanna create a single author block, you may check other question at StackExchange.
- You can instruct the template to omit the ACM reference block using
settopmatterprintacmref=false
beforemaketitle
edited 50 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
JaimeJaime
39636
39636
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424066%2facmart-multiple-authors-all-with-same-affiliation-one-author-an-additional-af%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown