Monty Hall variation The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThe Monty Hall problemThe Monty Hall problemThree doors, one questionMonty Hall all over again?Simplist proof you have for the Monty Hall ProblemThe Monty Hall ArenaWhy is my car always in the slowest lane?Monty Hall Revisited: Winning Both Goats!Variation of Boy/Girl Birth Problem100 pieces 1 opportunity, choose wisely!
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
What are my rights when I have a Sparpreis ticket but can't board an overcrowded train?
Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
My cat is trying to eat and can't keep the food in his mouth
Spanish for "widget"
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
Seven sins, seven Wizards, seven symbols, seven times repeated, but six super-heroes
aging parents with no investments
Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
Monty Hall variation
get_users(...) only returns one user
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
Springs with some finite mass
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
Monty Hall variation
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThe Monty Hall problemThe Monty Hall problemThree doors, one questionMonty Hall all over again?Simplist proof you have for the Monty Hall ProblemThe Monty Hall ArenaWhy is my car always in the slowest lane?Monty Hall Revisited: Winning Both Goats!Variation of Boy/Girl Birth Problem100 pieces 1 opportunity, choose wisely!
$begingroup$
During a train trip I cooked up a semi-autobiographical variation of The Monty Hall problem for people who already know the original. Perhaps it is more of a meta-puzzle than a puzzle, but I hope it is suitable for this site. (At least it got some people disagreeing who knew the correct answer to the original quite well.) So here goes.
John M. is a television mogul who at Friday night watches a new game show, produced by one of his production companies and aired on one of his networks. In it the host, Monty Hall, shows the candidate three doors to choose from. Behind one is a car and behind the others are goats.
'Good', murmurs John. 'Two doors with goats, so 2/3 chance for the candidate to make the wrong choice. This will only cost me one car per three episodes on average. Very good.' But then something annoying happens: after the candidate has chosen a door, the host announces that he will always open one of the doors the candidate did not choose, and even more annoyingly, always a door with a goat behind it, after which the candidate can choose again.
'Aaaaargh!' Shouts John at the monitor. 'Does Monty think cars grow on the tree in my garden?! This will cost me at least one car every two shows! But this will not stand! I will tell Monty to stop this nonsense tomorrow first thing in the morning!'
So the next morning John takes the train to Delft (where Monty lives) to give him a stern talking to. After said talking, on his way back home, John arrives again at Delft station (see picture) and finds himself in the situation of needing to choose between two blue stairways: the rightmost stairway leading to platform 1 or the leftmost stairway leading to platform 2 and 3. Too busy to check his phone he takes the left stairway so that he has 2/3 chance for his train to arrive at a railway that is adjacent to where he is standing.
But then something annoying happens. John suddenly remembers that he arrived, earlier that morning, on platform 2 and hence his train will not return form that platform (as apparently trains on rail 2 travel away from his house instead of towards it) leaving platforms 1 and 3 as the only viable options for his train to arrive.
Question: is (considering losing a car 'as bad as' missing a train) this situation on Saturday equivalent to the situation on Friday, i.e. to the Monty Hall problem? If yes, should he change platforms? If no what is the difference?
probability monty-hall
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
During a train trip I cooked up a semi-autobiographical variation of The Monty Hall problem for people who already know the original. Perhaps it is more of a meta-puzzle than a puzzle, but I hope it is suitable for this site. (At least it got some people disagreeing who knew the correct answer to the original quite well.) So here goes.
John M. is a television mogul who at Friday night watches a new game show, produced by one of his production companies and aired on one of his networks. In it the host, Monty Hall, shows the candidate three doors to choose from. Behind one is a car and behind the others are goats.
'Good', murmurs John. 'Two doors with goats, so 2/3 chance for the candidate to make the wrong choice. This will only cost me one car per three episodes on average. Very good.' But then something annoying happens: after the candidate has chosen a door, the host announces that he will always open one of the doors the candidate did not choose, and even more annoyingly, always a door with a goat behind it, after which the candidate can choose again.
'Aaaaargh!' Shouts John at the monitor. 'Does Monty think cars grow on the tree in my garden?! This will cost me at least one car every two shows! But this will not stand! I will tell Monty to stop this nonsense tomorrow first thing in the morning!'
So the next morning John takes the train to Delft (where Monty lives) to give him a stern talking to. After said talking, on his way back home, John arrives again at Delft station (see picture) and finds himself in the situation of needing to choose between two blue stairways: the rightmost stairway leading to platform 1 or the leftmost stairway leading to platform 2 and 3. Too busy to check his phone he takes the left stairway so that he has 2/3 chance for his train to arrive at a railway that is adjacent to where he is standing.
But then something annoying happens. John suddenly remembers that he arrived, earlier that morning, on platform 2 and hence his train will not return form that platform (as apparently trains on rail 2 travel away from his house instead of towards it) leaving platforms 1 and 3 as the only viable options for his train to arrive.
Question: is (considering losing a car 'as bad as' missing a train) this situation on Saturday equivalent to the situation on Friday, i.e. to the Monty Hall problem? If yes, should he change platforms? If no what is the difference?
probability monty-hall
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
During a train trip I cooked up a semi-autobiographical variation of The Monty Hall problem for people who already know the original. Perhaps it is more of a meta-puzzle than a puzzle, but I hope it is suitable for this site. (At least it got some people disagreeing who knew the correct answer to the original quite well.) So here goes.
John M. is a television mogul who at Friday night watches a new game show, produced by one of his production companies and aired on one of his networks. In it the host, Monty Hall, shows the candidate three doors to choose from. Behind one is a car and behind the others are goats.
'Good', murmurs John. 'Two doors with goats, so 2/3 chance for the candidate to make the wrong choice. This will only cost me one car per three episodes on average. Very good.' But then something annoying happens: after the candidate has chosen a door, the host announces that he will always open one of the doors the candidate did not choose, and even more annoyingly, always a door with a goat behind it, after which the candidate can choose again.
'Aaaaargh!' Shouts John at the monitor. 'Does Monty think cars grow on the tree in my garden?! This will cost me at least one car every two shows! But this will not stand! I will tell Monty to stop this nonsense tomorrow first thing in the morning!'
So the next morning John takes the train to Delft (where Monty lives) to give him a stern talking to. After said talking, on his way back home, John arrives again at Delft station (see picture) and finds himself in the situation of needing to choose between two blue stairways: the rightmost stairway leading to platform 1 or the leftmost stairway leading to platform 2 and 3. Too busy to check his phone he takes the left stairway so that he has 2/3 chance for his train to arrive at a railway that is adjacent to where he is standing.
But then something annoying happens. John suddenly remembers that he arrived, earlier that morning, on platform 2 and hence his train will not return form that platform (as apparently trains on rail 2 travel away from his house instead of towards it) leaving platforms 1 and 3 as the only viable options for his train to arrive.
Question: is (considering losing a car 'as bad as' missing a train) this situation on Saturday equivalent to the situation on Friday, i.e. to the Monty Hall problem? If yes, should he change platforms? If no what is the difference?
probability monty-hall
New contributor
$endgroup$
During a train trip I cooked up a semi-autobiographical variation of The Monty Hall problem for people who already know the original. Perhaps it is more of a meta-puzzle than a puzzle, but I hope it is suitable for this site. (At least it got some people disagreeing who knew the correct answer to the original quite well.) So here goes.
John M. is a television mogul who at Friday night watches a new game show, produced by one of his production companies and aired on one of his networks. In it the host, Monty Hall, shows the candidate three doors to choose from. Behind one is a car and behind the others are goats.
'Good', murmurs John. 'Two doors with goats, so 2/3 chance for the candidate to make the wrong choice. This will only cost me one car per three episodes on average. Very good.' But then something annoying happens: after the candidate has chosen a door, the host announces that he will always open one of the doors the candidate did not choose, and even more annoyingly, always a door with a goat behind it, after which the candidate can choose again.
'Aaaaargh!' Shouts John at the monitor. 'Does Monty think cars grow on the tree in my garden?! This will cost me at least one car every two shows! But this will not stand! I will tell Monty to stop this nonsense tomorrow first thing in the morning!'
So the next morning John takes the train to Delft (where Monty lives) to give him a stern talking to. After said talking, on his way back home, John arrives again at Delft station (see picture) and finds himself in the situation of needing to choose between two blue stairways: the rightmost stairway leading to platform 1 or the leftmost stairway leading to platform 2 and 3. Too busy to check his phone he takes the left stairway so that he has 2/3 chance for his train to arrive at a railway that is adjacent to where he is standing.
But then something annoying happens. John suddenly remembers that he arrived, earlier that morning, on platform 2 and hence his train will not return form that platform (as apparently trains on rail 2 travel away from his house instead of towards it) leaving platforms 1 and 3 as the only viable options for his train to arrive.
Question: is (considering losing a car 'as bad as' missing a train) this situation on Saturday equivalent to the situation on Friday, i.e. to the Monty Hall problem? If yes, should he change platforms? If no what is the difference?
probability monty-hall
probability monty-hall
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 42 mins ago
VincentVincent
1213
1213
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's how the original Monty Hall worked:
You pick a door. (2/3 chance of it being a goat, 1/3 chance of it being a car)
Monty Hall opens a door that he knows has a goat in it, and then asks you if you'd like to switch to the other door.
2/3 of the time, the door Monty Hall opened is the only other door with a goat - because 2/3 of the time, you picked a goat with your first guess.
Thus, if you switch, the probability of getting a car is exactly 2/3. If you don't switch, the probability is the expected 1/3.
Here's how your situation works:
Let each track be a "door". Let the wrong tracks be "goats" and the right track be "the car".
You are allowed to pick either doors three and two or simply door one. You logically pick doors three and two, knowing that at least one of them is not correct. Knowing that door two is a "goat" does not give you an incentive to switch tracks. You already knew that at least one of them was going to be incorrect; however you didn't know which platform it would be. Now it's down to platforms 1 and 3 - a 50-50 chance.
Also,
As Gareth pointed out - there's no guarantee as to which platform you remembered, which is different from the original M, where it was always on a platform you didn't pick.
In conclusion,
The situations are completely different.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A difference between the Monty Hall scenario and the train platform scenario is that
Monty will always select a door the contestant didn't pick, whereas (if I'm understanding the train-platform scenario correctly) the platform you suddenly remember can't be the right one might be the one you're already on.
After you remember that the train will definitely not be leaving from platform 2,
it is equally likely (as far as your state of knowledge goes) to leave from platform 1 or from platform 2. So in the situation described -- where you are choosing between 1 and 2,3 -- you shouldn't care whether you switch or not. (So you might as well stay put and save yourself some walking.) This is not the same as in the Monty Hall situation, where the new information you gain from the host's revelation of a goat is enough to give you a 2/3 chance of winning if you switch, versus a 1/3 chance if you stay.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This situation:
Differs because initially he had a 2/3 chance of a good outcome and 1/3 chance of bad, which was then reduced to the 1/2 choice either way.
In Monty Hall it's a 2/3 chance of bad outcome and then 1/2 choice. So this situation would be similar to there being 2 cars and one of the car options being shown and removed.
If I remember correctly, in Monty Hall, the chance isn't actually 1/2, but a combination of 2/3 and 1/2 for the bad outcome that is slightly better than 2/3 but not as good as 1/2. >! Therefore in this slightly different situation, he shouldn't switch as it's the "opposite" of the first problem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Vincent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81569%2fmonty-hall-variation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's how the original Monty Hall worked:
You pick a door. (2/3 chance of it being a goat, 1/3 chance of it being a car)
Monty Hall opens a door that he knows has a goat in it, and then asks you if you'd like to switch to the other door.
2/3 of the time, the door Monty Hall opened is the only other door with a goat - because 2/3 of the time, you picked a goat with your first guess.
Thus, if you switch, the probability of getting a car is exactly 2/3. If you don't switch, the probability is the expected 1/3.
Here's how your situation works:
Let each track be a "door". Let the wrong tracks be "goats" and the right track be "the car".
You are allowed to pick either doors three and two or simply door one. You logically pick doors three and two, knowing that at least one of them is not correct. Knowing that door two is a "goat" does not give you an incentive to switch tracks. You already knew that at least one of them was going to be incorrect; however you didn't know which platform it would be. Now it's down to platforms 1 and 3 - a 50-50 chance.
Also,
As Gareth pointed out - there's no guarantee as to which platform you remembered, which is different from the original M, where it was always on a platform you didn't pick.
In conclusion,
The situations are completely different.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how the original Monty Hall worked:
You pick a door. (2/3 chance of it being a goat, 1/3 chance of it being a car)
Monty Hall opens a door that he knows has a goat in it, and then asks you if you'd like to switch to the other door.
2/3 of the time, the door Monty Hall opened is the only other door with a goat - because 2/3 of the time, you picked a goat with your first guess.
Thus, if you switch, the probability of getting a car is exactly 2/3. If you don't switch, the probability is the expected 1/3.
Here's how your situation works:
Let each track be a "door". Let the wrong tracks be "goats" and the right track be "the car".
You are allowed to pick either doors three and two or simply door one. You logically pick doors three and two, knowing that at least one of them is not correct. Knowing that door two is a "goat" does not give you an incentive to switch tracks. You already knew that at least one of them was going to be incorrect; however you didn't know which platform it would be. Now it's down to platforms 1 and 3 - a 50-50 chance.
Also,
As Gareth pointed out - there's no guarantee as to which platform you remembered, which is different from the original M, where it was always on a platform you didn't pick.
In conclusion,
The situations are completely different.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how the original Monty Hall worked:
You pick a door. (2/3 chance of it being a goat, 1/3 chance of it being a car)
Monty Hall opens a door that he knows has a goat in it, and then asks you if you'd like to switch to the other door.
2/3 of the time, the door Monty Hall opened is the only other door with a goat - because 2/3 of the time, you picked a goat with your first guess.
Thus, if you switch, the probability of getting a car is exactly 2/3. If you don't switch, the probability is the expected 1/3.
Here's how your situation works:
Let each track be a "door". Let the wrong tracks be "goats" and the right track be "the car".
You are allowed to pick either doors three and two or simply door one. You logically pick doors three and two, knowing that at least one of them is not correct. Knowing that door two is a "goat" does not give you an incentive to switch tracks. You already knew that at least one of them was going to be incorrect; however you didn't know which platform it would be. Now it's down to platforms 1 and 3 - a 50-50 chance.
Also,
As Gareth pointed out - there's no guarantee as to which platform you remembered, which is different from the original M, where it was always on a platform you didn't pick.
In conclusion,
The situations are completely different.
$endgroup$
Here's how the original Monty Hall worked:
You pick a door. (2/3 chance of it being a goat, 1/3 chance of it being a car)
Monty Hall opens a door that he knows has a goat in it, and then asks you if you'd like to switch to the other door.
2/3 of the time, the door Monty Hall opened is the only other door with a goat - because 2/3 of the time, you picked a goat with your first guess.
Thus, if you switch, the probability of getting a car is exactly 2/3. If you don't switch, the probability is the expected 1/3.
Here's how your situation works:
Let each track be a "door". Let the wrong tracks be "goats" and the right track be "the car".
You are allowed to pick either doors three and two or simply door one. You logically pick doors three and two, knowing that at least one of them is not correct. Knowing that door two is a "goat" does not give you an incentive to switch tracks. You already knew that at least one of them was going to be incorrect; however you didn't know which platform it would be. Now it's down to platforms 1 and 3 - a 50-50 chance.
Also,
As Gareth pointed out - there's no guarantee as to which platform you remembered, which is different from the original M, where it was always on a platform you didn't pick.
In conclusion,
The situations are completely different.
edited 5 mins ago
answered 14 mins ago
Brandon_JBrandon_J
3,602244
3,602244
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A difference between the Monty Hall scenario and the train platform scenario is that
Monty will always select a door the contestant didn't pick, whereas (if I'm understanding the train-platform scenario correctly) the platform you suddenly remember can't be the right one might be the one you're already on.
After you remember that the train will definitely not be leaving from platform 2,
it is equally likely (as far as your state of knowledge goes) to leave from platform 1 or from platform 2. So in the situation described -- where you are choosing between 1 and 2,3 -- you shouldn't care whether you switch or not. (So you might as well stay put and save yourself some walking.) This is not the same as in the Monty Hall situation, where the new information you gain from the host's revelation of a goat is enough to give you a 2/3 chance of winning if you switch, versus a 1/3 chance if you stay.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A difference between the Monty Hall scenario and the train platform scenario is that
Monty will always select a door the contestant didn't pick, whereas (if I'm understanding the train-platform scenario correctly) the platform you suddenly remember can't be the right one might be the one you're already on.
After you remember that the train will definitely not be leaving from platform 2,
it is equally likely (as far as your state of knowledge goes) to leave from platform 1 or from platform 2. So in the situation described -- where you are choosing between 1 and 2,3 -- you shouldn't care whether you switch or not. (So you might as well stay put and save yourself some walking.) This is not the same as in the Monty Hall situation, where the new information you gain from the host's revelation of a goat is enough to give you a 2/3 chance of winning if you switch, versus a 1/3 chance if you stay.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A difference between the Monty Hall scenario and the train platform scenario is that
Monty will always select a door the contestant didn't pick, whereas (if I'm understanding the train-platform scenario correctly) the platform you suddenly remember can't be the right one might be the one you're already on.
After you remember that the train will definitely not be leaving from platform 2,
it is equally likely (as far as your state of knowledge goes) to leave from platform 1 or from platform 2. So in the situation described -- where you are choosing between 1 and 2,3 -- you shouldn't care whether you switch or not. (So you might as well stay put and save yourself some walking.) This is not the same as in the Monty Hall situation, where the new information you gain from the host's revelation of a goat is enough to give you a 2/3 chance of winning if you switch, versus a 1/3 chance if you stay.
$endgroup$
A difference between the Monty Hall scenario and the train platform scenario is that
Monty will always select a door the contestant didn't pick, whereas (if I'm understanding the train-platform scenario correctly) the platform you suddenly remember can't be the right one might be the one you're already on.
After you remember that the train will definitely not be leaving from platform 2,
it is equally likely (as far as your state of knowledge goes) to leave from platform 1 or from platform 2. So in the situation described -- where you are choosing between 1 and 2,3 -- you shouldn't care whether you switch or not. (So you might as well stay put and save yourself some walking.) This is not the same as in the Monty Hall situation, where the new information you gain from the host's revelation of a goat is enough to give you a 2/3 chance of winning if you switch, versus a 1/3 chance if you stay.
answered 18 mins ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
67k3169260
67k3169260
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm getting this paranoid feeling that the end result isn't 50/50, even though that's what I put in my answer, too. Gonna run a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This situation:
Differs because initially he had a 2/3 chance of a good outcome and 1/3 chance of bad, which was then reduced to the 1/2 choice either way.
In Monty Hall it's a 2/3 chance of bad outcome and then 1/2 choice. So this situation would be similar to there being 2 cars and one of the car options being shown and removed.
If I remember correctly, in Monty Hall, the chance isn't actually 1/2, but a combination of 2/3 and 1/2 for the bad outcome that is slightly better than 2/3 but not as good as 1/2. >! Therefore in this slightly different situation, he shouldn't switch as it's the "opposite" of the first problem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This situation:
Differs because initially he had a 2/3 chance of a good outcome and 1/3 chance of bad, which was then reduced to the 1/2 choice either way.
In Monty Hall it's a 2/3 chance of bad outcome and then 1/2 choice. So this situation would be similar to there being 2 cars and one of the car options being shown and removed.
If I remember correctly, in Monty Hall, the chance isn't actually 1/2, but a combination of 2/3 and 1/2 for the bad outcome that is slightly better than 2/3 but not as good as 1/2. >! Therefore in this slightly different situation, he shouldn't switch as it's the "opposite" of the first problem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This situation:
Differs because initially he had a 2/3 chance of a good outcome and 1/3 chance of bad, which was then reduced to the 1/2 choice either way.
In Monty Hall it's a 2/3 chance of bad outcome and then 1/2 choice. So this situation would be similar to there being 2 cars and one of the car options being shown and removed.
If I remember correctly, in Monty Hall, the chance isn't actually 1/2, but a combination of 2/3 and 1/2 for the bad outcome that is slightly better than 2/3 but not as good as 1/2. >! Therefore in this slightly different situation, he shouldn't switch as it's the "opposite" of the first problem.
$endgroup$
This situation:
Differs because initially he had a 2/3 chance of a good outcome and 1/3 chance of bad, which was then reduced to the 1/2 choice either way.
In Monty Hall it's a 2/3 chance of bad outcome and then 1/2 choice. So this situation would be similar to there being 2 cars and one of the car options being shown and removed.
If I remember correctly, in Monty Hall, the chance isn't actually 1/2, but a combination of 2/3 and 1/2 for the bad outcome that is slightly better than 2/3 but not as good as 1/2. >! Therefore in this slightly different situation, he shouldn't switch as it's the "opposite" of the first problem.
answered 34 mins ago
AHKieranAHKieran
5,5571144
5,5571144
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
In the original Monty Hall, the probability of getting a car after switching was exactly two-thirds.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Vincent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vincent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vincent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vincent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81569%2fmonty-hall-variation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown