How to read the value of this capacitor?Can I choose different value capacitor?Current Ripple in Ceramic Capacitor SelectionCalculation for the Boot Strap capacitorCan a single, large multilayer ceramic capacitor replace the classic electrolytic + ceramic decoupling capacitor arrangement?What's the relationship between capacitor and resistance in a fading LED circuit with a 555 timer?How to avoid a electrolytic capacitor on a (audio) signal path?How do I connect up a replacement run capacitorBoost Converter (TPS61322): Loop Stability with Large CapacitorsCapacitor in parallel with a resistor between live and full bridge rectifierWorking of NMOS as a capacitor
Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?
Are there other languages, besides English, where the indefinite (or definite) article varies based on sound?
How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?
Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?
Why does Bach not break the rules here?
A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:
How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight
What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?
Interplanetary conflict, some disease destroys the ability to understand or appreciate music
Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
Is there a data structure that only stores hash codes and not the actual objects?
Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?
Can a druid choose the size of its wild shape beast?
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
My Graph Theory Students
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
My adviser wants to be the first author
Sailing the cryptic seas
Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?
How to read the value of this capacitor?
Can I choose different value capacitor?Current Ripple in Ceramic Capacitor SelectionCalculation for the Boot Strap capacitorCan a single, large multilayer ceramic capacitor replace the classic electrolytic + ceramic decoupling capacitor arrangement?What's the relationship between capacitor and resistance in a fading LED circuit with a 555 timer?How to avoid a electrolytic capacitor on a (audio) signal path?How do I connect up a replacement run capacitorBoost Converter (TPS61322): Loop Stability with Large CapacitorsCapacitor in parallel with a resistor between live and full bridge rectifierWorking of NMOS as a capacitor
$begingroup$
I came across this capacitor in a voltage converter which was converting 9V to 5V. This capacitor was connected at the output of M7805CT (i.e. between the 5V and common terminal) in parallel to another 470μF electrolytic capacitor. I cannot find a definite value of this capacitor. Different websites are providing different values of this coded capacitor. Here is the screenshot of what google search returned.
Please help in decoding the value of this capacitor.
capacitor
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I came across this capacitor in a voltage converter which was converting 9V to 5V. This capacitor was connected at the output of M7805CT (i.e. between the 5V and common terminal) in parallel to another 470μF electrolytic capacitor. I cannot find a definite value of this capacitor. Different websites are providing different values of this coded capacitor. Here is the screenshot of what google search returned.
Please help in decoding the value of this capacitor.
capacitor
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I came across this capacitor in a voltage converter which was converting 9V to 5V. This capacitor was connected at the output of M7805CT (i.e. between the 5V and common terminal) in parallel to another 470μF electrolytic capacitor. I cannot find a definite value of this capacitor. Different websites are providing different values of this coded capacitor. Here is the screenshot of what google search returned.
Please help in decoding the value of this capacitor.
capacitor
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I came across this capacitor in a voltage converter which was converting 9V to 5V. This capacitor was connected at the output of M7805CT (i.e. between the 5V and common terminal) in parallel to another 470μF electrolytic capacitor. I cannot find a definite value of this capacitor. Different websites are providing different values of this coded capacitor. Here is the screenshot of what google search returned.
Please help in decoding the value of this capacitor.
capacitor
capacitor
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
asked 10 hours ago
JigarJigar
361
361
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jigar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
0.1uF (100nF) +/-5% tolerance (J), 100VDC rating.
It's a polyester (probably) film capacitor.
Here is a similar type of capacitor (maybe the same type) from Kemet.
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sphero Pefhany already provided the correct answer. Also check the comments below this answer.
The capacitors you mention are NOT using the default capacitor code, which normally is 3 digits for the value followed by one character for the tolerance, and optionally prefixed by a multiplier.
In this link there is a table: Capacitor-Codes
And at the bottom is an additional description (which do not apply your capacitor).
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Jigar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427402%2fhow-to-read-the-value-of-this-capacitor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
0.1uF (100nF) +/-5% tolerance (J), 100VDC rating.
It's a polyester (probably) film capacitor.
Here is a similar type of capacitor (maybe the same type) from Kemet.
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
0.1uF (100nF) +/-5% tolerance (J), 100VDC rating.
It's a polyester (probably) film capacitor.
Here is a similar type of capacitor (maybe the same type) from Kemet.
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
0.1uF (100nF) +/-5% tolerance (J), 100VDC rating.
It's a polyester (probably) film capacitor.
Here is a similar type of capacitor (maybe the same type) from Kemet.
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
$endgroup$
0.1uF (100nF) +/-5% tolerance (J), 100VDC rating.
It's a polyester (probably) film capacitor.
Here is a similar type of capacitor (maybe the same type) from Kemet.
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
edited 9 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
answered 10 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
210k5161425
210k5161425
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sphero Pefhany already provided the correct answer. Also check the comments below this answer.
The capacitors you mention are NOT using the default capacitor code, which normally is 3 digits for the value followed by one character for the tolerance, and optionally prefixed by a multiplier.
In this link there is a table: Capacitor-Codes
And at the bottom is an additional description (which do not apply your capacitor).
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Sphero Pefhany already provided the correct answer. Also check the comments below this answer.
The capacitors you mention are NOT using the default capacitor code, which normally is 3 digits for the value followed by one character for the tolerance, and optionally prefixed by a multiplier.
In this link there is a table: Capacitor-Codes
And at the bottom is an additional description (which do not apply your capacitor).
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Sphero Pefhany already provided the correct answer. Also check the comments below this answer.
The capacitors you mention are NOT using the default capacitor code, which normally is 3 digits for the value followed by one character for the tolerance, and optionally prefixed by a multiplier.
In this link there is a table: Capacitor-Codes
And at the bottom is an additional description (which do not apply your capacitor).
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
$endgroup$
Sphero Pefhany already provided the correct answer. Also check the comments below this answer.
The capacitors you mention are NOT using the default capacitor code, which normally is 3 digits for the value followed by one character for the tolerance, and optionally prefixed by a multiplier.
In this link there is a table: Capacitor-Codes
And at the bottom is an additional description (which do not apply your capacitor).
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
edited 4 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
answered 9 hours ago
Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers
6,51092968
6,51092968
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
This isn't too helpful for this particular capacitor though. This one is labelled differently to the table in your link. The capacitor in the question is 100nF, or 0.1µF. According to your link, this should have a code of 104 (which, to be fair, the majority of capacitors do!), so while this link is good for finding values on the majority of capacitors, it is not much use for this particular one (with the exception of tolerance).
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
it is partly useful how to read reputable sources that standardize codes and have their brand icon or name on their parts. These cheap parts have none of these quality indicators. does not deserve a down vote @MCG These suppliers are so cheap they can't even afford a leading 0
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 my downvote was based on the fact that this answer does not correspond to this particular question. If it was an answer to a question about standardised capacitor codes, it would have certainly got an upvote. I cast my votes based on how well the answer actually answers the question being asked. However, I always leave a comment explaining my reasoning, and if it is fixed, my vote will usually change. I personally believe this is a good way of voting, I am not one to downvote and leave. I think most users would appreciate this, as I do for people who help me improve my answers
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I appreciate those who improve answer more that criticize it
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichelKeijzers there is no need to delete it. As I explained in my previous comment, I have given my reason for the downvote, which is not meant in a bad way. It is to give you my reasoning so that the answer can be edited and/or improved. I think my reasoning was quite appropriate
$endgroup$
– MCG
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Jigar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jigar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jigar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jigar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427402%2fhow-to-read-the-value-of-this-capacitor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How about measuring the capacitance?
$endgroup$
– Cecil - W5DXP
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Distributors often use the same photo for capacitors of different value.
$endgroup$
– Steve G
10 hours ago