Why LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are often been ignored?First FAQ section: What kind of questions can I ask here?Is LyX an editor which should be recommended?About the possibility to save the “answer” in pdf formatWhy is short and specific questions required as stated in FAQ?Should 'how to install package X on Ubuntu' questions be consolidated?Speaking of LaTeX editorsFlagging obviously wrong answers?Adding the “accepted” mark to a question or to a commentLyX Specific PostsIs a question on setting up a CTAN mirror on-topic?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Awsome yet unlucky path traversal

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

My Graph Theory Students

Time travel from stationary position?

What is a^b and (a&b)<<1?

Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries

Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?

Is there a data structure that only stores hash codes and not the actual objects?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

Unexpected result from ArcLength

How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?

Can someone explain to me where this proof goes wrong? (Twin Prime Conjecture)

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?

Who is flying the vertibirds?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

How to simplify this time periods definition interface?

How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?



Why LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are often been ignored?


First FAQ section: What kind of questions can I ask here?Is LyX an editor which should be recommended?About the possibility to save the “answer” in pdf formatWhy is short and specific questions required as stated in FAQ?Should 'how to install package X on Ubuntu' questions be consolidated?Speaking of LaTeX editorsFlagging obviously wrong answers?Adding the “accepted” mark to a question or to a commentLyX Specific PostsIs a question on setting up a CTAN mirror on-topic?













4















LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are not really been answered so often as a post that is specific to a real LaTeX editor (non WYSIWYG) or even most if the post is not specific to an editor but to LaTeX distros or to LaTeX (The Last case is the best in order of the possibility to get an answer).



The situation is almost like questions about installing Kali Linux in unix.stackexchange.com ... (And I mean that you have much less possibilities to get an answer when the question is not just tagged as LyX question, but when it is real LyX specific.



PS: Of course I can understand why, and I am tending to answer myself since I didn't found such a question here.









share













migrated from tex.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems.


















  • If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

    – John Kormylo
    1 hour ago
















4















LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are not really been answered so often as a post that is specific to a real LaTeX editor (non WYSIWYG) or even most if the post is not specific to an editor but to LaTeX distros or to LaTeX (The Last case is the best in order of the possibility to get an answer).



The situation is almost like questions about installing Kali Linux in unix.stackexchange.com ... (And I mean that you have much less possibilities to get an answer when the question is not just tagged as LyX question, but when it is real LyX specific.



PS: Of course I can understand why, and I am tending to answer myself since I didn't found such a question here.









share













migrated from tex.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems.


















  • If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

    – John Kormylo
    1 hour ago














4












4








4








LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are not really been answered so often as a post that is specific to a real LaTeX editor (non WYSIWYG) or even most if the post is not specific to an editor but to LaTeX distros or to LaTeX (The Last case is the best in order of the possibility to get an answer).



The situation is almost like questions about installing Kali Linux in unix.stackexchange.com ... (And I mean that you have much less possibilities to get an answer when the question is not just tagged as LyX question, but when it is real LyX specific.



PS: Of course I can understand why, and I am tending to answer myself since I didn't found such a question here.









share














LyX specific posts on tex.stackexchange.com are not really been answered so often as a post that is specific to a real LaTeX editor (non WYSIWYG) or even most if the post is not specific to an editor but to LaTeX distros or to LaTeX (The Last case is the best in order of the possibility to get an answer).



The situation is almost like questions about installing Kali Linux in unix.stackexchange.com ... (And I mean that you have much less possibilities to get an answer when the question is not just tagged as LyX question, but when it is real LyX specific.



PS: Of course I can understand why, and I am tending to answer myself since I didn't found such a question here.







discussion





share












share










share



share










asked 9 hours ago









koleygrkoleygr

12.6k28




12.6k28




migrated from tex.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems.









migrated from tex.stackexchange.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems.














  • If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

    – John Kormylo
    1 hour ago


















  • If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

    – John Kormylo
    1 hour ago

















If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

– John Kormylo
1 hour ago






If you don't use LyX, there really i no point in answering LyX specific questions (or even knowing if the question is LyX specific or not). See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283272/… for example.

– John Kormylo
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4















  1. LaTeX is a typesetting system that (initially) was designed to give a nice layout (ready to be printed and to be published) without the creator of the document need to take special care about the output during his work. It supposed to make its own calculations by the internal compiling procedure and give an already beautiful result (but of course adjustable with many ways).

As such a system, the "WYSIWYG" approach seems to be completely inappropriate for it. The result after the compilation should be better that "what you see".



  1. LyX is an approach of LaTeX typesetting that is preferred mostly by newcomers to LaTeX world. Mostly from people that can't (or don't want) get over the "Office" habit and in most cases they want to "force" their document to "look like LaTeX" but without the "real coding part" of creating a LaTeX document.


  2. Any LaTeX user that will use LaTeX more than once or twice will expect to have something more specific than the default LyX abilities by pressing buttons, and will possibly come here to get an answer on how to accomplish this specific layout or behavior etc. So, the LyX user will have to use the non-graphical interface of LyX to add some real code hopping that the LyX will afford this code and will result a document behavior like if this code had been added to a "real" LaTeX document. (But as far as I have seen here... this is not always the case).


In any result of the above situation, surely (s)he will need again and again such a help and thus will be driven to learn at least some basic LaTeX commands in order to not make again and again the same question with just another variable/command/whatever. But then, by gaining soem basic skills in real LaTeX coding and getting to know how more abilities LaTeX "coding-approach" is offering, (s)he getting over the bad habit of the WYSIWYG approach and becoming a LaTeX user from a LyX user.



So, there are not really many people here familiar with LyX that are able to help in questions specific to LyX and in most cases their answer is a general LaTeX answer by using the "code-mode" of LyX and the hope that it should/could work.



If the question is LyX specific, there are people that could help, but they possibly didn't needed much from tex.stackexchange.com and they are not active here, or they have already forgot the LyX interface as "ex-LyX" users





share






























    3














    I know there are stats and there are statistics but just doing a very simple query on editor tags and I do agree wholeheartedly that it is not a fair test since it is skewed to comparing the IDE tags not the TeX methodology of the OP



    [lyx]



    https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=newest&pageSize=50
    returns 2,467 questions
    whilst unanswered
    https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 gives 285 questions



    [texmaker]



    https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=newest&pageSize=50 shows 1170

    whilst unanswered
    https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 shows 245



    Without looking deeper, that on its own would suggest LyX gets a better answer ratio approx. double that of Texmaker. However if we count in RECENT 50 for each it is 28/50 unanswered LyX versus 23/50 unanswered Texmaker suggesting that one might observe a more recent decline in LyX answers





    share























    • Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

      – koleygr
      5 hours ago


















    0














    Apart from the question raised by KJO whether the data really substantiates the claim that Lyx is being often ignored, I would not be too surprised if Lyx questions tend to be less answered than questions other topics. The reason could be as simple as the fact that among the more expert users, i.e. the users that tend to answer the majority of questions, not too many are using Lyx. This is clearly speculative, but I have a hard time imagining that @egreg or David Carlisle, say, use Lyx to prepare their documents.





    share






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4















      1. LaTeX is a typesetting system that (initially) was designed to give a nice layout (ready to be printed and to be published) without the creator of the document need to take special care about the output during his work. It supposed to make its own calculations by the internal compiling procedure and give an already beautiful result (but of course adjustable with many ways).

      As such a system, the "WYSIWYG" approach seems to be completely inappropriate for it. The result after the compilation should be better that "what you see".



      1. LyX is an approach of LaTeX typesetting that is preferred mostly by newcomers to LaTeX world. Mostly from people that can't (or don't want) get over the "Office" habit and in most cases they want to "force" their document to "look like LaTeX" but without the "real coding part" of creating a LaTeX document.


      2. Any LaTeX user that will use LaTeX more than once or twice will expect to have something more specific than the default LyX abilities by pressing buttons, and will possibly come here to get an answer on how to accomplish this specific layout or behavior etc. So, the LyX user will have to use the non-graphical interface of LyX to add some real code hopping that the LyX will afford this code and will result a document behavior like if this code had been added to a "real" LaTeX document. (But as far as I have seen here... this is not always the case).


      In any result of the above situation, surely (s)he will need again and again such a help and thus will be driven to learn at least some basic LaTeX commands in order to not make again and again the same question with just another variable/command/whatever. But then, by gaining soem basic skills in real LaTeX coding and getting to know how more abilities LaTeX "coding-approach" is offering, (s)he getting over the bad habit of the WYSIWYG approach and becoming a LaTeX user from a LyX user.



      So, there are not really many people here familiar with LyX that are able to help in questions specific to LyX and in most cases their answer is a general LaTeX answer by using the "code-mode" of LyX and the hope that it should/could work.



      If the question is LyX specific, there are people that could help, but they possibly didn't needed much from tex.stackexchange.com and they are not active here, or they have already forgot the LyX interface as "ex-LyX" users





      share



























        4















        1. LaTeX is a typesetting system that (initially) was designed to give a nice layout (ready to be printed and to be published) without the creator of the document need to take special care about the output during his work. It supposed to make its own calculations by the internal compiling procedure and give an already beautiful result (but of course adjustable with many ways).

        As such a system, the "WYSIWYG" approach seems to be completely inappropriate for it. The result after the compilation should be better that "what you see".



        1. LyX is an approach of LaTeX typesetting that is preferred mostly by newcomers to LaTeX world. Mostly from people that can't (or don't want) get over the "Office" habit and in most cases they want to "force" their document to "look like LaTeX" but without the "real coding part" of creating a LaTeX document.


        2. Any LaTeX user that will use LaTeX more than once or twice will expect to have something more specific than the default LyX abilities by pressing buttons, and will possibly come here to get an answer on how to accomplish this specific layout or behavior etc. So, the LyX user will have to use the non-graphical interface of LyX to add some real code hopping that the LyX will afford this code and will result a document behavior like if this code had been added to a "real" LaTeX document. (But as far as I have seen here... this is not always the case).


        In any result of the above situation, surely (s)he will need again and again such a help and thus will be driven to learn at least some basic LaTeX commands in order to not make again and again the same question with just another variable/command/whatever. But then, by gaining soem basic skills in real LaTeX coding and getting to know how more abilities LaTeX "coding-approach" is offering, (s)he getting over the bad habit of the WYSIWYG approach and becoming a LaTeX user from a LyX user.



        So, there are not really many people here familiar with LyX that are able to help in questions specific to LyX and in most cases their answer is a general LaTeX answer by using the "code-mode" of LyX and the hope that it should/could work.



        If the question is LyX specific, there are people that could help, but they possibly didn't needed much from tex.stackexchange.com and they are not active here, or they have already forgot the LyX interface as "ex-LyX" users





        share

























          4












          4








          4








          1. LaTeX is a typesetting system that (initially) was designed to give a nice layout (ready to be printed and to be published) without the creator of the document need to take special care about the output during his work. It supposed to make its own calculations by the internal compiling procedure and give an already beautiful result (but of course adjustable with many ways).

          As such a system, the "WYSIWYG" approach seems to be completely inappropriate for it. The result after the compilation should be better that "what you see".



          1. LyX is an approach of LaTeX typesetting that is preferred mostly by newcomers to LaTeX world. Mostly from people that can't (or don't want) get over the "Office" habit and in most cases they want to "force" their document to "look like LaTeX" but without the "real coding part" of creating a LaTeX document.


          2. Any LaTeX user that will use LaTeX more than once or twice will expect to have something more specific than the default LyX abilities by pressing buttons, and will possibly come here to get an answer on how to accomplish this specific layout or behavior etc. So, the LyX user will have to use the non-graphical interface of LyX to add some real code hopping that the LyX will afford this code and will result a document behavior like if this code had been added to a "real" LaTeX document. (But as far as I have seen here... this is not always the case).


          In any result of the above situation, surely (s)he will need again and again such a help and thus will be driven to learn at least some basic LaTeX commands in order to not make again and again the same question with just another variable/command/whatever. But then, by gaining soem basic skills in real LaTeX coding and getting to know how more abilities LaTeX "coding-approach" is offering, (s)he getting over the bad habit of the WYSIWYG approach and becoming a LaTeX user from a LyX user.



          So, there are not really many people here familiar with LyX that are able to help in questions specific to LyX and in most cases their answer is a general LaTeX answer by using the "code-mode" of LyX and the hope that it should/could work.



          If the question is LyX specific, there are people that could help, but they possibly didn't needed much from tex.stackexchange.com and they are not active here, or they have already forgot the LyX interface as "ex-LyX" users





          share














          1. LaTeX is a typesetting system that (initially) was designed to give a nice layout (ready to be printed and to be published) without the creator of the document need to take special care about the output during his work. It supposed to make its own calculations by the internal compiling procedure and give an already beautiful result (but of course adjustable with many ways).

          As such a system, the "WYSIWYG" approach seems to be completely inappropriate for it. The result after the compilation should be better that "what you see".



          1. LyX is an approach of LaTeX typesetting that is preferred mostly by newcomers to LaTeX world. Mostly from people that can't (or don't want) get over the "Office" habit and in most cases they want to "force" their document to "look like LaTeX" but without the "real coding part" of creating a LaTeX document.


          2. Any LaTeX user that will use LaTeX more than once or twice will expect to have something more specific than the default LyX abilities by pressing buttons, and will possibly come here to get an answer on how to accomplish this specific layout or behavior etc. So, the LyX user will have to use the non-graphical interface of LyX to add some real code hopping that the LyX will afford this code and will result a document behavior like if this code had been added to a "real" LaTeX document. (But as far as I have seen here... this is not always the case).


          In any result of the above situation, surely (s)he will need again and again such a help and thus will be driven to learn at least some basic LaTeX commands in order to not make again and again the same question with just another variable/command/whatever. But then, by gaining soem basic skills in real LaTeX coding and getting to know how more abilities LaTeX "coding-approach" is offering, (s)he getting over the bad habit of the WYSIWYG approach and becoming a LaTeX user from a LyX user.



          So, there are not really many people here familiar with LyX that are able to help in questions specific to LyX and in most cases their answer is a general LaTeX answer by using the "code-mode" of LyX and the hope that it should/could work.



          If the question is LyX specific, there are people that could help, but they possibly didn't needed much from tex.stackexchange.com and they are not active here, or they have already forgot the LyX interface as "ex-LyX" users






          share











          share


          share










          answered 9 hours ago









          koleygrkoleygr

          12.6k28




          12.6k28





















              3














              I know there are stats and there are statistics but just doing a very simple query on editor tags and I do agree wholeheartedly that it is not a fair test since it is skewed to comparing the IDE tags not the TeX methodology of the OP



              [lyx]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=newest&pageSize=50
              returns 2,467 questions
              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 gives 285 questions



              [texmaker]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=newest&pageSize=50 shows 1170

              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 shows 245



              Without looking deeper, that on its own would suggest LyX gets a better answer ratio approx. double that of Texmaker. However if we count in RECENT 50 for each it is 28/50 unanswered LyX versus 23/50 unanswered Texmaker suggesting that one might observe a more recent decline in LyX answers





              share























              • Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

                – koleygr
                5 hours ago















              3














              I know there are stats and there are statistics but just doing a very simple query on editor tags and I do agree wholeheartedly that it is not a fair test since it is skewed to comparing the IDE tags not the TeX methodology of the OP



              [lyx]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=newest&pageSize=50
              returns 2,467 questions
              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 gives 285 questions



              [texmaker]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=newest&pageSize=50 shows 1170

              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 shows 245



              Without looking deeper, that on its own would suggest LyX gets a better answer ratio approx. double that of Texmaker. However if we count in RECENT 50 for each it is 28/50 unanswered LyX versus 23/50 unanswered Texmaker suggesting that one might observe a more recent decline in LyX answers





              share























              • Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

                – koleygr
                5 hours ago













              3












              3








              3







              I know there are stats and there are statistics but just doing a very simple query on editor tags and I do agree wholeheartedly that it is not a fair test since it is skewed to comparing the IDE tags not the TeX methodology of the OP



              [lyx]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=newest&pageSize=50
              returns 2,467 questions
              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 gives 285 questions



              [texmaker]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=newest&pageSize=50 shows 1170

              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 shows 245



              Without looking deeper, that on its own would suggest LyX gets a better answer ratio approx. double that of Texmaker. However if we count in RECENT 50 for each it is 28/50 unanswered LyX versus 23/50 unanswered Texmaker suggesting that one might observe a more recent decline in LyX answers





              share













              I know there are stats and there are statistics but just doing a very simple query on editor tags and I do agree wholeheartedly that it is not a fair test since it is skewed to comparing the IDE tags not the TeX methodology of the OP



              [lyx]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=newest&pageSize=50
              returns 2,467 questions
              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lyx?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 gives 285 questions



              [texmaker]



              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=newest&pageSize=50 shows 1170

              whilst unanswered
              https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/texmaker?sort=unanswered&pageSize=50 shows 245



              Without looking deeper, that on its own would suggest LyX gets a better answer ratio approx. double that of Texmaker. However if we count in RECENT 50 for each it is 28/50 unanswered LyX versus 23/50 unanswered Texmaker suggesting that one might observe a more recent decline in LyX answers






              share











              share


              share










              answered 5 hours ago









              KJOKJO

              2,9838




              2,9838












              • Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

                – koleygr
                5 hours ago

















              • Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

                – koleygr
                5 hours ago
















              Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

              – koleygr
              5 hours ago





              Thanks for the answer, interesting! I am going to look further in these stats, because my first thought was that the answers that lyx are mostly LaTeX answers and thus the question is not really LyX specific. But can't tell this before taking in account a big part of the questions neither can say that the TeXmaker tagged questions have TeXmaker specific answers. I will have a closer look and upvote yours/downvote mine if these stats still holds. (Another approach: I could open one LyX question about things that LyX can't do and give a clear statistical advantage to my question/answer :P)

              – koleygr
              5 hours ago











              0














              Apart from the question raised by KJO whether the data really substantiates the claim that Lyx is being often ignored, I would not be too surprised if Lyx questions tend to be less answered than questions other topics. The reason could be as simple as the fact that among the more expert users, i.e. the users that tend to answer the majority of questions, not too many are using Lyx. This is clearly speculative, but I have a hard time imagining that @egreg or David Carlisle, say, use Lyx to prepare their documents.





              share



























                0














                Apart from the question raised by KJO whether the data really substantiates the claim that Lyx is being often ignored, I would not be too surprised if Lyx questions tend to be less answered than questions other topics. The reason could be as simple as the fact that among the more expert users, i.e. the users that tend to answer the majority of questions, not too many are using Lyx. This is clearly speculative, but I have a hard time imagining that @egreg or David Carlisle, say, use Lyx to prepare their documents.





                share

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Apart from the question raised by KJO whether the data really substantiates the claim that Lyx is being often ignored, I would not be too surprised if Lyx questions tend to be less answered than questions other topics. The reason could be as simple as the fact that among the more expert users, i.e. the users that tend to answer the majority of questions, not too many are using Lyx. This is clearly speculative, but I have a hard time imagining that @egreg or David Carlisle, say, use Lyx to prepare their documents.





                  share













                  Apart from the question raised by KJO whether the data really substantiates the claim that Lyx is being often ignored, I would not be too surprised if Lyx questions tend to be less answered than questions other topics. The reason could be as simple as the fact that among the more expert users, i.e. the users that tend to answer the majority of questions, not too many are using Lyx. This is clearly speculative, but I have a hard time imagining that @egreg or David Carlisle, say, use Lyx to prepare their documents.






                  share











                  share


                  share










                  answered 22 mins ago









                  marmotmarmot

                  108k525




                  108k525













                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

                      Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

                      Haugesund Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisHaugesund pagina interretialisAmplifica