ETF asterisk clause meaningUS or UK based ETF Index funds for UK investor?Must ETF companies match an investor's amount invested in an ETF?Is there an ETF/index fund respecting my individual ethical preferences?What's the simplest, cheapest way to reproduce the WMA private investor indices's “income index”?Difference between Bull and Bear 2X ETF?How does the market adjust for fees in ETPs?Risk of basic (Bull 1x) ETFWhy does the price of the basic (Bull 1x) index ETF fluctuate intra-day?ETF annual expense ratio: how to calculate on a portfolio?How exactly does a broad-market ETF work?
A Cautionary Suggestion
Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?
Gantt Chart like rectangles with log scale
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
How to read the value of this capacitor?
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17
Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?
It's a yearly task, alright
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
Why does Bach not break the rules here?
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day
How does the Sleep spell interact with the Aspect of the Moon eldritch invocation?
Who is flying the vertibirds?
How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?
How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?
SOQL: Populate a Literal List in WHERE IN Clause
How to terminate ping <dest> &
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
How to use deus ex machina safely?
How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight
My adviser wants to be the first author
ETF asterisk clause meaning
US or UK based ETF Index funds for UK investor?Must ETF companies match an investor's amount invested in an ETF?Is there an ETF/index fund respecting my individual ethical preferences?What's the simplest, cheapest way to reproduce the WMA private investor indices's “income index”?Difference between Bull and Bear 2X ETF?How does the market adjust for fees in ETPs?Risk of basic (Bull 1x) ETFWhy does the price of the basic (Bull 1x) index ETF fluctuate intra-day?ETF annual expense ratio: how to calculate on a portfolio?How exactly does a broad-market ETF work?
I'm choosing an ETF, and reading this KII document, I'm not sure what this sentence means.
- Can anybody expand this language with an example?
- Is this typical for an ETF?
To the extent the Fund undertakes securities lending to reduce costs,
the Fund will receive 62.5% of the associated revenue generated and
the remaining
37.5% will be received by BlackRock as the securities lending agent. As securities lending revenue sharing does not increase the costs of
running the Fund, this has been excluded from the ongoing charges.
Source
investing etf index-fund lending documents
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm choosing an ETF, and reading this KII document, I'm not sure what this sentence means.
- Can anybody expand this language with an example?
- Is this typical for an ETF?
To the extent the Fund undertakes securities lending to reduce costs,
the Fund will receive 62.5% of the associated revenue generated and
the remaining
37.5% will be received by BlackRock as the securities lending agent. As securities lending revenue sharing does not increase the costs of
running the Fund, this has been excluded from the ongoing charges.
Source
investing etf index-fund lending documents
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm choosing an ETF, and reading this KII document, I'm not sure what this sentence means.
- Can anybody expand this language with an example?
- Is this typical for an ETF?
To the extent the Fund undertakes securities lending to reduce costs,
the Fund will receive 62.5% of the associated revenue generated and
the remaining
37.5% will be received by BlackRock as the securities lending agent. As securities lending revenue sharing does not increase the costs of
running the Fund, this has been excluded from the ongoing charges.
Source
investing etf index-fund lending documents
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm choosing an ETF, and reading this KII document, I'm not sure what this sentence means.
- Can anybody expand this language with an example?
- Is this typical for an ETF?
To the extent the Fund undertakes securities lending to reduce costs,
the Fund will receive 62.5% of the associated revenue generated and
the remaining
37.5% will be received by BlackRock as the securities lending agent. As securities lending revenue sharing does not increase the costs of
running the Fund, this has been excluded from the ongoing charges.
Source
investing etf index-fund lending documents
investing etf index-fund lending documents
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
edited 13 hours ago
Ben Miller
80.5k20220288
80.5k20220288
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
asked 14 hours ago
sscarduziosscarduzio
1162
1162
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
sscarduzio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The quote you are asking about is a footnote to the fund expenses/fees, which is listed as 0.26%. I’m not completely sure, but I believe that this note is saying that the fund sometimes lends out its assets (as you might do for someone who is shorting stock), and the revenue generated by that activity might lower the expenses beyond the percentage listed. As a result, the expense number shown is a maximum.
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
add a comment |
When shares are borrowed for the purpose of shorting, a borrow is fee charged by the brokerage firm to a client who borrows the shares. If the broker does not have lendable shares in house, it will have to borrow the shares from another broker to effect this and the brokers will share the fee. Some brokers share a portion of this fee with the lender (owner) of the securities.
Further down the page in your link it says:
The Fund may also engage in short-term secured lending of its investments to certain eligible third parties. This is used as a means of generating additional income and to off-set the costs of the Fund.
Per the two links, if this ETF lends the shares, the Fund will receive 62.5% borrow fee, lowering operational costs.
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
sscarduzio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106528%2fetf-asterisk-clause-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The quote you are asking about is a footnote to the fund expenses/fees, which is listed as 0.26%. I’m not completely sure, but I believe that this note is saying that the fund sometimes lends out its assets (as you might do for someone who is shorting stock), and the revenue generated by that activity might lower the expenses beyond the percentage listed. As a result, the expense number shown is a maximum.
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
add a comment |
The quote you are asking about is a footnote to the fund expenses/fees, which is listed as 0.26%. I’m not completely sure, but I believe that this note is saying that the fund sometimes lends out its assets (as you might do for someone who is shorting stock), and the revenue generated by that activity might lower the expenses beyond the percentage listed. As a result, the expense number shown is a maximum.
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
add a comment |
The quote you are asking about is a footnote to the fund expenses/fees, which is listed as 0.26%. I’m not completely sure, but I believe that this note is saying that the fund sometimes lends out its assets (as you might do for someone who is shorting stock), and the revenue generated by that activity might lower the expenses beyond the percentage listed. As a result, the expense number shown is a maximum.
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
The quote you are asking about is a footnote to the fund expenses/fees, which is listed as 0.26%. I’m not completely sure, but I believe that this note is saying that the fund sometimes lends out its assets (as you might do for someone who is shorting stock), and the revenue generated by that activity might lower the expenses beyond the percentage listed. As a result, the expense number shown is a maximum.
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
answered 13 hours ago
Ben MillerBen Miller
80.5k20220288
80.5k20220288
add a comment |
add a comment |
When shares are borrowed for the purpose of shorting, a borrow is fee charged by the brokerage firm to a client who borrows the shares. If the broker does not have lendable shares in house, it will have to borrow the shares from another broker to effect this and the brokers will share the fee. Some brokers share a portion of this fee with the lender (owner) of the securities.
Further down the page in your link it says:
The Fund may also engage in short-term secured lending of its investments to certain eligible third parties. This is used as a means of generating additional income and to off-set the costs of the Fund.
Per the two links, if this ETF lends the shares, the Fund will receive 62.5% borrow fee, lowering operational costs.
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
add a comment |
When shares are borrowed for the purpose of shorting, a borrow is fee charged by the brokerage firm to a client who borrows the shares. If the broker does not have lendable shares in house, it will have to borrow the shares from another broker to effect this and the brokers will share the fee. Some brokers share a portion of this fee with the lender (owner) of the securities.
Further down the page in your link it says:
The Fund may also engage in short-term secured lending of its investments to certain eligible third parties. This is used as a means of generating additional income and to off-set the costs of the Fund.
Per the two links, if this ETF lends the shares, the Fund will receive 62.5% borrow fee, lowering operational costs.
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
add a comment |
When shares are borrowed for the purpose of shorting, a borrow is fee charged by the brokerage firm to a client who borrows the shares. If the broker does not have lendable shares in house, it will have to borrow the shares from another broker to effect this and the brokers will share the fee. Some brokers share a portion of this fee with the lender (owner) of the securities.
Further down the page in your link it says:
The Fund may also engage in short-term secured lending of its investments to certain eligible third parties. This is used as a means of generating additional income and to off-set the costs of the Fund.
Per the two links, if this ETF lends the shares, the Fund will receive 62.5% borrow fee, lowering operational costs.
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
When shares are borrowed for the purpose of shorting, a borrow is fee charged by the brokerage firm to a client who borrows the shares. If the broker does not have lendable shares in house, it will have to borrow the shares from another broker to effect this and the brokers will share the fee. Some brokers share a portion of this fee with the lender (owner) of the securities.
Further down the page in your link it says:
The Fund may also engage in short-term secured lending of its investments to certain eligible third parties. This is used as a means of generating additional income and to off-set the costs of the Fund.
Per the two links, if this ETF lends the shares, the Fund will receive 62.5% borrow fee, lowering operational costs.
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
answered 12 hours ago
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
17.7k12653
17.7k12653
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
Thank you for your explanation! However, isn't shorting done using derivative instruments (i.e. futures)? How comes these become part of an ETF portfolio? I thought ETFs would just make sure their portfolio mirrors the top N capitalised stocks in an index at all times. 🤔
– sscarduzio
10 hours ago
2
2
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
You can short using derivatives, but you can "just" short the old fashioned way. Sell stocks you don't have at today's price, in order to buy them back again (and complete the order) within the next 30 days. Used to be you could do this without any stock - a naked short - but this caused really big problems when a lot of people did it - and more stock was 'shorted' than actually existed. So now you have to borrow instead.
– Sobrique
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio - An ETF is a security that is comprised of equities, bonds, etc., depending on the nature of the ETF. In the US, it can be shorted as long as it is borrowable. I don't know UK regulatory rules. LOL. Notification with a @ in front of your handle changes the tone of things :->)
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@Sobrique - Is the requirement that you cover within 30 days a UK regulatory rule?
– Bob Baerker
10 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
@sscarduzio The ETF isn't the one shorting anything here. Somebody else wants to short something the ETF owns, and the ETF is getting paid for lending them the stock. For something like an ETF that expects to hold something long term, this is a fairly reasonable way to make extra money at the expense of liquidity.
– mbrig
8 hours ago
add a comment |
sscarduzio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sscarduzio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sscarduzio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sscarduzio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106528%2fetf-asterisk-clause-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
