Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for “negates”?Positive alternative to “ominous”A positive alternative to 'harp'What's the word for “too many but not good enough”?More fitting alternative for 'air-raid'What is the meaning of: “If we offend, it is with our good will”Is there a more positive alternative to the word “inevitability”?“within the context” of a workshop - synonymsNicer word for inquisitorA more positive word for “co-conspirator”?Isn't there a simple adverb for the opposite of 'loudly'?
Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?
I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?
In a multiple cat home, how many litter boxes should you have?
How to get directions in deep space?
Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?
Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram
Will the Sticky MAC access policy prevent unauthorized hubs from connecting to a network?
Does the reader need to like the PoV character?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
Boundary Value Problem and FullSimplify
What kind of floor tile is this?
What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?
Isometries between spherical space forms
What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?
JIS and ISO square taper
Is it ethical to recieve stipend after publishing enough papers?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?
How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?
Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?
Non-trope happy ending?
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week
Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?
How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?
Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for “negates”?
Positive alternative to “ominous”A positive alternative to 'harp'What's the word for “too many but not good enough”?More fitting alternative for 'air-raid'What is the meaning of: “If we offend, it is with our good will”Is there a more positive alternative to the word “inevitability”?“within the context” of a workshop - synonymsNicer word for inquisitorA more positive word for “co-conspirator”?Isn't there a simple adverb for the opposite of 'loudly'?
I have somewhere the following sentence:
our platform negates the need for a middleman ...
but I do not want to offend or upset the middlemen whomever it is ... there are many middlemen in the context I'm reffering to there.
The question is how can I replace "negate" that is too abrupt, radical and may upset people with something more reasonable?
Would "diminishes" be a good alternative? other suggestions?
single-word-requests meaning synonyms
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have somewhere the following sentence:
our platform negates the need for a middleman ...
but I do not want to offend or upset the middlemen whomever it is ... there are many middlemen in the context I'm reffering to there.
The question is how can I replace "negate" that is too abrupt, radical and may upset people with something more reasonable?
Would "diminishes" be a good alternative? other suggestions?
single-word-requests meaning synonyms
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
3
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago
add a comment |
I have somewhere the following sentence:
our platform negates the need for a middleman ...
but I do not want to offend or upset the middlemen whomever it is ... there are many middlemen in the context I'm reffering to there.
The question is how can I replace "negate" that is too abrupt, radical and may upset people with something more reasonable?
Would "diminishes" be a good alternative? other suggestions?
single-word-requests meaning synonyms
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have somewhere the following sentence:
our platform negates the need for a middleman ...
but I do not want to offend or upset the middlemen whomever it is ... there are many middlemen in the context I'm reffering to there.
The question is how can I replace "negate" that is too abrupt, radical and may upset people with something more reasonable?
Would "diminishes" be a good alternative? other suggestions?
single-word-requests meaning synonyms
single-word-requests meaning synonyms
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
asked 3 hours ago
SkyWalkerSkyWalker
1112
1112
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
SkyWalker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
3
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago
add a comment |
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
3
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
3
3
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
A (somewhat formal/technical) term used in such situations is obviate.
our platform obviates the need for a middleman ...
ODO:
obviate
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Remove (a need or difficulty)
‘the presence of roller blinds obviated the need for curtains’
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm in IT development, where our raison d'etre is to automate business processes which often put some people out of job. The standard approach we use to sell IT projects when we cannot outright eliminate the jobs is to empower them to do more value-added service to the business because with automation they have more time to do so.
I don't know your situation. If the middleman can be re-purposed you can say "our platform frees the middleman from administrative duties to empower them for ..."
EDIT: I didn't notice that Elliot already suggested the same thing.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'd say:
Our platform allows you to forgo the middleman.
(Positive language, as opposed to negative.)
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
add a comment |
For one, I'd say if the need is only diminished then the platform has does not do the whole job. You are only ending the Need for the middleman. You are not taking them away and chopping them up. There are surely better things for them to go and do.
For alternatives you could use "Removes" or "Eliminates" the need. If you hope to be very gentle you could "relieve" the need for the middleman but that would be an odd choice.
Or get around it by "replacing" the middleman or 'Doing the job of the middleman'. In any case you are selling a function or product. It's impact on individuals is not part of the design or construction of the item.
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
SkyWalker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490767%2fis-there-a-nicer-politer-more-positive-alternative-for-negates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A (somewhat formal/technical) term used in such situations is obviate.
our platform obviates the need for a middleman ...
ODO:
obviate
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Remove (a need or difficulty)
‘the presence of roller blinds obviated the need for curtains’
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A (somewhat formal/technical) term used in such situations is obviate.
our platform obviates the need for a middleman ...
ODO:
obviate
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Remove (a need or difficulty)
‘the presence of roller blinds obviated the need for curtains’
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A (somewhat formal/technical) term used in such situations is obviate.
our platform obviates the need for a middleman ...
ODO:
obviate
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Remove (a need or difficulty)
‘the presence of roller blinds obviated the need for curtains’
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
A (somewhat formal/technical) term used in such situations is obviate.
our platform obviates the need for a middleman ...
ODO:
obviate
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Remove (a need or difficulty)
‘the presence of roller blinds obviated the need for curtains’
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
answered 3 hours ago
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.4k63894
26.4k63894
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
'Obviates' is another way of saying 'by-passes,' using Latin roots.
– Hugh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm in IT development, where our raison d'etre is to automate business processes which often put some people out of job. The standard approach we use to sell IT projects when we cannot outright eliminate the jobs is to empower them to do more value-added service to the business because with automation they have more time to do so.
I don't know your situation. If the middleman can be re-purposed you can say "our platform frees the middleman from administrative duties to empower them for ..."
EDIT: I didn't notice that Elliot already suggested the same thing.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm in IT development, where our raison d'etre is to automate business processes which often put some people out of job. The standard approach we use to sell IT projects when we cannot outright eliminate the jobs is to empower them to do more value-added service to the business because with automation they have more time to do so.
I don't know your situation. If the middleman can be re-purposed you can say "our platform frees the middleman from administrative duties to empower them for ..."
EDIT: I didn't notice that Elliot already suggested the same thing.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm in IT development, where our raison d'etre is to automate business processes which often put some people out of job. The standard approach we use to sell IT projects when we cannot outright eliminate the jobs is to empower them to do more value-added service to the business because with automation they have more time to do so.
I don't know your situation. If the middleman can be re-purposed you can say "our platform frees the middleman from administrative duties to empower them for ..."
EDIT: I didn't notice that Elliot already suggested the same thing.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm in IT development, where our raison d'etre is to automate business processes which often put some people out of job. The standard approach we use to sell IT projects when we cannot outright eliminate the jobs is to empower them to do more value-added service to the business because with automation they have more time to do so.
I don't know your situation. If the middleman can be re-purposed you can say "our platform frees the middleman from administrative duties to empower them for ..."
EDIT: I didn't notice that Elliot already suggested the same thing.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
answered 1 hour ago
Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee
1264
1264
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Paul S. Lee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'd say:
Our platform allows you to forgo the middleman.
(Positive language, as opposed to negative.)
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
add a comment |
I'd say:
Our platform allows you to forgo the middleman.
(Positive language, as opposed to negative.)
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
add a comment |
I'd say:
Our platform allows you to forgo the middleman.
(Positive language, as opposed to negative.)
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'd say:
Our platform allows you to forgo the middleman.
(Positive language, as opposed to negative.)
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
answered 3 hours ago
ElGElG
111
111
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
ElG is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
add a comment |
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
Or even: Our platform allows you to go straight to the <source, end customer, whatever> or gives you direct access to, allows direct interaction with... don’t mention middlemen at all.
– Jim
30 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
I like this answer since "allows you" shifts the attention to the purchaser of the platform / end user.
– Paul S. Lee
14 mins ago
add a comment |
For one, I'd say if the need is only diminished then the platform has does not do the whole job. You are only ending the Need for the middleman. You are not taking them away and chopping them up. There are surely better things for them to go and do.
For alternatives you could use "Removes" or "Eliminates" the need. If you hope to be very gentle you could "relieve" the need for the middleman but that would be an odd choice.
Or get around it by "replacing" the middleman or 'Doing the job of the middleman'. In any case you are selling a function or product. It's impact on individuals is not part of the design or construction of the item.
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
add a comment |
For one, I'd say if the need is only diminished then the platform has does not do the whole job. You are only ending the Need for the middleman. You are not taking them away and chopping them up. There are surely better things for them to go and do.
For alternatives you could use "Removes" or "Eliminates" the need. If you hope to be very gentle you could "relieve" the need for the middleman but that would be an odd choice.
Or get around it by "replacing" the middleman or 'Doing the job of the middleman'. In any case you are selling a function or product. It's impact on individuals is not part of the design or construction of the item.
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
add a comment |
For one, I'd say if the need is only diminished then the platform has does not do the whole job. You are only ending the Need for the middleman. You are not taking them away and chopping them up. There are surely better things for them to go and do.
For alternatives you could use "Removes" or "Eliminates" the need. If you hope to be very gentle you could "relieve" the need for the middleman but that would be an odd choice.
Or get around it by "replacing" the middleman or 'Doing the job of the middleman'. In any case you are selling a function or product. It's impact on individuals is not part of the design or construction of the item.
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
For one, I'd say if the need is only diminished then the platform has does not do the whole job. You are only ending the Need for the middleman. You are not taking them away and chopping them up. There are surely better things for them to go and do.
For alternatives you could use "Removes" or "Eliminates" the need. If you hope to be very gentle you could "relieve" the need for the middleman but that would be an odd choice.
Or get around it by "replacing" the middleman or 'Doing the job of the middleman'. In any case you are selling a function or product. It's impact on individuals is not part of the design or construction of the item.
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
answered 3 hours ago
ElliotElliot
742
742
add a comment |
add a comment |
SkyWalker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SkyWalker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SkyWalker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SkyWalker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490767%2fis-there-a-nicer-politer-more-positive-alternative-for-negates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How about "offsets"?
– Hot Licks
3 hours ago
3
“Eliminates the middleman” is a common phrase, but i don’t see how that would make the middleman any happier.
– Damila
3 hours ago
If you're trying not to offend the middlemen that you're trying to eliminate, I suspect that it's not a matter of word choice (put away the thesaurus) but of phrasing. As Paul S. Lee notes below, you may need to avoid explicitly saying that you're getting rid of them, and instead put some positive spin on how you're saying it. That said, as @Damila said, "cutting out the middleman" is a very common expression, and you might get away with using it if your audience doesn't realize that you're using it completely literally.
– A C
39 secs ago