Tactics for judging if a printed image will be bright enough? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy do my photos look bad only when they are printed?How to choose the kind of paper for an inkjet print?How does software raise exposure in post-processing?Calibrating monitor (CRT) to match third vendor printerAnyone use a MacBook Pro to edit/print digital photos?Color spaces for large prints / and or webCanon printer not printting .tiff files at the correct sizeHow can I adjust white balance for many photos by the same amount in Lightroom?Frustration from printing in home inkjet printerChanging the brightness of a calibrated monitor for other uses?

Why is my new battery behaving weirdly?

INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

Tactics for judging if a printed image will be bright enough?

How a 64-bit process virtual address space is divided in Linux?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

is it ok to reduce charging current for li ion 18650 battery?

Why does the flight controls check come before arming the autobrake on the A320?

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

Break Away Valves for Launch

Rotate a column

Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Why do remote US companies require working in the US?

Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

How do I align (1) and (2)?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

Need help understanding a power circuit (caps and diodes)

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin



Tactics for judging if a printed image will be bright enough?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy do my photos look bad only when they are printed?How to choose the kind of paper for an inkjet print?How does software raise exposure in post-processing?Calibrating monitor (CRT) to match third vendor printerAnyone use a MacBook Pro to edit/print digital photos?Color spaces for large prints / and or webCanon printer not printting .tiff files at the correct sizeHow can I adjust white balance for many photos by the same amount in Lightroom?Frustration from printing in home inkjet printerChanging the brightness of a calibrated monitor for other uses?










4















I'm struggling a bit with how to judge if a photo will be bright enough when printed, while I'm working on it on my monitor. "Bright enough" of course changes with the ambient or targeted lighting where it will be displayed, this, that and the other thing, yes, but I'd like to set that aside as much as possible here.



I do not print at home; I send my pictures to labs (e.g., Whitewall).



My monitor is calibrated and characterized. The candela is currently at 120 cd/m2. That's too bright... at least, well, let me explain.



Of course, one of the things I've tried is to lower my screen brightness quite low, 80 cd/m2, maybe even less. That helps, but comes at the price of reducing colors and contrast--at least my perception of them. Also, the 120 cd/m2 mark has the advantage of being bright enough for normal computer use with the window shade up.



Another thing I try to do is consider the histogram. If the image has a nice bell shaped histogram, I try to make sure that the majority of it is to the right. This tactic helps, but only if the image lends itself to it. When the photo's histogram is all over the place, I have a harder time using it for decision making.



I've also noticed recently that setting the image window (the window where the photo appears in Photoshop and co.) to a white background totally changes how you see the picture: doing so instantly makes me want to crank up the brightness and often the saturation too. However, I have not yet tried this tactic for printing, and fear over-correcting the other way.



My goal of course is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures; I'd like to be able to know that the photo will give a good print right off the bat.



So, my first question would be, has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?



And more largely, those of you who manage to "get brightness right the first time", how do you do it? What's your trick?



Thanks in advance for your ideas and advice and I hope that others will find the info helpful as well.










share|improve this question


























    4















    I'm struggling a bit with how to judge if a photo will be bright enough when printed, while I'm working on it on my monitor. "Bright enough" of course changes with the ambient or targeted lighting where it will be displayed, this, that and the other thing, yes, but I'd like to set that aside as much as possible here.



    I do not print at home; I send my pictures to labs (e.g., Whitewall).



    My monitor is calibrated and characterized. The candela is currently at 120 cd/m2. That's too bright... at least, well, let me explain.



    Of course, one of the things I've tried is to lower my screen brightness quite low, 80 cd/m2, maybe even less. That helps, but comes at the price of reducing colors and contrast--at least my perception of them. Also, the 120 cd/m2 mark has the advantage of being bright enough for normal computer use with the window shade up.



    Another thing I try to do is consider the histogram. If the image has a nice bell shaped histogram, I try to make sure that the majority of it is to the right. This tactic helps, but only if the image lends itself to it. When the photo's histogram is all over the place, I have a harder time using it for decision making.



    I've also noticed recently that setting the image window (the window where the photo appears in Photoshop and co.) to a white background totally changes how you see the picture: doing so instantly makes me want to crank up the brightness and often the saturation too. However, I have not yet tried this tactic for printing, and fear over-correcting the other way.



    My goal of course is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures; I'd like to be able to know that the photo will give a good print right off the bat.



    So, my first question would be, has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?



    And more largely, those of you who manage to "get brightness right the first time", how do you do it? What's your trick?



    Thanks in advance for your ideas and advice and I hope that others will find the info helpful as well.










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      I'm struggling a bit with how to judge if a photo will be bright enough when printed, while I'm working on it on my monitor. "Bright enough" of course changes with the ambient or targeted lighting where it will be displayed, this, that and the other thing, yes, but I'd like to set that aside as much as possible here.



      I do not print at home; I send my pictures to labs (e.g., Whitewall).



      My monitor is calibrated and characterized. The candela is currently at 120 cd/m2. That's too bright... at least, well, let me explain.



      Of course, one of the things I've tried is to lower my screen brightness quite low, 80 cd/m2, maybe even less. That helps, but comes at the price of reducing colors and contrast--at least my perception of them. Also, the 120 cd/m2 mark has the advantage of being bright enough for normal computer use with the window shade up.



      Another thing I try to do is consider the histogram. If the image has a nice bell shaped histogram, I try to make sure that the majority of it is to the right. This tactic helps, but only if the image lends itself to it. When the photo's histogram is all over the place, I have a harder time using it for decision making.



      I've also noticed recently that setting the image window (the window where the photo appears in Photoshop and co.) to a white background totally changes how you see the picture: doing so instantly makes me want to crank up the brightness and often the saturation too. However, I have not yet tried this tactic for printing, and fear over-correcting the other way.



      My goal of course is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures; I'd like to be able to know that the photo will give a good print right off the bat.



      So, my first question would be, has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?



      And more largely, those of you who manage to "get brightness right the first time", how do you do it? What's your trick?



      Thanks in advance for your ideas and advice and I hope that others will find the info helpful as well.










      share|improve this question














      I'm struggling a bit with how to judge if a photo will be bright enough when printed, while I'm working on it on my monitor. "Bright enough" of course changes with the ambient or targeted lighting where it will be displayed, this, that and the other thing, yes, but I'd like to set that aside as much as possible here.



      I do not print at home; I send my pictures to labs (e.g., Whitewall).



      My monitor is calibrated and characterized. The candela is currently at 120 cd/m2. That's too bright... at least, well, let me explain.



      Of course, one of the things I've tried is to lower my screen brightness quite low, 80 cd/m2, maybe even less. That helps, but comes at the price of reducing colors and contrast--at least my perception of them. Also, the 120 cd/m2 mark has the advantage of being bright enough for normal computer use with the window shade up.



      Another thing I try to do is consider the histogram. If the image has a nice bell shaped histogram, I try to make sure that the majority of it is to the right. This tactic helps, but only if the image lends itself to it. When the photo's histogram is all over the place, I have a harder time using it for decision making.



      I've also noticed recently that setting the image window (the window where the photo appears in Photoshop and co.) to a white background totally changes how you see the picture: doing so instantly makes me want to crank up the brightness and often the saturation too. However, I have not yet tried this tactic for printing, and fear over-correcting the other way.



      My goal of course is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures; I'd like to be able to know that the photo will give a good print right off the bat.



      So, my first question would be, has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?



      And more largely, those of you who manage to "get brightness right the first time", how do you do it? What's your trick?



      Thanks in advance for your ideas and advice and I hope that others will find the info helpful as well.







      post-processing printing brightness






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      KLE-FranceKLE-France

      363




      363




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2















          Has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?




          No. That is a bad idea.



          You need to see the relationship between the elements of your image, not the relationship with the surroundings, which you can not control.



          That line of reasoning is the same as put some reflectors behind your monitor, or put the monitor in front of the sunniest of the windows in your home.





          My goal, of course, is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures




          Ok. Do not order a zillion test images. Just send some. But you need to. You are assuming the provider has their equipment also calibrated.



          1. Send for example a good black and white portrait (or whatever theme you are working with)


          2. Define what is the middle tone of that image, for example, the cheek. Depending on your profiles, let's assume it is 128,128,128.



          3. Make some variations of your image and put some watermark indicating the adjustment, for example, a gamma adjustment of increments of 0.1. Your original image would be Gamma 1.



            • Gamma 1.1, Gamma 1.2...


            • Gamma 0.9, Gamma 0.8...



          4. You can make a gradient of some clear steps, for example, 5 steps from Black to white, or make them 10 or whatever. And make similar variations.


          5. You can do that also with a color image. With a portrait, or with different color gradients.



          Then you can decide which variation you can apply methodically to the images you send to that specific provider.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "61"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106278%2ftactics-for-judging-if-a-printed-image-will-be-bright-enough%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2















            Has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?




            No. That is a bad idea.



            You need to see the relationship between the elements of your image, not the relationship with the surroundings, which you can not control.



            That line of reasoning is the same as put some reflectors behind your monitor, or put the monitor in front of the sunniest of the windows in your home.





            My goal, of course, is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures




            Ok. Do not order a zillion test images. Just send some. But you need to. You are assuming the provider has their equipment also calibrated.



            1. Send for example a good black and white portrait (or whatever theme you are working with)


            2. Define what is the middle tone of that image, for example, the cheek. Depending on your profiles, let's assume it is 128,128,128.



            3. Make some variations of your image and put some watermark indicating the adjustment, for example, a gamma adjustment of increments of 0.1. Your original image would be Gamma 1.



              • Gamma 1.1, Gamma 1.2...


              • Gamma 0.9, Gamma 0.8...



            4. You can make a gradient of some clear steps, for example, 5 steps from Black to white, or make them 10 or whatever. And make similar variations.


            5. You can do that also with a color image. With a portrait, or with different color gradients.



            Then you can decide which variation you can apply methodically to the images you send to that specific provider.






            share|improve this answer





























              2















              Has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?




              No. That is a bad idea.



              You need to see the relationship between the elements of your image, not the relationship with the surroundings, which you can not control.



              That line of reasoning is the same as put some reflectors behind your monitor, or put the monitor in front of the sunniest of the windows in your home.





              My goal, of course, is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures




              Ok. Do not order a zillion test images. Just send some. But you need to. You are assuming the provider has their equipment also calibrated.



              1. Send for example a good black and white portrait (or whatever theme you are working with)


              2. Define what is the middle tone of that image, for example, the cheek. Depending on your profiles, let's assume it is 128,128,128.



              3. Make some variations of your image and put some watermark indicating the adjustment, for example, a gamma adjustment of increments of 0.1. Your original image would be Gamma 1.



                • Gamma 1.1, Gamma 1.2...


                • Gamma 0.9, Gamma 0.8...



              4. You can make a gradient of some clear steps, for example, 5 steps from Black to white, or make them 10 or whatever. And make similar variations.


              5. You can do that also with a color image. With a portrait, or with different color gradients.



              Then you can decide which variation you can apply methodically to the images you send to that specific provider.






              share|improve this answer



























                2












                2








                2








                Has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?




                No. That is a bad idea.



                You need to see the relationship between the elements of your image, not the relationship with the surroundings, which you can not control.



                That line of reasoning is the same as put some reflectors behind your monitor, or put the monitor in front of the sunniest of the windows in your home.





                My goal, of course, is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures




                Ok. Do not order a zillion test images. Just send some. But you need to. You are assuming the provider has their equipment also calibrated.



                1. Send for example a good black and white portrait (or whatever theme you are working with)


                2. Define what is the middle tone of that image, for example, the cheek. Depending on your profiles, let's assume it is 128,128,128.



                3. Make some variations of your image and put some watermark indicating the adjustment, for example, a gamma adjustment of increments of 0.1. Your original image would be Gamma 1.



                  • Gamma 1.1, Gamma 1.2...


                  • Gamma 0.9, Gamma 0.8...



                4. You can make a gradient of some clear steps, for example, 5 steps from Black to white, or make them 10 or whatever. And make similar variations.


                5. You can do that also with a color image. With a portrait, or with different color gradients.



                Then you can decide which variation you can apply methodically to the images you send to that specific provider.






                share|improve this answer
















                Has anyone else found that using a white background in their photo editing software is a good way to judge the brightness of the print to come?




                No. That is a bad idea.



                You need to see the relationship between the elements of your image, not the relationship with the surroundings, which you can not control.



                That line of reasoning is the same as put some reflectors behind your monitor, or put the monitor in front of the sunniest of the windows in your home.





                My goal, of course, is to stop ordering a gazillion test pictures




                Ok. Do not order a zillion test images. Just send some. But you need to. You are assuming the provider has their equipment also calibrated.



                1. Send for example a good black and white portrait (or whatever theme you are working with)


                2. Define what is the middle tone of that image, for example, the cheek. Depending on your profiles, let's assume it is 128,128,128.



                3. Make some variations of your image and put some watermark indicating the adjustment, for example, a gamma adjustment of increments of 0.1. Your original image would be Gamma 1.



                  • Gamma 1.1, Gamma 1.2...


                  • Gamma 0.9, Gamma 0.8...



                4. You can make a gradient of some clear steps, for example, 5 steps from Black to white, or make them 10 or whatever. And make similar variations.


                5. You can do that also with a color image. With a portrait, or with different color gradients.



                Then you can decide which variation you can apply methodically to the images you send to that specific provider.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago

























                answered 3 hours ago









                RafaelRafael

                14.2k12244




                14.2k12244



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106278%2ftactics-for-judging-if-a-printed-image-will-be-bright-enough%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

                    Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

                    inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX