Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix (2)Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixProblem with Eigenvectors when given a matrix containing approximate numbers and symbolsIs Eigensystem::eivin message a bug?Seemingly wrong eigenvectors for numerical matrix whose elements differ in scale by orders of magnitudeInverse of a 3x3 MatrixConvert, using the Pauli matrices, an $n times m$ matrix of quaternions into a $2 n times 2 m$ matrix with complex entries, and vice versaEigenvalues and eigenvectors of tensorsNo eigenvectors coming for a very simple* matrixUnable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixBasis for unstable manifold of a matrixDensity map for complex and imaginary parts of eigenvalues on one graph

What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?

Is it good practice to use Linear Least-Squares with SMA?

Meme-controlled people

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?

This word with a lot of past tenses

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Describing a chess game in a novel

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

Is "upgrade" the right word to use in this context?

Aluminum electrolytic or ceramic capacitors for linear regulator input and output?

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

What is the purpose or proof behind chain rule?

Why does energy conservation give me the wrong answer in this inelastic collision problem?

Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?



Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix (2)


Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixProblem with Eigenvectors when given a matrix containing approximate numbers and symbolsIs Eigensystem::eivin message a bug?Seemingly wrong eigenvectors for numerical matrix whose elements differ in scale by orders of magnitudeInverse of a 3x3 MatrixConvert, using the Pauli matrices, an $n times m$ matrix of quaternions into a $2 n times 2 m$ matrix with complex entries, and vice versaEigenvalues and eigenvectors of tensorsNo eigenvectors coming for a very simple* matrixUnable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixBasis for unstable manifold of a matrixDensity map for complex and imaginary parts of eigenvalues on one graph













2












$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?







matrix eigenvalues






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









corey979

20.9k64282




20.9k64282










asked 4 hours ago









kowalskikowalski

1559




1559











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
@corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
$endgroup$
– kowalski
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
$endgroup$
– kowalski
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193391%2funable-to-evaluate-eigenvalues-and-eigenvectors-for-a-matrix-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

56.7k577157




56.7k577157











  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
$endgroup$
– kowalski
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
$endgroup$
– kowalski
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193391%2funable-to-evaluate-eigenvalues-and-eigenvectors-for-a-matrix-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX