Crthuky

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

How to pronounce the slash sign

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Type int? vs type int

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Large drywall patch supports

How to draw lines on a tikz-cd diagram

What does "I’d sit this one out, Cap," imply or mean in the context?

Why are there no referendums in the US?

Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts

Go Pregnant or Go Home

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Opposite of a diet

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string

What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?

Is this version of a gravity generator feasible?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Gears on left are inverse to gears on right?

How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?

Closest Prime Number

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

Nautlius: add mouse right-click action to compute MD5 sum

Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive

Help finding the use of the subjunctiveMemento quod <subjunctive>Does using quippe in a relative clause require conjunctive?What is the optative?Can a subjunctive verb ever be modified by οὐ? (Greek)“..so that others may live”, future subjunctive?Passive Subjunctive Translated as ActiveWhich adverbs of possibility and probability warrant the subjunctive?When to use cum + subjunctive and when cum + indicativeReflexive Pronouns & Indirect StatementsAccusative in genitive relative clause with verb finiebat

2

This is probably a pretty basic question, but I am new to Latin and am having trouble understanding the subjunctive.

The sentence "Pūgnāverō ut nautam superem" is translated to "I shall have fought in order that I may overcome the sailor" (according to my textbook). I understand that pūgnāverō is active, indicative, future perfect, first person, singular, which so far I would have believed to be translated as "I will have fought (already)." I am confused because my book uses the word "shall," which to me signals that it is subjunctive.

My questions are:

• Am I misunderstanding the way "shall" is used?


• Is this something that only occurs in clauses of purpose, i.e., is this occurring because "superem" is subjunctive?

There is a similar post here, but I feel it does not answer my question.

coniunctivus purpose-clause

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

2

This is probably a pretty basic question, but I am new to Latin and am having trouble understanding the subjunctive.

The sentence "Pūgnāverō ut nautam superem" is translated to "I shall have fought in order that I may overcome the sailor" (according to my textbook). I understand that pūgnāverō is active, indicative, future perfect, first person, singular, which so far I would have believed to be translated as "I will have fought (already)." I am confused because my book uses the word "shall," which to me signals that it is subjunctive.

My questions are:

• Am I misunderstanding the way "shall" is used?


• Is this something that only occurs in clauses of purpose, i.e., is this occurring because "superem" is subjunctive?

There is a similar post here, but I feel it does not answer my question.

coniunctivus purpose-clause

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

This is probably a pretty basic question, but I am new to Latin and am having trouble understanding the subjunctive.

The sentence "Pūgnāverō ut nautam superem" is translated to "I shall have fought in order that I may overcome the sailor" (according to my textbook). I understand that pūgnāverō is active, indicative, future perfect, first person, singular, which so far I would have believed to be translated as "I will have fought (already)." I am confused because my book uses the word "shall," which to me signals that it is subjunctive.

My questions are:

• Am I misunderstanding the way "shall" is used?


• Is this something that only occurs in clauses of purpose, i.e., is this occurring because "superem" is subjunctive?

There is a similar post here, but I feel it does not answer my question.

coniunctivus purpose-clause

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

New contributor

Kevin Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 hours ago

Kevin MillerKevin Miller

1284

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

You're misunderstanding 'shall.' The traditional convention ('rule') in English is that 'shall' is used with first person subjects (I/we) to form the future and future perfect tenses, whereas 'will' is used for second person (you) and third person (he/she/it/they).* Your textbook is clearly following this convention. The fact that there's also a purpose clause in the sentence has nothing to do with it.

* (Except in emphatic utterances, where the future expresses strong determination to do something; in such cases, 'will' is traditionally used for the first person, 'shall' for the second and third persons.)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I had no idea this was a normal convention. Thanks!
  
  – Kevin Miller
  57 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

The future-perfect is a primary tense for something that has still to be completed; "already" would refer to the past. This is a purpose/ final clause therefore, after ut, the present subjunctive is deployed--superem.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Kevin Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');

var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);

;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);

);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9359%2fsequence-of-tenses-translating-the-subjunctive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

You're misunderstanding 'shall.' The traditional convention ('rule') in English is that 'shall' is used with first person subjects (I/we) to form the future and future perfect tenses, whereas 'will' is used for second person (you) and third person (he/she/it/they).* Your textbook is clearly following this convention. The fact that there's also a purpose clause in the sentence has nothing to do with it.

* (Except in emphatic utterances, where the future expresses strong determination to do something; in such cases, 'will' is traditionally used for the first person, 'shall' for the second and third persons.)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I had no idea this was a normal convention. Thanks!
  
  – Kevin Miller
  57 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

You're misunderstanding 'shall.' The traditional convention ('rule') in English is that 'shall' is used with first person subjects (I/we) to form the future and future perfect tenses, whereas 'will' is used for second person (you) and third person (he/she/it/they).* Your textbook is clearly following this convention. The fact that there's also a purpose clause in the sentence has nothing to do with it.

* (Except in emphatic utterances, where the future expresses strong determination to do something; in such cases, 'will' is traditionally used for the first person, 'shall' for the second and third persons.)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I had no idea this was a normal convention. Thanks!
  
  – Kevin Miller
  57 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

You're misunderstanding 'shall.' The traditional convention ('rule') in English is that 'shall' is used with first person subjects (I/we) to form the future and future perfect tenses, whereas 'will' is used for second person (you) and third person (he/she/it/they).* Your textbook is clearly following this convention. The fact that there's also a purpose clause in the sentence has nothing to do with it.

* (Except in emphatic utterances, where the future expresses strong determination to do something; in such cases, 'will' is traditionally used for the first person, 'shall' for the second and third persons.)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

answered 2 hours ago

cnreadcnread

8,90711124

2

The future-perfect is a primary tense for something that has still to be completed; "already" would refer to the past. This is a purpose/ final clause therefore, after ut, the present subjunctive is deployed--superem.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

add a comment | 

2

The future-perfect is a primary tense for something that has still to be completed; "already" would refer to the past. This is a purpose/ final clause therefore, after ut, the present subjunctive is deployed--superem.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

add a comment | 

The future-perfect is a primary tense for something that has still to be completed; "already" would refer to the past. This is a purpose/ final clause therefore, after ut, the present subjunctive is deployed--superem.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715

answered 1 hour ago

tonytony

67715