Closed-form expression for certain productcomplex contour integral calculation after Möbius transformationQuestion about a particular estimate in Riemannian geometry$pi e$ and an unfamiliar polynomialIs there a closed form of $int_0^frac12dfractextarcsinh^nxx^mdx$?Proof of an identity involving $int exp(-|x-s|)dx$ over an even sphereAnother integral that has a closed form involving finite series of $zeta(2k+1)$'s. Could it be reflexive?A nested integral sequenceDifficult trigonometric integralSolving or bounding the real part of the integral $int_0^2 pi i m frace^-tt-a dt$Reference for calculating definite integral involving sines
Closed-form expression for certain product
complex contour integral calculation after Möbius transformationQuestion about a particular estimate in Riemannian geometry$pi e$ and an unfamiliar polynomialIs there a closed form of $int_0^frac12dfractextarcsinh^nxx^mdx$?Proof of an identity involving $int exp(-|x-s|)dx$ over an even sphereAnother integral that has a closed form involving finite series of $zeta(2k+1)$'s. Could it be reflexive?A nested integral sequenceDifficult trigonometric integralSolving or bounding the real part of the integral $int_0^2 pi i m frace^-tt-a dt$Reference for calculating definite integral involving sines
$begingroup$
$mathrm G$ is Catalan's constant.
I recently found the product
$$
alpha=prod_n=1^inftyfracE_n(frac12)E_n(frac712)E_n(frac120)E_n(frac1320)E_n(frac14)E_n(frac112)E_n(frac320)E_n(frac1120)=\
expleft[frac47mathrm G30pi+frac34right]sqrtfrac3391pisqrtfrac2pifracsqrt[5]11sqrt[3]7sqrt[5]frac3^313^3$$
Where $$E_n(x)=fracj(n+x)(en)^2xj(n-x)qquad xin(0,1)$$
and $j(x)=x^x$.
Could I have some numerical evidence, or better yet an alternate proof? My tools are limited to desmos, which cannot really handle infinite products. Thanks.
My Proof.
We define $$mathrm L(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(sin t)dt$$
And we use $$sin t=tprod_ngeq1left(1-fract^2pi^2 n^2right)$$
To see that $$log(sin t)=log(t)+sum_ngeq1logfracpi^2n^2-t^2pi^2n^2$$
Then integrate both sides over $[0,x]$ to get
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=x(log x-1)+sum_ngeq1xlogbigg(1-fracx^2pi^2n^2bigg)-2x+pi nlogfracpi n+xpi n-x$$
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=logleft[fracj(x)e^xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+x)(epi n)^2xj(pi n-x)right]$$
$xmapsto pi x$:
$$pimathrm L(x)=logleft[fracj(pi x)e^pi xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+pi x)(epi n)^2pi xj(pi n-pi x)right]$$
$$mathrm L(x)=logleft[left(fracpieright)^xj(x)right]+sum_ngeq1log E_n(x)$$
Then we define $$U(x)=prod_ngeq1E_n(x)$$
To see that $$U(x)=left(fracepi xright)^xexpmathrm L(x)$$
Where we used $$sum_nlog(a_n)=logleft[prod_na_nright]$$
and the neat rules $$log(a^b)=log(e^blog a)=blog a$$
$$log(a)pm b=logleft(e^pm baright)$$
to simplify the expressions. Next, we define
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,a_2,dots,a_mu;b_1,b_2,dots,b_nu)=fracprod_i=1^mu U(a_i)prod_i=1^nu U(b_i)$$
And we see that
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,dots,a_mu;b_1,dots,b_nu)=prod_ngeq1fracprod_i=1^mu E_n(a_i)prod_i=1^nu E_n(b_i)$$
This gives $$P_1,1(x_1;x_2)=left(fracepiright)^x_1-x_2fracj(x_2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm L(x_1)-mathrm L(x_2)right]$$
Then we define $$mathrmT(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(tan t)dt=mathrm L(x)-mathrm L(x+1/2)-frac12log2$$
To get that
$$P_1,1left(x;x+frac12right)=sqrtfrac2pie,fracj(x+1/2)j(x)expmathrm T(x)$$
So we have
$$P_2,2left(x_1,x_2+frac12 ;x_2,x_1+frac12right)=fracj(x_1+1/2)j(x_2)j(x_2+1/2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm T(x_1)-mathrm T(x_2)right]$$
Then using the identities
$$mathrm L(1/2)=-frac12log2$$
$$mathrm L(1/4)=fracmathrm G2pi-frac14log2$$
We get $$P_1,1left(frac12;frac14right)=frac1(2pi)^1/4expleft[fracmathrm G2pi+frac14right]tag1$$
From here, the identity
$$-mathrm T(1/12)=frac2mathrm G3pi$$
which gives
$$P_1,1left(frac712;frac112right)=sqrtfrac67pisqrt[6]7expleft[frac2mathrm G3pi+frac12right]tag2$$
Then from here, the identity
$$mathrm T(1/20)-mathrm T(3/20)=frac2mathrm G5pi$$
gives $$P_2,2left(frac120,frac1320;frac320,frac1120right)=left(fracj(11)j(3)j(13)right)^1/20expfrac2mathrm G5pitag3$$
Then multiplying $(1),(2),$ and $(3)$, we have the desired result, namely
$$P_4,4left(frac12,frac712,frac120,frac1320;frac14,frac112,frac320,frac1120right)=alpha$$
integration alternative-proof products
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathrm G$ is Catalan's constant.
I recently found the product
$$
alpha=prod_n=1^inftyfracE_n(frac12)E_n(frac712)E_n(frac120)E_n(frac1320)E_n(frac14)E_n(frac112)E_n(frac320)E_n(frac1120)=\
expleft[frac47mathrm G30pi+frac34right]sqrtfrac3391pisqrtfrac2pifracsqrt[5]11sqrt[3]7sqrt[5]frac3^313^3$$
Where $$E_n(x)=fracj(n+x)(en)^2xj(n-x)qquad xin(0,1)$$
and $j(x)=x^x$.
Could I have some numerical evidence, or better yet an alternate proof? My tools are limited to desmos, which cannot really handle infinite products. Thanks.
My Proof.
We define $$mathrm L(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(sin t)dt$$
And we use $$sin t=tprod_ngeq1left(1-fract^2pi^2 n^2right)$$
To see that $$log(sin t)=log(t)+sum_ngeq1logfracpi^2n^2-t^2pi^2n^2$$
Then integrate both sides over $[0,x]$ to get
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=x(log x-1)+sum_ngeq1xlogbigg(1-fracx^2pi^2n^2bigg)-2x+pi nlogfracpi n+xpi n-x$$
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=logleft[fracj(x)e^xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+x)(epi n)^2xj(pi n-x)right]$$
$xmapsto pi x$:
$$pimathrm L(x)=logleft[fracj(pi x)e^pi xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+pi x)(epi n)^2pi xj(pi n-pi x)right]$$
$$mathrm L(x)=logleft[left(fracpieright)^xj(x)right]+sum_ngeq1log E_n(x)$$
Then we define $$U(x)=prod_ngeq1E_n(x)$$
To see that $$U(x)=left(fracepi xright)^xexpmathrm L(x)$$
Where we used $$sum_nlog(a_n)=logleft[prod_na_nright]$$
and the neat rules $$log(a^b)=log(e^blog a)=blog a$$
$$log(a)pm b=logleft(e^pm baright)$$
to simplify the expressions. Next, we define
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,a_2,dots,a_mu;b_1,b_2,dots,b_nu)=fracprod_i=1^mu U(a_i)prod_i=1^nu U(b_i)$$
And we see that
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,dots,a_mu;b_1,dots,b_nu)=prod_ngeq1fracprod_i=1^mu E_n(a_i)prod_i=1^nu E_n(b_i)$$
This gives $$P_1,1(x_1;x_2)=left(fracepiright)^x_1-x_2fracj(x_2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm L(x_1)-mathrm L(x_2)right]$$
Then we define $$mathrmT(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(tan t)dt=mathrm L(x)-mathrm L(x+1/2)-frac12log2$$
To get that
$$P_1,1left(x;x+frac12right)=sqrtfrac2pie,fracj(x+1/2)j(x)expmathrm T(x)$$
So we have
$$P_2,2left(x_1,x_2+frac12 ;x_2,x_1+frac12right)=fracj(x_1+1/2)j(x_2)j(x_2+1/2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm T(x_1)-mathrm T(x_2)right]$$
Then using the identities
$$mathrm L(1/2)=-frac12log2$$
$$mathrm L(1/4)=fracmathrm G2pi-frac14log2$$
We get $$P_1,1left(frac12;frac14right)=frac1(2pi)^1/4expleft[fracmathrm G2pi+frac14right]tag1$$
From here, the identity
$$-mathrm T(1/12)=frac2mathrm G3pi$$
which gives
$$P_1,1left(frac712;frac112right)=sqrtfrac67pisqrt[6]7expleft[frac2mathrm G3pi+frac12right]tag2$$
Then from here, the identity
$$mathrm T(1/20)-mathrm T(3/20)=frac2mathrm G5pi$$
gives $$P_2,2left(frac120,frac1320;frac320,frac1120right)=left(fracj(11)j(3)j(13)right)^1/20expfrac2mathrm G5pitag3$$
Then multiplying $(1),(2),$ and $(3)$, we have the desired result, namely
$$P_4,4left(frac12,frac712,frac120,frac1320;frac14,frac112,frac320,frac1120right)=alpha$$
integration alternative-proof products
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathrm G$ is Catalan's constant.
I recently found the product
$$
alpha=prod_n=1^inftyfracE_n(frac12)E_n(frac712)E_n(frac120)E_n(frac1320)E_n(frac14)E_n(frac112)E_n(frac320)E_n(frac1120)=\
expleft[frac47mathrm G30pi+frac34right]sqrtfrac3391pisqrtfrac2pifracsqrt[5]11sqrt[3]7sqrt[5]frac3^313^3$$
Where $$E_n(x)=fracj(n+x)(en)^2xj(n-x)qquad xin(0,1)$$
and $j(x)=x^x$.
Could I have some numerical evidence, or better yet an alternate proof? My tools are limited to desmos, which cannot really handle infinite products. Thanks.
My Proof.
We define $$mathrm L(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(sin t)dt$$
And we use $$sin t=tprod_ngeq1left(1-fract^2pi^2 n^2right)$$
To see that $$log(sin t)=log(t)+sum_ngeq1logfracpi^2n^2-t^2pi^2n^2$$
Then integrate both sides over $[0,x]$ to get
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=x(log x-1)+sum_ngeq1xlogbigg(1-fracx^2pi^2n^2bigg)-2x+pi nlogfracpi n+xpi n-x$$
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=logleft[fracj(x)e^xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+x)(epi n)^2xj(pi n-x)right]$$
$xmapsto pi x$:
$$pimathrm L(x)=logleft[fracj(pi x)e^pi xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+pi x)(epi n)^2pi xj(pi n-pi x)right]$$
$$mathrm L(x)=logleft[left(fracpieright)^xj(x)right]+sum_ngeq1log E_n(x)$$
Then we define $$U(x)=prod_ngeq1E_n(x)$$
To see that $$U(x)=left(fracepi xright)^xexpmathrm L(x)$$
Where we used $$sum_nlog(a_n)=logleft[prod_na_nright]$$
and the neat rules $$log(a^b)=log(e^blog a)=blog a$$
$$log(a)pm b=logleft(e^pm baright)$$
to simplify the expressions. Next, we define
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,a_2,dots,a_mu;b_1,b_2,dots,b_nu)=fracprod_i=1^mu U(a_i)prod_i=1^nu U(b_i)$$
And we see that
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,dots,a_mu;b_1,dots,b_nu)=prod_ngeq1fracprod_i=1^mu E_n(a_i)prod_i=1^nu E_n(b_i)$$
This gives $$P_1,1(x_1;x_2)=left(fracepiright)^x_1-x_2fracj(x_2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm L(x_1)-mathrm L(x_2)right]$$
Then we define $$mathrmT(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(tan t)dt=mathrm L(x)-mathrm L(x+1/2)-frac12log2$$
To get that
$$P_1,1left(x;x+frac12right)=sqrtfrac2pie,fracj(x+1/2)j(x)expmathrm T(x)$$
So we have
$$P_2,2left(x_1,x_2+frac12 ;x_2,x_1+frac12right)=fracj(x_1+1/2)j(x_2)j(x_2+1/2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm T(x_1)-mathrm T(x_2)right]$$
Then using the identities
$$mathrm L(1/2)=-frac12log2$$
$$mathrm L(1/4)=fracmathrm G2pi-frac14log2$$
We get $$P_1,1left(frac12;frac14right)=frac1(2pi)^1/4expleft[fracmathrm G2pi+frac14right]tag1$$
From here, the identity
$$-mathrm T(1/12)=frac2mathrm G3pi$$
which gives
$$P_1,1left(frac712;frac112right)=sqrtfrac67pisqrt[6]7expleft[frac2mathrm G3pi+frac12right]tag2$$
Then from here, the identity
$$mathrm T(1/20)-mathrm T(3/20)=frac2mathrm G5pi$$
gives $$P_2,2left(frac120,frac1320;frac320,frac1120right)=left(fracj(11)j(3)j(13)right)^1/20expfrac2mathrm G5pitag3$$
Then multiplying $(1),(2),$ and $(3)$, we have the desired result, namely
$$P_4,4left(frac12,frac712,frac120,frac1320;frac14,frac112,frac320,frac1120right)=alpha$$
integration alternative-proof products
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$mathrm G$ is Catalan's constant.
I recently found the product
$$
alpha=prod_n=1^inftyfracE_n(frac12)E_n(frac712)E_n(frac120)E_n(frac1320)E_n(frac14)E_n(frac112)E_n(frac320)E_n(frac1120)=\
expleft[frac47mathrm G30pi+frac34right]sqrtfrac3391pisqrtfrac2pifracsqrt[5]11sqrt[3]7sqrt[5]frac3^313^3$$
Where $$E_n(x)=fracj(n+x)(en)^2xj(n-x)qquad xin(0,1)$$
and $j(x)=x^x$.
Could I have some numerical evidence, or better yet an alternate proof? My tools are limited to desmos, which cannot really handle infinite products. Thanks.
My Proof.
We define $$mathrm L(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(sin t)dt$$
And we use $$sin t=tprod_ngeq1left(1-fract^2pi^2 n^2right)$$
To see that $$log(sin t)=log(t)+sum_ngeq1logfracpi^2n^2-t^2pi^2n^2$$
Then integrate both sides over $[0,x]$ to get
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=x(log x-1)+sum_ngeq1xlogbigg(1-fracx^2pi^2n^2bigg)-2x+pi nlogfracpi n+xpi n-x$$
$$pimathrm L(x/pi)=logleft[fracj(x)e^xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+x)(epi n)^2xj(pi n-x)right]$$
$xmapsto pi x$:
$$pimathrm L(x)=logleft[fracj(pi x)e^pi xright]+sum_ngeq1logleft[fracj(pi n+pi x)(epi n)^2pi xj(pi n-pi x)right]$$
$$mathrm L(x)=logleft[left(fracpieright)^xj(x)right]+sum_ngeq1log E_n(x)$$
Then we define $$U(x)=prod_ngeq1E_n(x)$$
To see that $$U(x)=left(fracepi xright)^xexpmathrm L(x)$$
Where we used $$sum_nlog(a_n)=logleft[prod_na_nright]$$
and the neat rules $$log(a^b)=log(e^blog a)=blog a$$
$$log(a)pm b=logleft(e^pm baright)$$
to simplify the expressions. Next, we define
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,a_2,dots,a_mu;b_1,b_2,dots,b_nu)=fracprod_i=1^mu U(a_i)prod_i=1^nu U(b_i)$$
And we see that
$$P_mu,nu(a_1,dots,a_mu;b_1,dots,b_nu)=prod_ngeq1fracprod_i=1^mu E_n(a_i)prod_i=1^nu E_n(b_i)$$
This gives $$P_1,1(x_1;x_2)=left(fracepiright)^x_1-x_2fracj(x_2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm L(x_1)-mathrm L(x_2)right]$$
Then we define $$mathrmT(x)=frac1piint_0^pi xlog(tan t)dt=mathrm L(x)-mathrm L(x+1/2)-frac12log2$$
To get that
$$P_1,1left(x;x+frac12right)=sqrtfrac2pie,fracj(x+1/2)j(x)expmathrm T(x)$$
So we have
$$P_2,2left(x_1,x_2+frac12 ;x_2,x_1+frac12right)=fracj(x_1+1/2)j(x_2)j(x_2+1/2)j(x_1)expleft[mathrm T(x_1)-mathrm T(x_2)right]$$
Then using the identities
$$mathrm L(1/2)=-frac12log2$$
$$mathrm L(1/4)=fracmathrm G2pi-frac14log2$$
We get $$P_1,1left(frac12;frac14right)=frac1(2pi)^1/4expleft[fracmathrm G2pi+frac14right]tag1$$
From here, the identity
$$-mathrm T(1/12)=frac2mathrm G3pi$$
which gives
$$P_1,1left(frac712;frac112right)=sqrtfrac67pisqrt[6]7expleft[frac2mathrm G3pi+frac12right]tag2$$
Then from here, the identity
$$mathrm T(1/20)-mathrm T(3/20)=frac2mathrm G5pi$$
gives $$P_2,2left(frac120,frac1320;frac320,frac1120right)=left(fracj(11)j(3)j(13)right)^1/20expfrac2mathrm G5pitag3$$
Then multiplying $(1),(2),$ and $(3)$, we have the desired result, namely
$$P_4,4left(frac12,frac712,frac120,frac1320;frac14,frac112,frac320,frac1120right)=alpha$$
integration alternative-proof products
integration alternative-proof products
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
clathratus
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
clathratusclathratus
1135
1135
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
clathratus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
the OP asks for some numerical evidence: plotted below is the constant $alpha$ minus the $prod_n=1^N$ of the expression in OP, as a function of $N$; so at least within 1 part in 1000 the infinite product does seem to converge from above to the stated constant.

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following Mathematica code
NProduct[(1/2 + n)^(1/2 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/2)/(n - 1/2)^(n -
1/2)*(7/12 + n)^(7/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*7/12)/(n - 7/12)^(n -
7/12)*(1/20 + n)^(1/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/20)/(n - 1/20)^(n -
1/20)*(13/20 + n)^(13/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*13/20)/(n -13/20)^(n -13/20)/
((1/4 + n)^(1/4 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/4)/(n -
1/4)^(n - 1/4))/((1/12 + n)^(1/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*
n)^(2*1/12)/(n - 1/12)^(n - 1/12))/((11/20 + n)^(11/20 +
n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*11/20)/(n - 11/20)^(n - 11/20))/((3/20 +
n)^(3/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*3/20)/(n - 3/20)^(n - 3/20)),
n,1,Infinity, AccuracyGoal -> 3, WorkingPrecision -> 15]
performs
$0.78046 $
If somebody verifies the above code, it would be kind of her/him.
Addition. The Maple command for the product up to $100$
Digits:=15:evalf(product((1/2+n)^(1/2+n)*(7/12+n)^(7/12+n)*(1/20+n)^(1/20+n)*(13/20+n)^(13/20+n)*(n-1/4)^(n-1/4)*(n-1/12)^(n-1/12)*(n-11/20)^(n-11/20)*(n-3/20)^(n-3/20)/(exp(1)*n*(n-1/2)^(n-1/2)*sqrt(exp(1)*n)*(n-7/12)^(n-7/12)*(n-1/20)^(n-1/20)*(n-13/20)^(n-13/20)*(1/4+n)^(1/4+n)*(1/12+n)^(1/12+n)*(11/20+n)^(11/20+n)*(3/20+n)^(3/20+n)), n = 1 .. 100));
produces $0.781527175985084 $.
Also
N[Exp[47*Catalan/30/Pi + 3/4]* Sqrt[33/91/Pi*Sqrt[2/Pi*11^(1/5)/7^(1/3)*3^(3/5)/13^(3/5)]], 15]
$0.780459197412937 $
Edit. A typo in the codes ($(n-1/2)^n-1/2$ instead of $(n-1/2)^n-1$) is corrected. That typo leads to incorrect results.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
clathratus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326156%2fclosed-form-expression-for-certain-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
the OP asks for some numerical evidence: plotted below is the constant $alpha$ minus the $prod_n=1^N$ of the expression in OP, as a function of $N$; so at least within 1 part in 1000 the infinite product does seem to converge from above to the stated constant.

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
the OP asks for some numerical evidence: plotted below is the constant $alpha$ minus the $prod_n=1^N$ of the expression in OP, as a function of $N$; so at least within 1 part in 1000 the infinite product does seem to converge from above to the stated constant.

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
the OP asks for some numerical evidence: plotted below is the constant $alpha$ minus the $prod_n=1^N$ of the expression in OP, as a function of $N$; so at least within 1 part in 1000 the infinite product does seem to converge from above to the stated constant.

$endgroup$
the OP asks for some numerical evidence: plotted below is the constant $alpha$ minus the $prod_n=1^N$ of the expression in OP, as a function of $N$; so at least within 1 part in 1000 the infinite product does seem to converge from above to the stated constant.

edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Carlo BeenakkerCarlo Beenakker
78.7k9186289
78.7k9186289
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is perfect, thank you. What software did you use to plot this?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The downvote is mine.
$endgroup$
– user64494
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
$begingroup$
oh, this is just Mathematica output.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
32 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following Mathematica code
NProduct[(1/2 + n)^(1/2 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/2)/(n - 1/2)^(n -
1/2)*(7/12 + n)^(7/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*7/12)/(n - 7/12)^(n -
7/12)*(1/20 + n)^(1/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/20)/(n - 1/20)^(n -
1/20)*(13/20 + n)^(13/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*13/20)/(n -13/20)^(n -13/20)/
((1/4 + n)^(1/4 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/4)/(n -
1/4)^(n - 1/4))/((1/12 + n)^(1/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*
n)^(2*1/12)/(n - 1/12)^(n - 1/12))/((11/20 + n)^(11/20 +
n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*11/20)/(n - 11/20)^(n - 11/20))/((3/20 +
n)^(3/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*3/20)/(n - 3/20)^(n - 3/20)),
n,1,Infinity, AccuracyGoal -> 3, WorkingPrecision -> 15]
performs
$0.78046 $
If somebody verifies the above code, it would be kind of her/him.
Addition. The Maple command for the product up to $100$
Digits:=15:evalf(product((1/2+n)^(1/2+n)*(7/12+n)^(7/12+n)*(1/20+n)^(1/20+n)*(13/20+n)^(13/20+n)*(n-1/4)^(n-1/4)*(n-1/12)^(n-1/12)*(n-11/20)^(n-11/20)*(n-3/20)^(n-3/20)/(exp(1)*n*(n-1/2)^(n-1/2)*sqrt(exp(1)*n)*(n-7/12)^(n-7/12)*(n-1/20)^(n-1/20)*(n-13/20)^(n-13/20)*(1/4+n)^(1/4+n)*(1/12+n)^(1/12+n)*(11/20+n)^(11/20+n)*(3/20+n)^(3/20+n)), n = 1 .. 100));
produces $0.781527175985084 $.
Also
N[Exp[47*Catalan/30/Pi + 3/4]* Sqrt[33/91/Pi*Sqrt[2/Pi*11^(1/5)/7^(1/3)*3^(3/5)/13^(3/5)]], 15]
$0.780459197412937 $
Edit. A typo in the codes ($(n-1/2)^n-1/2$ instead of $(n-1/2)^n-1$) is corrected. That typo leads to incorrect results.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following Mathematica code
NProduct[(1/2 + n)^(1/2 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/2)/(n - 1/2)^(n -
1/2)*(7/12 + n)^(7/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*7/12)/(n - 7/12)^(n -
7/12)*(1/20 + n)^(1/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/20)/(n - 1/20)^(n -
1/20)*(13/20 + n)^(13/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*13/20)/(n -13/20)^(n -13/20)/
((1/4 + n)^(1/4 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/4)/(n -
1/4)^(n - 1/4))/((1/12 + n)^(1/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*
n)^(2*1/12)/(n - 1/12)^(n - 1/12))/((11/20 + n)^(11/20 +
n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*11/20)/(n - 11/20)^(n - 11/20))/((3/20 +
n)^(3/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*3/20)/(n - 3/20)^(n - 3/20)),
n,1,Infinity, AccuracyGoal -> 3, WorkingPrecision -> 15]
performs
$0.78046 $
If somebody verifies the above code, it would be kind of her/him.
Addition. The Maple command for the product up to $100$
Digits:=15:evalf(product((1/2+n)^(1/2+n)*(7/12+n)^(7/12+n)*(1/20+n)^(1/20+n)*(13/20+n)^(13/20+n)*(n-1/4)^(n-1/4)*(n-1/12)^(n-1/12)*(n-11/20)^(n-11/20)*(n-3/20)^(n-3/20)/(exp(1)*n*(n-1/2)^(n-1/2)*sqrt(exp(1)*n)*(n-7/12)^(n-7/12)*(n-1/20)^(n-1/20)*(n-13/20)^(n-13/20)*(1/4+n)^(1/4+n)*(1/12+n)^(1/12+n)*(11/20+n)^(11/20+n)*(3/20+n)^(3/20+n)), n = 1 .. 100));
produces $0.781527175985084 $.
Also
N[Exp[47*Catalan/30/Pi + 3/4]* Sqrt[33/91/Pi*Sqrt[2/Pi*11^(1/5)/7^(1/3)*3^(3/5)/13^(3/5)]], 15]
$0.780459197412937 $
Edit. A typo in the codes ($(n-1/2)^n-1/2$ instead of $(n-1/2)^n-1$) is corrected. That typo leads to incorrect results.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following Mathematica code
NProduct[(1/2 + n)^(1/2 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/2)/(n - 1/2)^(n -
1/2)*(7/12 + n)^(7/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*7/12)/(n - 7/12)^(n -
7/12)*(1/20 + n)^(1/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/20)/(n - 1/20)^(n -
1/20)*(13/20 + n)^(13/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*13/20)/(n -13/20)^(n -13/20)/
((1/4 + n)^(1/4 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/4)/(n -
1/4)^(n - 1/4))/((1/12 + n)^(1/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*
n)^(2*1/12)/(n - 1/12)^(n - 1/12))/((11/20 + n)^(11/20 +
n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*11/20)/(n - 11/20)^(n - 11/20))/((3/20 +
n)^(3/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*3/20)/(n - 3/20)^(n - 3/20)),
n,1,Infinity, AccuracyGoal -> 3, WorkingPrecision -> 15]
performs
$0.78046 $
If somebody verifies the above code, it would be kind of her/him.
Addition. The Maple command for the product up to $100$
Digits:=15:evalf(product((1/2+n)^(1/2+n)*(7/12+n)^(7/12+n)*(1/20+n)^(1/20+n)*(13/20+n)^(13/20+n)*(n-1/4)^(n-1/4)*(n-1/12)^(n-1/12)*(n-11/20)^(n-11/20)*(n-3/20)^(n-3/20)/(exp(1)*n*(n-1/2)^(n-1/2)*sqrt(exp(1)*n)*(n-7/12)^(n-7/12)*(n-1/20)^(n-1/20)*(n-13/20)^(n-13/20)*(1/4+n)^(1/4+n)*(1/12+n)^(1/12+n)*(11/20+n)^(11/20+n)*(3/20+n)^(3/20+n)), n = 1 .. 100));
produces $0.781527175985084 $.
Also
N[Exp[47*Catalan/30/Pi + 3/4]* Sqrt[33/91/Pi*Sqrt[2/Pi*11^(1/5)/7^(1/3)*3^(3/5)/13^(3/5)]], 15]
$0.780459197412937 $
Edit. A typo in the codes ($(n-1/2)^n-1/2$ instead of $(n-1/2)^n-1$) is corrected. That typo leads to incorrect results.
$endgroup$
The following Mathematica code
NProduct[(1/2 + n)^(1/2 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/2)/(n - 1/2)^(n -
1/2)*(7/12 + n)^(7/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*7/12)/(n - 7/12)^(n -
7/12)*(1/20 + n)^(1/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/20)/(n - 1/20)^(n -
1/20)*(13/20 + n)^(13/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*13/20)/(n -13/20)^(n -13/20)/
((1/4 + n)^(1/4 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*1/4)/(n -
1/4)^(n - 1/4))/((1/12 + n)^(1/12 + n)/(Exp[1]*
n)^(2*1/12)/(n - 1/12)^(n - 1/12))/((11/20 + n)^(11/20 +
n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*11/20)/(n - 11/20)^(n - 11/20))/((3/20 +
n)^(3/20 + n)/(Exp[1]*n)^(2*3/20)/(n - 3/20)^(n - 3/20)),
n,1,Infinity, AccuracyGoal -> 3, WorkingPrecision -> 15]
performs
$0.78046 $
If somebody verifies the above code, it would be kind of her/him.
Addition. The Maple command for the product up to $100$
Digits:=15:evalf(product((1/2+n)^(1/2+n)*(7/12+n)^(7/12+n)*(1/20+n)^(1/20+n)*(13/20+n)^(13/20+n)*(n-1/4)^(n-1/4)*(n-1/12)^(n-1/12)*(n-11/20)^(n-11/20)*(n-3/20)^(n-3/20)/(exp(1)*n*(n-1/2)^(n-1/2)*sqrt(exp(1)*n)*(n-7/12)^(n-7/12)*(n-1/20)^(n-1/20)*(n-13/20)^(n-13/20)*(1/4+n)^(1/4+n)*(1/12+n)^(1/12+n)*(11/20+n)^(11/20+n)*(3/20+n)^(3/20+n)), n = 1 .. 100));
produces $0.781527175985084 $.
Also
N[Exp[47*Catalan/30/Pi + 3/4]* Sqrt[33/91/Pi*Sqrt[2/Pi*11^(1/5)/7^(1/3)*3^(3/5)/13^(3/5)]], 15]
$0.780459197412937 $
Edit. A typo in the codes ($(n-1/2)^n-1/2$ instead of $(n-1/2)^n-1$) is corrected. That typo leads to incorrect results.
edited 58 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
user64494user64494
1,721517
1,721517
add a comment |
add a comment |
clathratus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clathratus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clathratus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clathratus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326156%2fclosed-form-expression-for-certain-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown