How thick does lunar regolith ever get? Has the thickness been measured and mapped by satellite?Constant lunar sub-surface temperatureCouldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust?Cubesats in lunar orbit and beyond - how does communication work?How hard is the Lunar surface?How did the Apollo Moon rocks get away from NASA and into the public?What is the purpose of the satellite that China is putting in lunar orbit?How bright would electrostatically suspended dust above the lunar surface be? Has it ever been measured?Why does NASA use Nitrogen storage for lunar regolith?How does the ISS Transit Finder website get the position of the ISS so accurately?How will the Lunar Gateway go to L2 and L1; how much delta-v is needed?How often does a geostationary satellite enter into a Lunar shadow?Is Lunar Horizon Glow still a thing? Has the “dust settled” on the topic?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

How thick does lunar regolith ever get? Has the thickness been measured and mapped by satellite?

Stopping power of mountain vs road bike

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end

Check if button is pressed in QGIS 3 module

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Changing second column in csv conditionally

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Why do I get an error when I try to begin an equation?

General Advice on choosing Mathematics as career path

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Filter any system log file by date or date range

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Reorder a Master List Based on a Reordered Subset

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

How can I tell someone that I want to be his or her friend?



How thick does lunar regolith ever get? Has the thickness been measured and mapped by satellite?


Constant lunar sub-surface temperatureCouldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust?Cubesats in lunar orbit and beyond - how does communication work?How hard is the Lunar surface?How did the Apollo Moon rocks get away from NASA and into the public?What is the purpose of the satellite that China is putting in lunar orbit?How bright would electrostatically suspended dust above the lunar surface be? Has it ever been measured?Why does NASA use Nitrogen storage for lunar regolith?How does the ISS Transit Finder website get the position of the ISS so accurately?How will the Lunar Gateway go to L2 and L1; how much delta-v is needed?How often does a geostationary satellite enter into a Lunar shadow?Is Lunar Horizon Glow still a thing? Has the “dust settled” on the topic?













2












$begingroup$


Discussion in comments below the question Couldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust? have lead me to wonder if



  1. thickness of the lunar regolith is fairly well mapped by some combination of high temporal resolution radar and thermal inertia measurements by satellite.

  2. If so, how thick does it get?

My feeling is that it never gets more than say 20 cm and is usually a lot thinner, but I have no idea.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago















2












$begingroup$


Discussion in comments below the question Couldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust? have lead me to wonder if



  1. thickness of the lunar regolith is fairly well mapped by some combination of high temporal resolution radar and thermal inertia measurements by satellite.

  2. If so, how thick does it get?

My feeling is that it never gets more than say 20 cm and is usually a lot thinner, but I have no idea.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Discussion in comments below the question Couldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust? have lead me to wonder if



  1. thickness of the lunar regolith is fairly well mapped by some combination of high temporal resolution radar and thermal inertia measurements by satellite.

  2. If so, how thick does it get?

My feeling is that it never gets more than say 20 cm and is usually a lot thinner, but I have no idea.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Discussion in comments below the question Couldn't we just clear away the Moon Dust? have lead me to wonder if



  1. thickness of the lunar regolith is fairly well mapped by some combination of high temporal resolution radar and thermal inertia measurements by satellite.

  2. If so, how thick does it get?

My feeling is that it never gets more than say 20 cm and is usually a lot thinner, but I have no idea.







the-moon regolith






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









uhohuhoh

40.1k18149506




40.1k18149506







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago







1




1




$begingroup$
My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
$endgroup$
– Christoph
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
My first google came up with: "The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces." - Source: curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/letss/regolith.pdf
$endgroup$
– Christoph
2 hours ago













$begingroup$
@Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@Christoph It would be excellent if you considered posting an answer drawing upon that presentation! There is a lot of information about the various methods used to deduce density versus depth, as well as the mechanisms that can continue to produce small particles beyond the meteor impacts we've all heard about. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@Christoph I recognize some of those plots as plots in this answer.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

First, we have to define 'regolith'. NASA uses the term for all unconsolidated debris, including large boulders:




The lunar surface is covered by a layer of unconsolidated debris called the lunar regolith (fig. 53). The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces.




Lumps smaller than 1 cm are called "lunar soil".



The stuff you're probably after is the fraction fine enough to be called "dust".




Lunar dust generally connotes even finer materials than lunar soil. There is no official definition of what size fraction constitutes "dust"; some place the cutoff at less than 50 μm in diameter, while others at less than 10 μm.




All of these categories are mixed together, with smaller particles filling the space between larger particles.



At the surface, you tend to get a layer of dust.




Since the Moon lacks any sort of an atmosphere, the upper few millimeters of the regolith is exposed to the bombardment of micrometeorites and to solar wind irradiation. The extensive bombardment by micrometeorites, which continues today, breaks up soil particles and melts portions of the soil.




Lunar dust builds up at a rate of 1 mm/1000 y. Impacts can break up rock, but can also consolidate particles by melting:




The impact of micrometeoroids, sometimes travelling faster than 96,000 km/h (60,000 mph), generates enough heat to melt or partially vaporize dust particles. This melting and refreezing welds particles together into glassy, jagged-edged agglutinates,[12] reminiscent of tektites found on Earth.




We have some data on regolith depth, but it's incomplete. The best data is the samples taken by the Apollo missions, but those are very localized. Whole-surface data relies mostly on photos and various estimation techniques.



enter image description here



This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map made by Chang'e 3's rover Yutu.



Radar measurements from Earth can give an indication of surface grain size:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    "This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    37 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    35 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith is approximately 1.35 $g/cm^3$ for the top 30 cm, and it is approximately 1.85 $g/cm^3$ at a depth of 60 cm. It is as thin as 5 cm at some places.
It can cause lung cancer if ingested, and is similar to asbestos.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35312%2fhow-thick-does-lunar-regolith-ever-get-has-the-thickness-been-measured-and-mapp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

First, we have to define 'regolith'. NASA uses the term for all unconsolidated debris, including large boulders:




The lunar surface is covered by a layer of unconsolidated debris called the lunar regolith (fig. 53). The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces.




Lumps smaller than 1 cm are called "lunar soil".



The stuff you're probably after is the fraction fine enough to be called "dust".




Lunar dust generally connotes even finer materials than lunar soil. There is no official definition of what size fraction constitutes "dust"; some place the cutoff at less than 50 μm in diameter, while others at less than 10 μm.




All of these categories are mixed together, with smaller particles filling the space between larger particles.



At the surface, you tend to get a layer of dust.




Since the Moon lacks any sort of an atmosphere, the upper few millimeters of the regolith is exposed to the bombardment of micrometeorites and to solar wind irradiation. The extensive bombardment by micrometeorites, which continues today, breaks up soil particles and melts portions of the soil.




Lunar dust builds up at a rate of 1 mm/1000 y. Impacts can break up rock, but can also consolidate particles by melting:




The impact of micrometeoroids, sometimes travelling faster than 96,000 km/h (60,000 mph), generates enough heat to melt or partially vaporize dust particles. This melting and refreezing welds particles together into glassy, jagged-edged agglutinates,[12] reminiscent of tektites found on Earth.




We have some data on regolith depth, but it's incomplete. The best data is the samples taken by the Apollo missions, but those are very localized. Whole-surface data relies mostly on photos and various estimation techniques.



enter image description here



This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map made by Chang'e 3's rover Yutu.



Radar measurements from Earth can give an indication of surface grain size:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    "This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    37 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    35 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago















3












$begingroup$

First, we have to define 'regolith'. NASA uses the term for all unconsolidated debris, including large boulders:




The lunar surface is covered by a layer of unconsolidated debris called the lunar regolith (fig. 53). The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces.




Lumps smaller than 1 cm are called "lunar soil".



The stuff you're probably after is the fraction fine enough to be called "dust".




Lunar dust generally connotes even finer materials than lunar soil. There is no official definition of what size fraction constitutes "dust"; some place the cutoff at less than 50 μm in diameter, while others at less than 10 μm.




All of these categories are mixed together, with smaller particles filling the space between larger particles.



At the surface, you tend to get a layer of dust.




Since the Moon lacks any sort of an atmosphere, the upper few millimeters of the regolith is exposed to the bombardment of micrometeorites and to solar wind irradiation. The extensive bombardment by micrometeorites, which continues today, breaks up soil particles and melts portions of the soil.




Lunar dust builds up at a rate of 1 mm/1000 y. Impacts can break up rock, but can also consolidate particles by melting:




The impact of micrometeoroids, sometimes travelling faster than 96,000 km/h (60,000 mph), generates enough heat to melt or partially vaporize dust particles. This melting and refreezing welds particles together into glassy, jagged-edged agglutinates,[12] reminiscent of tektites found on Earth.




We have some data on regolith depth, but it's incomplete. The best data is the samples taken by the Apollo missions, but those are very localized. Whole-surface data relies mostly on photos and various estimation techniques.



enter image description here



This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map made by Chang'e 3's rover Yutu.



Radar measurements from Earth can give an indication of surface grain size:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    "This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    37 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    35 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

First, we have to define 'regolith'. NASA uses the term for all unconsolidated debris, including large boulders:




The lunar surface is covered by a layer of unconsolidated debris called the lunar regolith (fig. 53). The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces.




Lumps smaller than 1 cm are called "lunar soil".



The stuff you're probably after is the fraction fine enough to be called "dust".




Lunar dust generally connotes even finer materials than lunar soil. There is no official definition of what size fraction constitutes "dust"; some place the cutoff at less than 50 μm in diameter, while others at less than 10 μm.




All of these categories are mixed together, with smaller particles filling the space between larger particles.



At the surface, you tend to get a layer of dust.




Since the Moon lacks any sort of an atmosphere, the upper few millimeters of the regolith is exposed to the bombardment of micrometeorites and to solar wind irradiation. The extensive bombardment by micrometeorites, which continues today, breaks up soil particles and melts portions of the soil.




Lunar dust builds up at a rate of 1 mm/1000 y. Impacts can break up rock, but can also consolidate particles by melting:




The impact of micrometeoroids, sometimes travelling faster than 96,000 km/h (60,000 mph), generates enough heat to melt or partially vaporize dust particles. This melting and refreezing welds particles together into glassy, jagged-edged agglutinates,[12] reminiscent of tektites found on Earth.




We have some data on regolith depth, but it's incomplete. The best data is the samples taken by the Apollo missions, but those are very localized. Whole-surface data relies mostly on photos and various estimation techniques.



enter image description here



This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map made by Chang'e 3's rover Yutu.



Radar measurements from Earth can give an indication of surface grain size:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First, we have to define 'regolith'. NASA uses the term for all unconsolidated debris, including large boulders:




The lunar surface is covered by a layer of unconsolidated debris called the lunar regolith (fig. 53). The thickness of the regolith varies from about 5 m on mare surfaces to about 10 m on highland surfaces.




Lumps smaller than 1 cm are called "lunar soil".



The stuff you're probably after is the fraction fine enough to be called "dust".




Lunar dust generally connotes even finer materials than lunar soil. There is no official definition of what size fraction constitutes "dust"; some place the cutoff at less than 50 μm in diameter, while others at less than 10 μm.




All of these categories are mixed together, with smaller particles filling the space between larger particles.



At the surface, you tend to get a layer of dust.




Since the Moon lacks any sort of an atmosphere, the upper few millimeters of the regolith is exposed to the bombardment of micrometeorites and to solar wind irradiation. The extensive bombardment by micrometeorites, which continues today, breaks up soil particles and melts portions of the soil.




Lunar dust builds up at a rate of 1 mm/1000 y. Impacts can break up rock, but can also consolidate particles by melting:




The impact of micrometeoroids, sometimes travelling faster than 96,000 km/h (60,000 mph), generates enough heat to melt or partially vaporize dust particles. This melting and refreezing welds particles together into glassy, jagged-edged agglutinates,[12] reminiscent of tektites found on Earth.




We have some data on regolith depth, but it's incomplete. The best data is the samples taken by the Apollo missions, but those are very localized. Whole-surface data relies mostly on photos and various estimation techniques.



enter image description here



This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map made by Chang'e 3's rover Yutu.



Radar measurements from Earth can give an indication of surface grain size:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 35 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









HobbesHobbes

95.6k2272426




95.6k2272426







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    "This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    37 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    35 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    "This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    37 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    35 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
This is interesting! I had assumed the Moon's surface was binary; solid rock with ~10cm of power on top. Perhaps an occasional random boulder here and there. I didn't realize there was thought to be such a gradual transition over such an extended range of depths! I'm also surprised that existing surface-penetrating radar data is only from Earth, and not from any spacecraft orbiting the Moon!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
"This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
37 mins ago





$begingroup$
"This is a Ground Penetrating Radar map from Yutu" What's Yutu?
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
37 mins ago





1




1




$begingroup$
The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
35 mins ago




$begingroup$
The rover part of the Chinese Chang'e 3 lunar lander mission
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
35 mins ago












$begingroup$
Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
30 mins ago




$begingroup$
Only Yutu, or Yutu-2 too?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
30 mins ago











1












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith is approximately 1.35 $g/cm^3$ for the top 30 cm, and it is approximately 1.85 $g/cm^3$ at a depth of 60 cm. It is as thin as 5 cm at some places.
It can cause lung cancer if ingested, and is similar to asbestos.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith is approximately 1.35 $g/cm^3$ for the top 30 cm, and it is approximately 1.85 $g/cm^3$ at a depth of 60 cm. It is as thin as 5 cm at some places.
It can cause lung cancer if ingested, and is similar to asbestos.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Lunar regolith is approximately 1.35 $g/cm^3$ for the top 30 cm, and it is approximately 1.85 $g/cm^3$ at a depth of 60 cm. It is as thin as 5 cm at some places.
It can cause lung cancer if ingested, and is similar to asbestos.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



Lunar regolith is approximately 1.35 $g/cm^3$ for the top 30 cm, and it is approximately 1.85 $g/cm^3$ at a depth of 60 cm. It is as thin as 5 cm at some places.
It can cause lung cancer if ingested, and is similar to asbestos.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 22 mins ago









Uwe

11.5k23157




11.5k23157






New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 hours ago









MatthewMatthew

111




111




New contributor




Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hi @Matthew and Welcome to Space! When writing answers in Stack Exchange it's important to include links or citations to the sources of information that you quote. It' helps to verify the accuracy and makes your answer more informative to future readers.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35312%2fhow-thick-does-lunar-regolith-ever-get-has-the-thickness-been-measured-and-mapp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

Tender dossier with centered articlesHow can I get legal style indentation on section, subsection, subsubsec.. using titlesec?missing item with addtocontents before sectionsubsubsubsection, paragraph and subparagraph count not reset when starting a new section, subsection, etcTikZ won't support HSB color model hsb in article document classAdding a vskip1em before each section - won't compile with itHow to implement a customized hierarchical table of content using titletoc with changing number formatsSection title formatGrouped entries in index don't spill over to next columnParagraph spacing in documentclassarticle with Figure and ListingsRagged Right Index Entries

inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX