What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?Will the Earth ever stop rotating?Hypothetically, what would happen to the earth if a large hole was drilled through the center?What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?When will the Final Ice Age happen?Would life on Earth survive without the Sun?What would the equilibrium temperature be at the poles in a world without seasonality?What would happen if Earth suddenly stopped rotating and revolving at the same time?Will the Earth's core cool?Does the Earth 'Flare' like the Sun does?Where on Earth is the most windless lake with its own sea breeze?

Is a naturally all "male" species possible?

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Superhero words!

Bob has never been a M before

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?

What was required to accept "troll"?

Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Lifted its hind leg on or lifted its hind leg towards?

How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?

Are Warlocks Arcane or Divine?

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold

Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

Stereotypical names

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?



What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?


What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?Will the Earth ever stop rotating?Hypothetically, what would happen to the earth if a large hole was drilled through the center?What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?When will the Final Ice Age happen?Would life on Earth survive without the Sun?What would the equilibrium temperature be at the poles in a world without seasonality?What would happen if Earth suddenly stopped rotating and revolving at the same time?Will the Earth's core cool?Does the Earth 'Flare' like the Sun does?Where on Earth is the most windless lake with its own sea breeze?













2












$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    35 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    35 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.







geophysics hypothetical






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









sidharth chhabrasidharth chhabra

1534




1534











  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    35 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    35 mins ago















$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
35 mins ago




$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
35 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large fracTT_0=left(fracLL_0right)^frac14$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "553"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large fracTT_0=left(fracLL_0right)^frac14$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large fracTT_0=left(fracLL_0right)^frac14$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large fracTT_0=left(fracLL_0right)^frac14$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large fracTT_0=left(fracLL_0right)^frac14$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









Camilo RadaCamilo Rada

13.5k54396




13.5k54396











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago













$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Earth Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX