Sort with assumptionsvariable sized lists and using lists as variablesRetaining and reusing a one-to-one mapping from a sortSorting a matrix alphanumericallyRearranging a ListHow can I check if one expression implies another?Generating an Array of VectorsImporting, sorting and exporting listsDeleting Lonely Numbers From a ListApplying multiple functions to a single column in a tableFind positions in which list elements are equal

What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?

Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?

What's the meaning of "what it means for something to be something"?

If the Dominion rule using their Jem'Hadar troops, why is their life expectancy so low?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do

Control width of columns in a tabular environment

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

Taking the numerator and the denominator

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

What 1968 Moog synthesizer was used in the Movie Apollo 11?

How to get directions in deep space?

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

In the event of Brexit being postponed beyond the EU elections, will UK voters in EU countries be eligible to participate?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

Could a welfare state co-exist with mega corporations?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks



Sort with assumptions


variable sized lists and using lists as variablesRetaining and reusing a one-to-one mapping from a sortSorting a matrix alphanumericallyRearranging a ListHow can I check if one expression implies another?Generating an Array of VectorsImporting, sorting and exporting listsDeleting Lonely Numbers From a ListApplying multiple functions to a single column in a tableFind positions in which list elements are equal













5












$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    33 mins ago















5












$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    33 mins ago













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.







list-manipulation symbolic array sorting






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 55 mins ago









leastactionleastaction

23229




23229







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    33 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    33 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
$endgroup$
– mikado
33 mins ago




$begingroup$
An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
$endgroup$
– mikado
33 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here is a possibility:



sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
Sort[list, order]
]


For your example:



sortWithAssumptions[
0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
] //TeXForm



$left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




Another example:



sortWithAssumptions[
0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
] //TeXForm



$left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, Carl!
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    27 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$

How about:



list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



-Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    33 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
    $endgroup$
    – Kuba
    32 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    29 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Kuba
    26 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

(* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



    Assuming[
    Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
    FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
    (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


    This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193600%2fsort-with-assumptions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        27 mins ago















      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        27 mins ago













      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$








      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 29 mins ago









      Carl WollCarl Woll

      70.8k394184




      70.8k394184











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        27 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        27 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      Thank you, Carl!
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      27 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Thank you, Carl!
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      27 mins ago











      4












      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        33 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        29 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        26 mins ago















      4












      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        33 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        29 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        26 mins ago













      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 37 mins ago









      KubaKuba

      106k12209530




      106k12209530











      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        33 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        29 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        26 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        33 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        29 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        26 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      33 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      33 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      32 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      32 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      29 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      29 mins ago




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      26 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      26 mins ago











      3












      $begingroup$

      Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

      (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

        (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

          (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

          (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 29 mins ago









          MarcoBMarcoB

          37.6k556113




          37.6k556113





















              3












              $begingroup$

              In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



              Assuming[
              Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
              FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
              (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


              This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                Assuming[
                Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                  Assuming[
                  Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                  FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                  (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                  This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                  Assuming[
                  Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                  FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                  (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                  This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 21 mins ago

























                  answered 28 mins ago









                  mikadomikado

                  6,7071929




                  6,7071929



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193600%2fsort-with-assumptions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      acmart: Multiple authors: all with same affiliation, one author an additional affiliationHow to Write Names of Multiple Authors with Shared Affiliation in ACM 2017 Template?Multiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationSame affiliation for all authors without extra packagesIOS-Book-Article.cls: one author with multiple affiliationacmart: Shared Author AffiliationMultiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationAuthor affiliation with only 1 authorAdding Multiple Authors with Different Affiliation in LaTeX ArticleLaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same lineHow to Label Multiple Authors with Same DescriptionHow to make two authors use the same affiliationTwo authors with same affiliation on finished front page

                      How to write “ä” and other umlauts and accented letters in bibliography?Accents in BibTeXSorting references with special characters alphabeticallyUse ae ligature in bibliographyEastern European nameInverted circumflex in BibTexBibTex, non-ascii initials and nameptr fproblems with accent in LatexHow to add a Ø to my bibliography from Jabref?References without accentsTroubles when trying to cite St“omer-Verlet in ”title" field of a bib entryComprehensive list of accented charactersHow to type the letter “i” with two dots (diaeresis) in math mode?Problem with glossary text and accented lettersSpecial character in bibliographyAccented letters, Unicode and LaTeX accentsHow to stop natbib from modifying bibliography styleCitation of a paper with non-standard characters by BibtexWrite accented characters to file using writeHow to group the bibliography alphabetically, if some surnames start with “accented” characters?How can I automatically capitalize significant words in my bibliography?

                      Problem using RevTeX4-1 with “! Undefined control sequence. @bibitemShut”