Bibliography, correct way to setup and invoke the category 'electronic'

Output visual diagram of picture

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do

How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?

New Order #2: Turn My Way

Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Non-Borel set in arbitrary metric space

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?

"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?

"Oh no!" in Latin

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

Sort with assumptions

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Why would five hundred and five same as one?

categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

How to join two vertical cells in latex?



Bibliography, correct way to setup and invoke the category 'electronic'














0















Short question:



What is the correct way to setup and invoke the bibliography mecanism in context, to use, for example, the category electronic?



Long question:



Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have:



  • Required fields: title

  • Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi

In this way, for example, consider the following code:



startbuffer[example]
@ELECTRONIC example,
title = "One title",
url = "http://www.example.org",

stopbuffer

usebtxdefinitions[aps]
setupbtxlist
[aps]

definebtxdataset[basic]
usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer]
definebtxrendering
[basic]
[aps]
[dataset=basic]

setupbtx[dataset=basic]
nocite[example]

starttext
placelistofpublications[basic]
stoptext


When rendered, it produces this ugly output:



Output from the code above



so, to me, this is an errouneous output once only title and url should be rendered. Then this is my question, how is the correct way to use this category, what I am missing?



Ps.:



If I add this code:



startsetups btx:aps:list:electronic
btxdoif author
texdefinitionbtx:aps:author

texdefinitionbtx:aps:title
texdefinitionbtx:aps:organization-if-not-author
btxdoif howpublished
texdefinitionbtx:aps:doi-url btxspacebtxflushhowpublished

btxdoif year
btxleftparenthesis
texdefinitionbtx:aps:year
btxrightparenthesis

texdefinitionbtx:aps:note
stopsetups


I got the correct output:



correct output



But it does not seem correct that I need to change such definitions









share


























    0















    Short question:



    What is the correct way to setup and invoke the bibliography mecanism in context, to use, for example, the category electronic?



    Long question:



    Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have:



    • Required fields: title

    • Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi

    In this way, for example, consider the following code:



    startbuffer[example]
    @ELECTRONIC example,
    title = "One title",
    url = "http://www.example.org",

    stopbuffer

    usebtxdefinitions[aps]
    setupbtxlist
    [aps]

    definebtxdataset[basic]
    usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer]
    definebtxrendering
    [basic]
    [aps]
    [dataset=basic]

    setupbtx[dataset=basic]
    nocite[example]

    starttext
    placelistofpublications[basic]
    stoptext


    When rendered, it produces this ugly output:



    Output from the code above



    so, to me, this is an errouneous output once only title and url should be rendered. Then this is my question, how is the correct way to use this category, what I am missing?



    Ps.:



    If I add this code:



    startsetups btx:aps:list:electronic
    btxdoif author
    texdefinitionbtx:aps:author

    texdefinitionbtx:aps:title
    texdefinitionbtx:aps:organization-if-not-author
    btxdoif howpublished
    texdefinitionbtx:aps:doi-url btxspacebtxflushhowpublished

    btxdoif year
    btxleftparenthesis
    texdefinitionbtx:aps:year
    btxrightparenthesis

    texdefinitionbtx:aps:note
    stopsetups


    I got the correct output:



    correct output



    But it does not seem correct that I need to change such definitions









    share
























      0












      0








      0








      Short question:



      What is the correct way to setup and invoke the bibliography mecanism in context, to use, for example, the category electronic?



      Long question:



      Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have:



      • Required fields: title

      • Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi

      In this way, for example, consider the following code:



      startbuffer[example]
      @ELECTRONIC example,
      title = "One title",
      url = "http://www.example.org",

      stopbuffer

      usebtxdefinitions[aps]
      setupbtxlist
      [aps]

      definebtxdataset[basic]
      usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer]
      definebtxrendering
      [basic]
      [aps]
      [dataset=basic]

      setupbtx[dataset=basic]
      nocite[example]

      starttext
      placelistofpublications[basic]
      stoptext


      When rendered, it produces this ugly output:



      Output from the code above



      so, to me, this is an errouneous output once only title and url should be rendered. Then this is my question, how is the correct way to use this category, what I am missing?



      Ps.:



      If I add this code:



      startsetups btx:aps:list:electronic
      btxdoif author
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:author

      texdefinitionbtx:aps:title
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:organization-if-not-author
      btxdoif howpublished
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:doi-url btxspacebtxflushhowpublished

      btxdoif year
      btxleftparenthesis
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:year
      btxrightparenthesis

      texdefinitionbtx:aps:note
      stopsetups


      I got the correct output:



      correct output



      But it does not seem correct that I need to change such definitions









      share














      Short question:



      What is the correct way to setup and invoke the bibliography mecanism in context, to use, for example, the category electronic?



      Long question:



      Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have:



      • Required fields: title

      • Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi

      In this way, for example, consider the following code:



      startbuffer[example]
      @ELECTRONIC example,
      title = "One title",
      url = "http://www.example.org",

      stopbuffer

      usebtxdefinitions[aps]
      setupbtxlist
      [aps]

      definebtxdataset[basic]
      usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer]
      definebtxrendering
      [basic]
      [aps]
      [dataset=basic]

      setupbtx[dataset=basic]
      nocite[example]

      starttext
      placelistofpublications[basic]
      stoptext


      When rendered, it produces this ugly output:



      Output from the code above



      so, to me, this is an errouneous output once only title and url should be rendered. Then this is my question, how is the correct way to use this category, what I am missing?



      Ps.:



      If I add this code:



      startsetups btx:aps:list:electronic
      btxdoif author
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:author

      texdefinitionbtx:aps:title
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:organization-if-not-author
      btxdoif howpublished
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:doi-url btxspacebtxflushhowpublished

      btxdoif year
      btxleftparenthesis
      texdefinitionbtx:aps:year
      btxrightparenthesis

      texdefinitionbtx:aps:note
      stopsetups


      I got the correct output:



      correct output



      But it does not seem correct that I need to change such definitions







      context





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 3 mins ago









      AmadeusAmadeus

      1725




      1725




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480416%2fbibliography-correct-way-to-setup-and-invoke-the-category-electronic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480416%2fbibliography-correct-way-to-setup-and-invoke-the-category-electronic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

          152 Atala Notae | Nexus externi | Tabula navigationis"Discovery Circumstances: Numbered Minor Planets"2000152Small-Body Database

          Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"