Relations between homogeneous polynomialsCount the number of homogeneous polynomialshomogeneous polynomials over a finite fieldIs complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials, an irreducibile element in Polynomial ring?Hilbert's Nullstellensatz on polynomials with integer coefficientsIs an ideal generated by multilinear, irreducible, homogeneous polynomials of different degrees always radical?morphism flat and relationsDegrees of generators of radical idealsDegrees of polynomials defining a Jacobian of maximal rank on a varietyReduction formula for Schubert polynomialsMinimal “subset” of a set of homogeneous polynomials with same solution space

Relations between homogeneous polynomials


Count the number of homogeneous polynomialshomogeneous polynomials over a finite fieldIs complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials, an irreducibile element in Polynomial ring?Hilbert's Nullstellensatz on polynomials with integer coefficientsIs an ideal generated by multilinear, irreducible, homogeneous polynomials of different degrees always radical?morphism flat and relationsDegrees of generators of radical idealsDegrees of polynomials defining a Jacobian of maximal rank on a varietyReduction formula for Schubert polynomialsMinimal “subset” of a set of homogeneous polynomials with same solution space













3












$begingroup$


Let $F_1,ldots ,F_ellin mathbbC[X_1,ldots , X_n]$ be general homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$. For $p<d$, it seems likely that there is no nontrivial relation $sum F_iG_i=0$ with $G_1,ldots ,G_ell$ homogeneous of degree $p$. Is this known? If yes, what would be a reference (or a proof)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    34 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    26 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    9 mins ago
















3












$begingroup$


Let $F_1,ldots ,F_ellin mathbbC[X_1,ldots , X_n]$ be general homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$. For $p<d$, it seems likely that there is no nontrivial relation $sum F_iG_i=0$ with $G_1,ldots ,G_ell$ homogeneous of degree $p$. Is this known? If yes, what would be a reference (or a proof)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    34 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    26 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    9 mins ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Let $F_1,ldots ,F_ellin mathbbC[X_1,ldots , X_n]$ be general homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$. For $p<d$, it seems likely that there is no nontrivial relation $sum F_iG_i=0$ with $G_1,ldots ,G_ell$ homogeneous of degree $p$. Is this known? If yes, what would be a reference (or a proof)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $F_1,ldots ,F_ellin mathbbC[X_1,ldots , X_n]$ be general homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$. For $p<d$, it seems likely that there is no nontrivial relation $sum F_iG_i=0$ with $G_1,ldots ,G_ell$ homogeneous of degree $p$. Is this known? If yes, what would be a reference (or a proof)?







ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 58 mins ago







abx

















asked 1 hour ago









abxabx

23.8k34885




23.8k34885











  • $begingroup$
    I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    34 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    26 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    9 mins ago

















  • $begingroup$
    I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    34 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    26 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
    $endgroup$
    – user44191
    9 mins ago
















$begingroup$
I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
$endgroup$
– user44191
34 mins ago





$begingroup$
I think this question needs some clarification. I think you may mean something along the lines of: let $X$ be the moduli space of $n$-tuples of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$; within $X$, there is a subspace $Y$ consisting of homogeneous polynomials that satisfy a nontrivial relation $sum F_i G_i = 0$ for some $G_i$ homogeneous of degree $p < d$ (i.e. the union of the subspaces determined by each tuple $G$). Is it true that $Y subsetneq X$?
$endgroup$
– user44191
34 mins ago













$begingroup$
Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
$endgroup$
– abx
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
Sure. Is that different from what I wrote?
$endgroup$
– abx
31 mins ago












$begingroup$
I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
$endgroup$
– user44191
26 mins ago




$begingroup$
I found what you wrote ambiguous or underdetermined, e.g. with what you mean by "general"; I thought what I wrote made it more explicitly clear (though it may be overkill as written).
$endgroup$
– user44191
26 mins ago












$begingroup$
This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
$endgroup$
– user44191
9 mins ago





$begingroup$
This seem trivially false if I haven't misunderstood the question. Take $n = 1, p = 0, d = 1, ell = 2$. Then $F_1 = ax, F_2 = bx$ for some $a, b$, so $b F_1 - a F_2 = 0$. I think both $n, ell$ play some role.
$endgroup$
– user44191
9 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

I think this can be controlled as follows. Let $Z subset mathbbP^n-1$ be the complete intersection defined by $F_i$. Then there is a Koszul resolution
$$
dots to mathcalO(-2d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(-d)^ell to mathcalO to mathcalO_Z to 0.
$$

Twisting it by $mathcalO(d+p)$ we obtain
$$
dots to mathcalO(p-d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(p)^ell to mathcalO(d+p) to mathcalO_Z(d+p) to 0.
$$

Your question is equivalent to injectivity of the induced map
$$
H^0(mathcalO(p)^ell) to H^0(mathcalO(d+p)).
$$

If $n ge ell$ the cohomology spectral sequence of the twisted Koszul complex proves this. Is that enough for your purposes?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    27 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325793%2frelations-between-homogeneous-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

I think this can be controlled as follows. Let $Z subset mathbbP^n-1$ be the complete intersection defined by $F_i$. Then there is a Koszul resolution
$$
dots to mathcalO(-2d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(-d)^ell to mathcalO to mathcalO_Z to 0.
$$

Twisting it by $mathcalO(d+p)$ we obtain
$$
dots to mathcalO(p-d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(p)^ell to mathcalO(d+p) to mathcalO_Z(d+p) to 0.
$$

Your question is equivalent to injectivity of the induced map
$$
H^0(mathcalO(p)^ell) to H^0(mathcalO(d+p)).
$$

If $n ge ell$ the cohomology spectral sequence of the twisted Koszul complex proves this. Is that enough for your purposes?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    27 mins ago















4












$begingroup$

I think this can be controlled as follows. Let $Z subset mathbbP^n-1$ be the complete intersection defined by $F_i$. Then there is a Koszul resolution
$$
dots to mathcalO(-2d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(-d)^ell to mathcalO to mathcalO_Z to 0.
$$

Twisting it by $mathcalO(d+p)$ we obtain
$$
dots to mathcalO(p-d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(p)^ell to mathcalO(d+p) to mathcalO_Z(d+p) to 0.
$$

Your question is equivalent to injectivity of the induced map
$$
H^0(mathcalO(p)^ell) to H^0(mathcalO(d+p)).
$$

If $n ge ell$ the cohomology spectral sequence of the twisted Koszul complex proves this. Is that enough for your purposes?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    27 mins ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

I think this can be controlled as follows. Let $Z subset mathbbP^n-1$ be the complete intersection defined by $F_i$. Then there is a Koszul resolution
$$
dots to mathcalO(-2d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(-d)^ell to mathcalO to mathcalO_Z to 0.
$$

Twisting it by $mathcalO(d+p)$ we obtain
$$
dots to mathcalO(p-d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(p)^ell to mathcalO(d+p) to mathcalO_Z(d+p) to 0.
$$

Your question is equivalent to injectivity of the induced map
$$
H^0(mathcalO(p)^ell) to H^0(mathcalO(d+p)).
$$

If $n ge ell$ the cohomology spectral sequence of the twisted Koszul complex proves this. Is that enough for your purposes?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I think this can be controlled as follows. Let $Z subset mathbbP^n-1$ be the complete intersection defined by $F_i$. Then there is a Koszul resolution
$$
dots to mathcalO(-2d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(-d)^ell to mathcalO to mathcalO_Z to 0.
$$

Twisting it by $mathcalO(d+p)$ we obtain
$$
dots to mathcalO(p-d)^binomell2 to mathcalO(p)^ell to mathcalO(d+p) to mathcalO_Z(d+p) to 0.
$$

Your question is equivalent to injectivity of the induced map
$$
H^0(mathcalO(p)^ell) to H^0(mathcalO(d+p)).
$$

If $n ge ell$ the cohomology spectral sequence of the twisted Koszul complex proves this. Is that enough for your purposes?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 44 mins ago









SashaSasha

21k22755




21k22755











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    27 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    27 mins ago















$begingroup$
Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
$endgroup$
– abx
27 mins ago




$begingroup$
Thanks, but could you explain why the Koszul complex gives that?
$endgroup$
– abx
27 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325793%2frelations-between-homogeneous-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

acmart: Multiple authors: all with same affiliation, one author an additional affiliationHow to Write Names of Multiple Authors with Shared Affiliation in ACM 2017 Template?Multiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationSame affiliation for all authors without extra packagesIOS-Book-Article.cls: one author with multiple affiliationacmart: Shared Author AffiliationMultiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationAuthor affiliation with only 1 authorAdding Multiple Authors with Different Affiliation in LaTeX ArticleLaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same lineHow to Label Multiple Authors with Same DescriptionHow to make two authors use the same affiliationTwo authors with same affiliation on finished front page

How to write “ä” and other umlauts and accented letters in bibliography?Accents in BibTeXSorting references with special characters alphabeticallyUse ae ligature in bibliographyEastern European nameInverted circumflex in BibTexBibTex, non-ascii initials and nameptr fproblems with accent in LatexHow to add a Ø to my bibliography from Jabref?References without accentsTroubles when trying to cite St“omer-Verlet in ”title" field of a bib entryComprehensive list of accented charactersHow to type the letter “i” with two dots (diaeresis) in math mode?Problem with glossary text and accented lettersSpecial character in bibliographyAccented letters, Unicode and LaTeX accentsHow to stop natbib from modifying bibliography styleCitation of a paper with non-standard characters by BibtexWrite accented characters to file using writeHow to group the bibliography alphabetically, if some surnames start with “accented” characters?How can I automatically capitalize significant words in my bibliography?

Problem using RevTeX4-1 with “! Undefined control sequence. @bibitemShut”