Is a vector space a subspace?vector space and its subspaceProve: The set of all polynomials p with p(2) = p(3) is a vector spaceVector Space vs SubspaceProving a subset is a subspace of a Vector SpaceAre all vector spaces also a subspace?Understand the definition of a vector subspaceProving vector subspaceProve that, with vector addition and scalar multiplication well-defined, $V/W$ becomes a vector space over $k$.Is the set of all exponential functions a subspace of the vector space of all continuous functions?Linear Algebra - Zero subspace vs empty subspace

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Finding files for which a command fails

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

I see my dog run

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Why is my log file so massive? 22gb. I am running log backups

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

aging parents with no investments

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

LWC and complex parameters

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?



Is a vector space a subspace?


vector space and its subspaceProve: The set of all polynomials p with p(2) = p(3) is a vector spaceVector Space vs SubspaceProving a subset is a subspace of a Vector SpaceAre all vector spaces also a subspace?Understand the definition of a vector subspaceProving vector subspaceProve that, with vector addition and scalar multiplication well-defined, $V/W$ becomes a vector space over $k$.Is the set of all exponential functions a subspace of the vector space of all continuous functions?Linear Algebra - Zero subspace vs empty subspace













1












$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself??
Also, I'm getting confuse doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself??
Also, I'm getting confuse doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    1 hour ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself??
Also, I'm getting confuse doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself??
Also, I'm getting confuse doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces




linear-algebra vector-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









José Carlos Santos

173k23133241




173k23133241










asked 1 hour ago









mingming

4456




4456











  • $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
$endgroup$
– Brian
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
$endgroup$
– Brian
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
1 hour ago





1




1




$begingroup$
The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



    To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



    There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



    Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



    I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



    You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180447%2fis-a-vector-space-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          173k23133241




          173k23133241





















              1












              $begingroup$

              I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



              To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



              There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



              Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



              I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



              You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                  To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                  There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                  Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                  I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                  You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                  To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                  There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                  Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                  I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                  You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 37 mins ago









                  Theo BenditTheo Bendit

                  20.7k12354




                  20.7k12354



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180447%2fis-a-vector-space-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

                      Image
                      Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed? Time travel short story where a man arrives in the late 19th century in a time machine and then sends the machine back into the past Go Pregnant or Go Home Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late? How can my private key be revealed if I use the same nonce while generating the signature? Modify casing of marked letters Trouble understanding overseas colleagues Best way to store options for panels Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet? How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat? How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus? Why does John Bercow say “unlock” after reading out the results of a vote? The Riley Riddle Mine Print name if parameter passed to function How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2" Hide Select Output from T-SQL Can I convert a rim brake wheel to a disc brak
                      Read more

                      152 Atala Notae | Nexus externi | Tabula navigationis"Discovery Circumstances: Numbered Minor Planets"2000152Small-Body Database

                      Image
                      L +1Latinitas +1 (bona)Asteroides anno 1875 repertiAsteroides Cinguli PrincipalisAsteroides a rebus ficticiis appellati Atalaasteroidessystematis solarisasteroidibus Cinguli PrincipalisAstronomismagnitudinem absolutam2 Novembris1875Paulo-Petro HenryObservatorio Lutetiaelitteris Francogallicis1801Castrobrientiiepochaeunitatum astronomicarumquam minimequam maximeInclinatio orbitalis°anomalia media [1]Small-Body DatabaseMercuriusVenusTellus (Terra)MarsIuppiterSaturnusUranusNeptunusSatellitesLunaAsteroidesindicesCorpora transneptuniana Vide etiam paginam discretivam: Atala 152 Atala Genus Asteroides Cinguli Principalis Res orbitales epochae 4 Ianuarii 2010 Excentricitas 0.0754396 Axis semimaior perihelion aphelion 3.1399791 UA 2.9031003 UA 3.3768579 UA Inclinatio orbitalis 12.11235° Longitudo nodi ascendentis 40.00824° Argumentum perihelii 58.52961° Anomalia media 348.89681° Periodus orbitalis 5.5641436375086 anni Res physicae Diameter km Massa kg Densitas media g/cm 3 Periodus rotation
                      Read more

                      Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

                      Image
                      Antidepressiva depressionuminsomniareceptorium H 1 agonista inversapruritusdermatitis atopicaelichenis simplicis chronici (neurodermatitis) Cave: notitiae huius paginae nec praescriptiones nec consilia medica sunt. Doxepinum Natura chemica Formula chemica C 19 H 21 NO Massa molaris 279.376 g/mol PubChem 3158 DrugBank DB01142 Natura pharmacologica Codex ATC N06AA12 ( WHO ) Tempus semivitae biologicum 17 (8-24) h Nor-Doxepinum: 31 h Metabolismus iecore (hepaticus): CYP2D6 CYP2C19 Metabolitus Nor-Doxepinum Excretio renibus (ca. 50%), faecibus: minus Ad usum therapeuticum Applicatio per os, i.v., i.m. MedlinePlus a682390 .mw-parser-output .existinglinksgray a,.mw-parser-output .existinglinksgray a:visitedcolor:gray.mw-parser-output .existinglinksgray a.newcolor:#ba0000.mw-parser-output .existinglinksgray a.new:visitedcolor:#a55858 (Anglice) Doxepinum est substantia psychoanaleptica et antidepressiva, ergo medicamentum tractationis depressionum, praesertim cum insomnia praesente, effectu
                      Read more