Closed subgroups of abelian groupsEmbedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Is there a minimum number of transactions in a block?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Example of a relative pronoun

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Why is an old chain unsafe?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Infinite past with a beginning?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

Can you lasso down a wizard who is using the Levitate spell?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag

Motorized valve interfering with button?

Japan - Any leeway for max visa duration due to unforeseen circumstances?



Closed subgroups of abelian groups


Embedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups













2












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    2 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    2 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?







general-topology differential-geometry lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Clayton

19.6k33288




19.6k33288










asked 4 hours ago









Amrat AAmrat A

340111




340111







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    2 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    2 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
2 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Alex YoucisAlex Youcis

36k775115




36k775115











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago











3












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









RandallRandall

10.7k11431




10.7k11431







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
1 hour ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I use the fbox command correctly to avoid producing a Bad Box message?How to put a long piece of text in a box?How to specify height and width of fboxIs there an arrayrulecolor-like command to change the rule color of fbox?What is the command to highlight bad boxes in pdf?Why does fbox sometimes place the box *over* the graphic image?how to put the text in the boxHow to create command for a box where text inside the box can automatically adjust?how can I make an fbox like command with certain color, shape and width of border?how to use fbox in align modeFbox increase the spacing between the box and it content (inner margin)how to change the box height of an equationWhat is the use of the hbox in a newcommand command?

Doxepinum Nexus interni Notae | Tabula navigationis3158DB01142WHOa682390"Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor""Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain""Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review"

inputenc: Unicode character … not set up for use with LaTeX The Next CEO of Stack OverflowEntering Unicode characters in LaTeXHow to solve the `Package inputenc Error: Unicode char not set up for use with LaTeX` problem?solve “Unicode char is not set up for use with LaTeX” without special handling of every new interesting UTF-8 characterPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character ² (U+B2)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. acroI2C[I²C]package inputenc error unicode char (u + 190) not set up for use with latexPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char u8:′ not set up for use with LaTeX. 3′inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeX with G-BriefPackage Inputenc Error: Unicode char u8: not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. includePackage inputenc Error: Unicode char ̂ (U+302)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. … $widehatleft (OA,AA' right )$Package inputenc Error: Unicode char â„¡ (U+2121)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX. printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]Package inputenc Error: Unicode char − (U+2212)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode character α (U+3B1) not set up for use with LaTeXPackage inputenc Error: Unicode characterError: ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ⊘ (U+2298)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX