What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Easy to read palindrome checker

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

How to set page number in right side in chapter title page?

Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv

Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?

Can Sneak Attack be used when hitting with an improvised weapon?

What is the difference between Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

When "be it" is at the beginning of a sentence, what kind of structure do you call it?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

Can I use the word “Senior” as part of a job title directly in German?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Inexact numbers as keys in Association?

Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Redefining symbol midway through a document



What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?










4















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago















4















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago













4












4








4








Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question














Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.







wto






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









FizzFizz

12.8k12981




12.8k12981







  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago







1




1





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
2 hours ago





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



  • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


  • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



  • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


  • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



    • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


    • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


    Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



    • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


    • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


    A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



    A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



    As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



      • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


      • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


      Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



      • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


      • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


      A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



      A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



      As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






        share|improve this answer















        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

        13.9k33860




        13.9k33860



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            acmart: Multiple authors: all with same affiliation, one author an additional affiliationHow to Write Names of Multiple Authors with Shared Affiliation in ACM 2017 Template?Multiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationSame affiliation for all authors without extra packagesIOS-Book-Article.cls: one author with multiple affiliationacmart: Shared Author AffiliationMultiple authors with different primary affiliation, but same additional affiliationAuthor affiliation with only 1 authorAdding Multiple Authors with Different Affiliation in LaTeX ArticleLaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same lineHow to Label Multiple Authors with Same DescriptionHow to make two authors use the same affiliationTwo authors with same affiliation on finished front page

            How to write “ä” and other umlauts and accented letters in bibliography?Accents in BibTeXSorting references with special characters alphabeticallyUse ae ligature in bibliographyEastern European nameInverted circumflex in BibTexBibTex, non-ascii initials and nameptr fproblems with accent in LatexHow to add a Ø to my bibliography from Jabref?References without accentsTroubles when trying to cite St“omer-Verlet in ”title" field of a bib entryComprehensive list of accented charactersHow to type the letter “i” with two dots (diaeresis) in math mode?Problem with glossary text and accented lettersSpecial character in bibliographyAccented letters, Unicode and LaTeX accentsHow to stop natbib from modifying bibliography styleCitation of a paper with non-standard characters by BibtexWrite accented characters to file using writeHow to group the bibliography alphabetically, if some surnames start with “accented” characters?How can I automatically capitalize significant words in my bibliography?

            How to force a table into page width?How to make table spanning textwidthMaking table width fit into text widthTable with tabular, column type p grabbing available spaceMaking widths of tables equal to width of textblocklatex tabular width the same as the textwidthMake tabular span textwidth exactlySet width of table to be the whole line or a given portion of itIs the tabu package obsolete?What is the difference between tabular, tabular* and tabularx environments?How can i set the width of a table?Making table width fit into text widthTabular and grid typesettingMake table use page widthTable exceeds page widthtable width automatically to page widthHow to shrink table to page widthForce table column to be zero widthTable width exceeds the page widthTable extending beyond the page widthforce longtable to text width