TeX Live installation is missing tlmgr, how to fix?Fresh install texlive 2012 @ Ubuntu 12.04: tlmgr nowhere to be foundUpdating TeX on LinuxHow to upgrade TeXLive 2009 to TeXLive 2010How to configure kile to run texlive 2011?Update Mac binaries on Ubuntu server with tlmgr (TeX Live 2011)TeX Live — problem with install [Ubuntu, bash]; new packagesMissing tlmgr texlive 2012LaTeX Command line in OS XTeX Live tools on command line unreferencedcan't find tlmgrTeX Live Manager Update setup on LinuxCan not install xzdec by tlmgr
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
How can I wire 7 outdoor posts correctly?
Tikz: place node leftmost of two nodes of different widths
What are substitutions for coconut in curry?
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
Worshiping one God at a time?
Open new file while keeping the focus on the the current buffer
How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?
How could an airship be repaired midflight?
Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?
Can a medieval gyroplane be built?
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?
How can my new character not be a role-playing handicap to the party?
How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?
Print last inputted byte
Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator
Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands
Error: "inconsistent hash". Workers crash and node is unable to connect to others
How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
TeX Live installation is missing tlmgr, how to fix?
Fresh install texlive 2012 @ Ubuntu 12.04: tlmgr nowhere to be foundUpdating TeX on LinuxHow to upgrade TeXLive 2009 to TeXLive 2010How to configure kile to run texlive 2011?Update Mac binaries on Ubuntu server with tlmgr (TeX Live 2011)TeX Live — problem with install [Ubuntu, bash]; new packagesMissing tlmgr texlive 2012LaTeX Command line in OS XTeX Live tools on command line unreferencedcan't find tlmgrTeX Live Manager Update setup on LinuxCan not install xzdec by tlmgr
I installed with the net install TeX Live 2010 on an Ubuntu machine. Because I don't have to much space to spare I carefully selected components to install to reduce the required disk-space.
Later I missed some package and I wanted to install it with tlmgr. However, tlmgr is nowhere to be found! I'm guessing I somehow didn't install it.
How can I fix this the best?
Edit: I did really installed the TeX Live 2010 from the TeX Live website. I downloaded this file, and started the installation with sudo ./install-tl. The paths I kept standard and the only thing I changed are which collections are installed, leaving some collections that are not useful for me out. When I list all binaries in /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux I have e.g. latex,lualatex,bibtex etc. but not xetex (which I didn't want to install) and not tlmgr.
Also, when I type pdflatex anywhere, I see the following version This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.11 (Tex Live 2010) which wouldn't be possible with Ubuntu packages, as they are TeX Live 2009. (which pdflatex gives /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux/pdflatex)
installing texlive
|
show 4 more comments
I installed with the net install TeX Live 2010 on an Ubuntu machine. Because I don't have to much space to spare I carefully selected components to install to reduce the required disk-space.
Later I missed some package and I wanted to install it with tlmgr. However, tlmgr is nowhere to be found! I'm guessing I somehow didn't install it.
How can I fix this the best?
Edit: I did really installed the TeX Live 2010 from the TeX Live website. I downloaded this file, and started the installation with sudo ./install-tl. The paths I kept standard and the only thing I changed are which collections are installed, leaving some collections that are not useful for me out. When I list all binaries in /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux I have e.g. latex,lualatex,bibtex etc. but not xetex (which I didn't want to install) and not tlmgr.
Also, when I type pdflatex anywhere, I see the following version This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.11 (Tex Live 2010) which wouldn't be possible with Ubuntu packages, as they are TeX Live 2009. (which pdflatex gives /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux/pdflatex)
installing texlive
2
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
1
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
1
it should be a link to../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pltry to create it
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
1
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
1
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23
|
show 4 more comments
I installed with the net install TeX Live 2010 on an Ubuntu machine. Because I don't have to much space to spare I carefully selected components to install to reduce the required disk-space.
Later I missed some package and I wanted to install it with tlmgr. However, tlmgr is nowhere to be found! I'm guessing I somehow didn't install it.
How can I fix this the best?
Edit: I did really installed the TeX Live 2010 from the TeX Live website. I downloaded this file, and started the installation with sudo ./install-tl. The paths I kept standard and the only thing I changed are which collections are installed, leaving some collections that are not useful for me out. When I list all binaries in /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux I have e.g. latex,lualatex,bibtex etc. but not xetex (which I didn't want to install) and not tlmgr.
Also, when I type pdflatex anywhere, I see the following version This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.11 (Tex Live 2010) which wouldn't be possible with Ubuntu packages, as they are TeX Live 2009. (which pdflatex gives /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux/pdflatex)
installing texlive
I installed with the net install TeX Live 2010 on an Ubuntu machine. Because I don't have to much space to spare I carefully selected components to install to reduce the required disk-space.
Later I missed some package and I wanted to install it with tlmgr. However, tlmgr is nowhere to be found! I'm guessing I somehow didn't install it.
How can I fix this the best?
Edit: I did really installed the TeX Live 2010 from the TeX Live website. I downloaded this file, and started the installation with sudo ./install-tl. The paths I kept standard and the only thing I changed are which collections are installed, leaving some collections that are not useful for me out. When I list all binaries in /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux I have e.g. latex,lualatex,bibtex etc. but not xetex (which I didn't want to install) and not tlmgr.
Also, when I type pdflatex anywhere, I see the following version This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.11 (Tex Live 2010) which wouldn't be possible with Ubuntu packages, as they are TeX Live 2009. (which pdflatex gives /usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/i386-linux/pdflatex)
installing texlive
installing texlive
edited 21 mins ago
Svend Tveskæg
20.8k1052140
20.8k1052140
asked Dec 23 '10 at 7:31
Peter SmitPeter Smit
5,155164765
5,155164765
2
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
1
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
1
it should be a link to../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pltry to create it
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
1
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
1
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23
|
show 4 more comments
2
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
1
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
1
it should be a link to../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pltry to create it
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
1
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
1
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23
2
2
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
1
1
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
1
1
it should be a link to
../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pl try to create it– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
it should be a link to
../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pl try to create it– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
1
1
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
1
1
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23
|
show 4 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
It should be safe to install TL again with the same location settings, and this time only select tlmgr. (I'm surprised tlmgr is not part of the 'essential binaries' group anyway.) I think it would be safe to uncheck all "macros for XXX" options sice they will not be erased from a previous install, I'm less sure about font options.
Are you installing a version of TL provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Those have been known to remove tlmgr in the first place, since it's a packaging mechanism that bypasses the distribution's own.)
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, henceupdate --allwill not work as expected, etc.
– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
add a comment |
During the installation of TeX Live 2010, ensure that you go into the options menu and enable the creation of the symlinks. (At least, this is the cause of a common problem with another project I've worked on -- folks forget to create the symlinks, so tlmgr, etc. aren't in the PATH.)
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
Just use install-tl and do a custom install over, but not replacing, your already existing install, selecting just the essential collection "Essential programs and files". It worked for me.
add a comment |
You can't fix it without using TeXLive instead of the Debian/Ubuntu packages. Deb/Ub strip out the tlmgr since it can create conflicts with apt, their own package manager (apt cannot know what tlmgr has updated; Deb/Ub have files distributed amongst a different array of packages to texlive, etc).
You can install anything new you want in a local texmf tree; tex ought to look here first if configured normally, so if you need a newer version or something not in the Deb packages, you can install it locally and not mess around in root. This would nominally be a preferred option in the general Linux way of operating. This is suboptimal in disk space (cheap these days, though) and in presence of multiple versions. I mean, Deb will eventually upgrade its texlive, and then you might have to manually mess around with your local texmf tree; but this ought to be a useful alternative solution.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7609%2ftex-live-installation-is-missing-tlmgr-how-to-fix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It should be safe to install TL again with the same location settings, and this time only select tlmgr. (I'm surprised tlmgr is not part of the 'essential binaries' group anyway.) I think it would be safe to uncheck all "macros for XXX" options sice they will not be erased from a previous install, I'm less sure about font options.
Are you installing a version of TL provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Those have been known to remove tlmgr in the first place, since it's a packaging mechanism that bypasses the distribution's own.)
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, henceupdate --allwill not work as expected, etc.
– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
add a comment |
It should be safe to install TL again with the same location settings, and this time only select tlmgr. (I'm surprised tlmgr is not part of the 'essential binaries' group anyway.) I think it would be safe to uncheck all "macros for XXX" options sice they will not be erased from a previous install, I'm less sure about font options.
Are you installing a version of TL provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Those have been known to remove tlmgr in the first place, since it's a packaging mechanism that bypasses the distribution's own.)
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, henceupdate --allwill not work as expected, etc.
– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
add a comment |
It should be safe to install TL again with the same location settings, and this time only select tlmgr. (I'm surprised tlmgr is not part of the 'essential binaries' group anyway.) I think it would be safe to uncheck all "macros for XXX" options sice they will not be erased from a previous install, I'm less sure about font options.
Are you installing a version of TL provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Those have been known to remove tlmgr in the first place, since it's a packaging mechanism that bypasses the distribution's own.)
It should be safe to install TL again with the same location settings, and this time only select tlmgr. (I'm surprised tlmgr is not part of the 'essential binaries' group anyway.) I think it would be safe to uncheck all "macros for XXX" options sice they will not be erased from a previous install, I'm less sure about font options.
Are you installing a version of TL provided by Debian/Ubuntu? Those have been known to remove tlmgr in the first place, since it's a packaging mechanism that bypasses the distribution's own.)
answered Dec 23 '10 at 7:59
Ulrich SchwarzUlrich Schwarz
8,26722848
8,26722848
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, henceupdate --allwill not work as expected, etc.
– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
add a comment |
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, henceupdate --allwill not work as expected, etc.
– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
No, it is the TL installer from the texlive website. I am not sure in which 'collection' tlmgr is located. The essential binary collection is installed, as I have latex et al.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:06
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
@Peter Smit: tlmgr is in texlive.infra, but as Herbert says, it's only a symlink.
– Ulrich Schwarz
Dec 23 '10 at 11:30
2
2
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, hence
update --all will not work as expected, etc.– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
no, it's not really safe. True, existing files won't be deleted, but the problem is, tlmgr will not know about the already installed packages, hence
update --all will not work as expected, etc.– mpg
Dec 23 '10 at 17:25
add a comment |
During the installation of TeX Live 2010, ensure that you go into the options menu and enable the creation of the symlinks. (At least, this is the cause of a common problem with another project I've worked on -- folks forget to create the symlinks, so tlmgr, etc. aren't in the PATH.)
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
During the installation of TeX Live 2010, ensure that you go into the options menu and enable the creation of the symlinks. (At least, this is the cause of a common problem with another project I've worked on -- folks forget to create the symlinks, so tlmgr, etc. aren't in the PATH.)
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
During the installation of TeX Live 2010, ensure that you go into the options menu and enable the creation of the symlinks. (At least, this is the cause of a common problem with another project I've worked on -- folks forget to create the symlinks, so tlmgr, etc. aren't in the PATH.)
During the installation of TeX Live 2010, ensure that you go into the options menu and enable the creation of the symlinks. (At least, this is the cause of a common problem with another project I've worked on -- folks forget to create the symlinks, so tlmgr, etc. aren't in the PATH.)
answered Dec 24 '10 at 3:14
godbykgodbyk
6,17212339
6,17212339
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
It's quite weird that the symlink option isn't listed in the 'O' summary on the main page of the install prompt.
– T. Verron
Aug 22 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
Just use install-tl and do a custom install over, but not replacing, your already existing install, selecting just the essential collection "Essential programs and files". It worked for me.
add a comment |
Just use install-tl and do a custom install over, but not replacing, your already existing install, selecting just the essential collection "Essential programs and files". It worked for me.
add a comment |
Just use install-tl and do a custom install over, but not replacing, your already existing install, selecting just the essential collection "Essential programs and files". It worked for me.
Just use install-tl and do a custom install over, but not replacing, your already existing install, selecting just the essential collection "Essential programs and files". It worked for me.
answered Mar 11 '14 at 3:17
GeremiaGeremia
8781924
8781924
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can't fix it without using TeXLive instead of the Debian/Ubuntu packages. Deb/Ub strip out the tlmgr since it can create conflicts with apt, their own package manager (apt cannot know what tlmgr has updated; Deb/Ub have files distributed amongst a different array of packages to texlive, etc).
You can install anything new you want in a local texmf tree; tex ought to look here first if configured normally, so if you need a newer version or something not in the Deb packages, you can install it locally and not mess around in root. This would nominally be a preferred option in the general Linux way of operating. This is suboptimal in disk space (cheap these days, though) and in presence of multiple versions. I mean, Deb will eventually upgrade its texlive, and then you might have to manually mess around with your local texmf tree; but this ought to be a useful alternative solution.
add a comment |
You can't fix it without using TeXLive instead of the Debian/Ubuntu packages. Deb/Ub strip out the tlmgr since it can create conflicts with apt, their own package manager (apt cannot know what tlmgr has updated; Deb/Ub have files distributed amongst a different array of packages to texlive, etc).
You can install anything new you want in a local texmf tree; tex ought to look here first if configured normally, so if you need a newer version or something not in the Deb packages, you can install it locally and not mess around in root. This would nominally be a preferred option in the general Linux way of operating. This is suboptimal in disk space (cheap these days, though) and in presence of multiple versions. I mean, Deb will eventually upgrade its texlive, and then you might have to manually mess around with your local texmf tree; but this ought to be a useful alternative solution.
add a comment |
You can't fix it without using TeXLive instead of the Debian/Ubuntu packages. Deb/Ub strip out the tlmgr since it can create conflicts with apt, their own package manager (apt cannot know what tlmgr has updated; Deb/Ub have files distributed amongst a different array of packages to texlive, etc).
You can install anything new you want in a local texmf tree; tex ought to look here first if configured normally, so if you need a newer version or something not in the Deb packages, you can install it locally and not mess around in root. This would nominally be a preferred option in the general Linux way of operating. This is suboptimal in disk space (cheap these days, though) and in presence of multiple versions. I mean, Deb will eventually upgrade its texlive, and then you might have to manually mess around with your local texmf tree; but this ought to be a useful alternative solution.
You can't fix it without using TeXLive instead of the Debian/Ubuntu packages. Deb/Ub strip out the tlmgr since it can create conflicts with apt, their own package manager (apt cannot know what tlmgr has updated; Deb/Ub have files distributed amongst a different array of packages to texlive, etc).
You can install anything new you want in a local texmf tree; tex ought to look here first if configured normally, so if you need a newer version or something not in the Deb packages, you can install it locally and not mess around in root. This would nominally be a preferred option in the general Linux way of operating. This is suboptimal in disk space (cheap these days, though) and in presence of multiple versions. I mean, Deb will eventually upgrade its texlive, and then you might have to manually mess around with your local texmf tree; but this ought to be a useful alternative solution.
answered May 2 '15 at 22:13
DarrenDarren
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7609%2ftex-live-installation-is-missing-tlmgr-how-to-fix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It sounds very much to me as if you are using Ubuntu's TeX Live packages rather than installing TeX Live directly. Ubuntu removed tlmgr, as they expect you only to install their packages.
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:04
1
@Joseph I think I didn't install Ubuntu's texlive packages. See also my edit.
– Peter Smit
Dec 23 '10 at 8:13
1
it should be a link to
../../texmf/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pltry to create it– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:15
1
@Peter, then your installation is incomplete. Without these scripts directory you can't run a lot of other things
– Herbert
Dec 23 '10 at 8:21
1
@Peter. I agree with Herbert: something is badly up here. I'd try re-installing TeX Live!
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 23 '10 at 8:23